http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47254
Shakthi Kannan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skannan at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44317
Shakthi Kannan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skannan at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44317
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57297
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 16 May 2013, jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57297
>
> --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
> So far I have not attempted to reproduce thi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57309
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Can you isolate a testcase for the worst loop?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57304
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
Summary|Revision 198896
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57303
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57302
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23684
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msharov at users dot
sourceforge.n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57304
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn ---
The patch seems to fix the testsuite failures for me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57304
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-linux |powerpc*-*-*
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57304
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57303
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
DSE has
/* If use_stmt is or might be a nop assignment, e.g. for
struct { ... } S a, b, *p; ...
b = a; b = b;
or
b = a; b = *p; where p might be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47254
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47254
--- Comment #3 from Shakthi Kannan ---
Sorry, I don't have a gcc.gnu.org account. Can you please change the status to
"Confirmed"?
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44317
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47254
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Shakthi Kannan from comment #3)
> Sorry, I don't have a gcc.gnu.org account. Can you please change the status
> to "Confirmed"?
It is easy to get one and it is needed for commit access:
ht
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56782
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57310
Bug ID: 57310
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] segfault with -O2 or higher
on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23684
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57311
Bug ID: 57311
Summary: Conversion operator can be overloaded with itself by
using typedef
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-inval
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51259
Shakthi Kannan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skannan at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57311
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
If the definitions are not inline G++ spots the problems:
typedef int Int;
struct X
{
operator int() const;
operator Int() const;
};
X::operator int() const { return 0; }
X::operator Int() const {
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57310
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51776
Shakthi Kannan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skannan at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57312
Bug ID: 57312
Summary: missing 'template' keyword not diagnosed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57293
Fanael changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i686-w64-mingw32|i?86-*-*
--- Comment #3 from Fanael ---
Reprodu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49928
Shakthi Kannan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skannan at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57312
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11814
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51908
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57312
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Thanks, Paolo, I thought there was an existing PR but failed to find it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57313
Bug ID: 57313
Summary: [4.9 Regression]: gcc.dg/binop-xor3.c
scan-tree-dump-times
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57313
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Created attachment 30140
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30140&action=edit
binop-xor3.s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57310
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57313
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
It was xfailed before. It started passing as a side effect of r198893 so I
removed the xfail, but apparently it now depends on the platform :-(
What do you get with -O -fdump-tree-original?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57309
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Can you isolate a testcase for the worst loop?
Not yet. It's one of these horrible gargantuan functions (leslie3d is one big
file and fluxi, fluxj, fluxk are all
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57313
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #2)
> What do you get with -O -fdump-tree-original?
I tried, and the transformation doesn't happen at all (I was wondering if it
might be undone by another pass later).
Se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57051
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri May 17 08:31:32 2013
New Revision: 199002
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199002&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/57051
* fold-const.c (const_binop) : Fix BYTES_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18126
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57067
gretay at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gretay at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57297
--- Comment #7 from gretay at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #5)
> Created attachment 30138 [details]
> frontend patch, second try
>
> This variant reduces the amount of VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, which should make the
> code l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57314
Bug ID: 57314
Summary: [SFINAE] GCC istantiates default-arguments for
member-template-functions of classtemplates bevore
allowed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57315
Bug ID: 57315
Summary: LTO and/or vectorizer performance regression on
salsa20 core, 4.7->4.8
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57313
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49146
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.2
--- Comment #8 from Richard Hen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57304
--- Comment #5 from Pat Haugen ---
The patch fixes the benchmark failure as well.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57316
Bug ID: 57316
Summary: [4.8 regresion] build failure in libsanitizer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sani
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57294
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57317
Bug ID: 57317
Summary: [4.8/4.9] Regression bogus and unsuppressable warning:
'YYY' has a base 'ZZZ' whose type uses the anonymous
namespace
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57317
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
Irrespective of the primary issue, in general giving names to warnings is a
good idea: what about other compilers?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45359
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46396
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57304
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
appears to hang gcc, although I suspect it is
actually just extremely slow.
This behavior is not present in 4.8 and older versions.
$ gcc-trunk -v
gcc version 4.9.0 20130517 (experimental) [trunk revision 199006] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk -Os hang.c
$ time gcc-4.8 -O2 hang.c
real0m0.101s
user
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57319
Bug ID: 57319
Summary: [4.8/4.9] Regression: bogus "defaulted move assignment
for ... calls a non-trivial move assignment operator
for virtual base ..."
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57318
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57276
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57320
Bug ID: 57320
Summary: Shrink-wrapping breaks graph dumping
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimizat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57320
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57294
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
> I've confirmed this is the case by putting a call to
> cgraph_rebuild_references into convert_callers_for_node and it "fixes"
> the issue. But of course that could be quite expensive.
Hmm, it is bit ugly to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57289
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
The problem is that the controlled_uses in descriptors of parameters
of function prespooles is streamed incorrectly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57321
Bug ID: 57321
Summary: static function call miscompiled at -Os and above
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57257
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56950
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57071
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 30141
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30141&action=edit
Another patch that doesn't work...
I tried to follow the advice in comment#9, but I hit a wall
(again).
With th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57071
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
Sorry, wrong PR for the comment.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 30142
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30142&action=edit
Another patch that doesn't work...
This time with the right PR...
I tried to follow the advice in comment#9, bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10207
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38312
Bud Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from
70 matches
Mail list logo
