http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57000
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1
Summary|4.8 Reg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57000
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-04-19
07:29:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 29901
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29901
pr57000.ii
Somewhat reduced testcase (but sitll quite large).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53222
--- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan 2013-04-19
07:29:43 UTC ---
Created attachment 29902
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29902
namespace error after applying patch
Can you please provide the version of GCC that you us
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57000
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-04-19
07:44:54 UTC ---
reassoc clearly doesn't adjust the virtual ops, not sure if just on the pow*
handling, or everywhere, it expects the math builtin calls to have no vops.
As the vops are missing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53222
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |trivial
--- Comment #2 from Manuel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57000
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-04-19
08:03:34 UTC ---
Shorter testcase:
/* PR tree-optimization/57000 */
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-Ofast -frounding-math" } */
double baz (double foo, double bar)
{
return foo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56975
--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz 2013-04-19 08:18:13
UTC ---
At what place it freezes? Can you provide a testcase? Are you sure it is
really related to the patch? What makes you think that?
All in all, what I mean about those questions i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56999
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56999
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek 2013-04-19
08:19:50 UTC ---
Damn, wrong PR, sorry.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48189
--- Comment #14 from Marek Polacek 2013-04-19
08:20:11 UTC ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Apr 19 08:18:29 2013
New Revision: 198085
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198085&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2013
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48189
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57003
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56998
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57000
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56963
--- Comment #3 from Václav Zeman 2013-04-19
08:54:59 UTC ---
I have broken the file on the Google Drive. Here is another copy of the same:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-WkLJEfYmSEdTZvdFVRR0E0dEE/edit?usp=sharing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56988
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56944
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29900|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55933
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872
--- Comment #12 from Mikael Morin 2013-04-19
10:03:55 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Fri Apr 19 09:58:41 2013
New Revision: 198086
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198086&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-04-19 Thomas Koenig
Mi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57000
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |tree-optimization
Known to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38026
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56981
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57004
Bug #: 57004
Summary: False warning: comparison is always true due to
limited range of data type [-Wtype-limits]
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55793
--- Comment #3 from Jan Smets 2013-04-19
11:57:36 UTC ---
Can't confirm since the patch can not be applied to 4.6.
(Even though the branch is dead already..)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56718
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57004
Dinar Temirbulatov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dtemirbulatov at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57004
Julian Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jtaylor.debian at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56982
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
Summary|[4.8/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56944
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
s=c,c++,fortran
--with-gmp=/home/user/gcc-trunk/src/build/backends
--with-mpfr=/home/user/gcc-trunk/src/build/backends
--with-mpc=/home/user/gcc-trunk/src/build/backends
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20130419 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56975
--- Comment #8 from gee 2013-04-19 14:26:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 29904
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29904
Patch for supporting cygwin32's SYSV_ABI proper - Fixed a hunk fail
(In reply to comment #7)
> At wha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56944
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse 2013-04-19 15:11:58
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> For the vectorization, vectorizable_call should handle DF -> SI builtin
> vectorization, see e.g. how on i?86/x86_64 BUILT_IN_IFLOOR is vectorized.
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57006
Bug #: 57006
Summary: extend DWARF to indicate types coming from template
parameters
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53822
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-04-19
15:27:28 UTC ---
Makes sense to me and must be pretty easy to implement.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53924
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54311
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54377
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54948
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56289
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57004
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11582
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56412
--- Comment #5 from nightstrike 2013-04-19
17:46:37 UTC ---
CYGPATH_W gets set correctly, but libtool seems to ignore it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56975
--- Comment #9 from Dave Korn 2013-04-19 18:18:19
UTC ---
Kai's patch applied cleanly for me vs. Revision: 197992 and allowed my failed
build to proceed as far as stage 3 where it failed on libjava (known issue).
I'm going to rerun the bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57009
Bug #: 57009
Summary: Select best typed instruction for scalar bitwise
operations
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45424
Sean Santos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||quantheory at gmail dot com
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57010
Bug #: 57010
Summary: priority_queue calls self-move-assignment operator
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57011
Bug #: 57011
Summary: Compiling _GLIBCXX_CONCEPT_CHECKS rejects
vector>
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38026
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2013-04-20
01:54:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I can't repeat it
> with a revision near ToT,
I tested using r175148 on the 4.3-branch, in case it was unclear.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56263
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
49 matches
Mail list logo