http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46918
--- Comment #2 from Masaki MURANAKA 2013-04-22
07:01:39 UTC ---
This issue is caused by same reason in #48231
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57018
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57018
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-04-22
07:40:59 UTC ---
Even more reduced:
/* { dg-do run } */
/* { dg-options "-Os -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables" } */
/* { dg-additional-options "-march=i686" { target ia32 }
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56995
chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57018
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-04-22
08:10:04 UTC ---
In bar in the more reduced testcase, the second rep_movsi insn uses before
reload argp as the source address of the 16 byte copy. The argp to stack
pointer elimination offset i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57028
Bug #: 57028
Summary: [4.9 regression] Fortran bootstrap fails due to
missing zlib.h
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57018
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56990
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56957
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-04-22
09:48:37 UTC ---
I see some more ICEs of the same type while testing on ia64, so the patch might
not be enough in general, though it fixes the original test. I will need to
spend more time
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57010
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11582
--- Comment #8 from Gabriel Dos Reis 2013-04-22
10:10:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> The '[(((sizetype)) + 1)]' is just awful. If we don't know the
> actual type there, that is "int [size()]", then we should just print 'int []'
> o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11582
--- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-04-22
10:38:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Printing int[] or int[size_t] would be confusing too.
More confusing than int[(((sizetype)) + 1)] ?
What about?
t7881.cc: In function ‘void g()’:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56648
Lee Daniel Crocker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lee at piclab dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57028
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57027
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57026
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57029
Bug #: 57029
Summary: GCC doesn't set the inexact flag on inexact
compile-time int-to-float conversion
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57026
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2013-04-22
12:50:10 UTC ---
VRP does
setjmp (_3(ab));
- f_12 = (long unsigned int) d_1(ab);
...
- :
- _26 = (unsigned int) f_12;
+ :
+ _26 = d_1(ab);
*z_23(D) = _26;
that's obviously
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57029
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57029
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2013-04-22 13:07:07
UTC ---
There is -ftrapping-math, which I think is supposed to have an effect here. And
if this was implemented properly, I hope it would be turned off by default.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57029
--- Comment #3 from Vincent Lefèvre 2013-04-22
13:32:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> There is -ftrapping-math, which I think is supposed to have an effect here.
> And
> if this was implemented properly, I hope it would be turned off by de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener 2013-04-22
13:34:40 UTC ---
The testcase in the patch posted to the mailing list is
-- { dg-do compile }
with Ada.Streams;
package Array3 is
use type Ada.Streams.Stream_Element_Offset;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57018
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872
--- Comment #13 from Mikael Morin 2013-04-22
14:09:00 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Mon Apr 22 14:07:29 2013
New Revision: 198139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198139&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-04-22 Thomas Koenig
Mi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38449
--- Comment #6 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2013-04-22 14:10:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Can this new hook replace MD_CAN_REDIRECT_BRANCH?
I think so. I'll look into making a patch for that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56033
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-04-22
14:22:15 UTC ---
Following the recipe in comment #5, the following patch
diff -up /opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_struct_va1.c
/opt/gcc/work/libffi/testsuite/libffi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57032
Bug #: 57032
Summary: [4.9 Regression]: internal compiler error: Max. number
of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Versio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56935
--- Comment #6 from Yuri Rumyantsev 2013-04-22
14:46:16 UTC ---
Richard,
Sorry for troubles since we found out the real cause of performance degradation
- code layout was changed after your fix and it caused ~5% slowdown on
253.perlbmk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56935
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57032
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2013-04-22 15:20:38
UTC ---
For some reason, LRA does not fix-up (insn 12):
(insn 12 11 13 2 (set (reg/v:DI 72 [ hi ])
(unsigned_fix:DI (reg:DF 83 [ D.5360 ])))
../../../gcc-svn/trunk/libgcc/libgc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56990
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
from gfortran 4.9.0 20130422 (experimental) (GCC):
./gfortran /home/tschwarz/Developer/Fortran/ice.f95 -B
../i686-pc-linux-gnu/libgfortran -B ../gcc -L
../i686-pc-linux-gnu/libgfortran/.libs -L
../i686-pc-linux-gnu/libquadmath/.libs -v
Driving: ./gfortran /home/tschwarz/Developer/Fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57033
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57033
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Miles
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57003
--- Comment #6 from dank at kegel dot com 2013-04-22 16:39:37 UTC ---
You'd think... but I didn't find any obvious memcpy replacement.
I spent some time bisecting the wine source yesterday. There appear to be
at least three or four affect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56990
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek 2013-04-22
17:03:20 UTC ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Apr 22 17:02:49 2013
New Revision: 198147
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198147&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/56990
* tsan.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56990
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek 2013-04-22
17:14:14 UTC ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Apr 22 17:13:56 2013
New Revision: 198149
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198149&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/56990
* tsan.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56990
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57032
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57034
Bug #: 57034
Summary: ternary operator with float infinity in O0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57034
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Hite
2013-04-22 17:36:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 29915
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29915
unit test of bug + build instructions in comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57034
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2013-04-22
18:20:45 UTC ---
Is this on i686 (32bit)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57035
Bug #: 57035
Summary: TS29113's C535b: Wrongly accept DIMENSION(..) to
TRANSFER
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57036
Bug #: 57036
Summary: ice in update_ssa_across_abnormal_edges
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57034
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53685
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-22 19:23:37 UTC ---
Comment 7 is fixed on 4.9 trunk with the following commit:
Author: janus
Date: Mon Apr 22 19:14:22 2013
New Revision: 198155
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57022
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-22 19:25:38 UTC ---
Fixed on 4.9 trunk with the following commit:
Author: janus
Date: Mon Apr 22 19:14:22 2013
New Revision: 198155
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198155&root=gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57037
Bug #: 57037
Summary: GCC does not generate non-temporal stores on i386 with
SSE2+
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57032
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
Bug #: 57038
Summary: Latest libreoffice compilation fails with enabled LTO
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57039
Bug #: 57039
Summary: -Wsequence-point missing warning for such case
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55445
ray linn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ray_linn at hotmail dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11582
--- Comment #10 from Gabriel Dos Reis 2013-04-23
03:45:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > Printing int[] or int[size_t] would be confusing too.
>
> More confusing than int[(((sizetype)) + 1)] ?
>
> What about?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57040
Bug #: 57040
Summary: SEH Exception defined is conflicted with SJLJ Eception
within several files.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
56 matches
Mail list logo
