http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57157
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2013-05-05 07:19:07
UTC ---
Created attachment 30033
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30033
fold_binary patch
A forwprop patch would be better, but this seems to work.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57027
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57172
vlukas at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vlukas at gmx dot de
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57172
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-05-05
09:53:27 UTC ---
*** Bug 53497 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53497
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57174
Bug #: 57174
Summary: RTE triggered by type component allocation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: fortran-dev
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54052
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
CC|b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55206
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever Confirmed|1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53150
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
--- Comment #3 from Paolo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53150
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55240
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yuzurufag+gcc at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57175
Bug #: 57175
Summary: NRVO and alignment
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57175
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56914
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2013-05-05
13:56:41 UTC ---
Please somebody confirm that the issue is actually fixed on i686 proper too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57176
Bug #: 57176
Summary: copy elision with function arguments passed by value
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: miss
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57141
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2013-05-05
14:04:42 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun May 5 14:01:38 2013
New Revision: 198609
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198609&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-05-05 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57141
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53308
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55773
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57177
Bug #: 57177
Summary: [SH] Improve integer division
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57178
Bug #: 57178
Summary: bogus warning with -O3 using boost::optional
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57178
--- Comment #1 from eda-qa at disemia dot com 2013-05-05 14:56:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 30034
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30034
example
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57179
Bug #: 57179
Summary: ICE on non-valid code with emplace_back
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53631
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjnxf at mailinator dot com
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57173
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56914
--- Comment #5 from VinÃcius dos Santos Oliveira 2013-05-05 18:32:14 UTC ---
I tried to reproduce the bug today and nothing happened. I'm still using GCC
4.8.0, but my system changed a lot (ArchLinux is a rolling release distro) and
I can't say w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57175
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57174
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57086
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cartonmartin+gcc_bugzilla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57179
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57178
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56914
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57175
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-05-05
23:34:52 UTC ---
Thanks Eric. Without further ado, I would simply encourage Marc to send a
patchlet to the mailing list (possibly with a nice testcase). Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57180
Bug #: 57180
Summary: Structures with a flexible arrray member have wrong
size
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55171
Steve K. Chiu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steve.k.chiu at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57121
--- Comment #10 from Netra
2013-05-06 01:27:13 UTC ---
Hi Andrew Pinski,
Could you please delete this bug?
Thanks,
Netra
-Original Message-
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [mailto:gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org]
Sent: Thursday,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57181
Bug #: 57181
Summary: Segfault when dealing with typedef of class stub and
nested array
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57182
Bug #: 57182
Summary: Documentation implies -fprofile-arcs required to
create .text.unlikely sections
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55303
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo 2013-05-06 05:48:18
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I will modify the attached patch so that it will allow only the HW clip
> constants for now.
This has been committed as rev 198617:
http://gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57182
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2013-05-06
06:08:22 UTC ---
I think the effective part is main part which says it will do it otherwise but
not automatically doing it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57183
Bug #: 57183
Summary: [C++11]auto and -Wunused-variable
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
41 matches
Mail list logo