[Bug tree-optimization/48642] ICE: in omega_add_zero_eq, at omega.h:259 with -O -fcheck-data-deps --param omega-max-eqs=0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48642 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/48482] ICE: in omega_alloc_problem, at omega.c:5498 with -fcheck-data-deps --param omega-max-vars=1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48482 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/56858] alpha looks for NOTE_INSN_EH_REGION notes that cannot exist

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56858 --- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2013-04-08 07:38:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > I can't test this because I have no access to alpha hardware. The testsuite results [1] are OK. [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-04

[Bug rtl-optimization/48182] ICE: SIGSEGV in try_crossjump_to_edge (cfgcleanup.c:1703) with --param min-crossjump-insns=0 on basic code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48182 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek 2013-04-08 07:46:04 UTC --- Author: mpolacek Date: Mon Apr 8 07:44:33 2013 New Revision: 197564 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197564&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/48182 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/48182] ICE: SIGSEGV in try_crossjump_to_edge (cfgcleanup.c:1703) with --param min-crossjump-insns=0 on basic code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48182 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek 2013-04-08 07:48:25 UTC --- Author: mpolacek Date: Mon Apr 8 07:47:21 2013 New Revision: 197565 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197565&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/48182 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/48182] ICE: SIGSEGV in try_crossjump_to_edge (cfgcleanup.c:1703) with --param min-crossjump-insns=0 on basic code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48182 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/48443] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: control flow in the middle of basic block with -fprefetch-loop-arrays --param l2-cache-size=0 and setjmp()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48443 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug inline-asm/43998] inline assembler: can't set clobbering for input register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43998 Ilya Lesokhin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ilya.lesokhin at gmail dot

[Bug c++/56871] [c++11] Specialization of constexpr Templated Function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56871 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Stat

[Bug preprocessor/47047] Support for path translation in __FILE__

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47047 --- Comment #6 from Joerg Sonnenberger 2013-04-08 08:11:45 UTC --- Nothing has changed. It likely needs updates to apply to GCC 4.8+, but the general functionality is still desirable, IMO.

[Bug fortran/56261] [OOP] seg fault call procedure pointer on polymorphic array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56261 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug middle-end/48579] ICE: verify_flow_info: too many outgoing branch edges from bb 3 with asm goto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48579 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/56113] out of memory when compiling a function with many goto labels (50k > )

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113 --- Comment #33 from Richard Biener 2013-04-08 08:37:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #32) > Hi, guys > > I have a couple of questions regarding the case. > > i) What is the current status of the fix? is this fixed or still open?

[Bug libstdc++/56785] std::tuple of two elements does not apply empty base class optimization when one of its elements is a std::tuple with two elements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56785 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c++/56871] [c++11] Specialization of constexpr Templated Function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56871 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug tree-optimization/48762] valgrind: Invalid read/write of size 8 in cse_main with -O --param max-cse-path-length=0 on basic code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48762 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/56848] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) with the 4.7.3 release candidate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56848 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/56851] Segmentation Error using -O3 optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56851 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/55964] [4.7 Regression] Segmentation fault with -O -ftree-loop-distribution -funswitch-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55964 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||john at jbeidl dot com --- Com

[Bug tree-optimization/56854] [4.9 Regression] error: non-decl/MEM_REF LHS in clobber statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56854 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |tree-optimization Target Mile

[Bug target/56863] cmpnltpd recognition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56863 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug c++/56869] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) Error reporting routines re-entered

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56869 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-42.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug target/56864] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76b.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug libffi/56033] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_struct_va1.c on powerpc-*-* and sparc-sun-solaris2* with -m64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56033 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug c++/56869] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) Error reporting routines re-entered

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56869 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose 2013-04-08 11:19:50 UTC --- Created attachment 29822 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29822 preprocessed source

[Bug c++/56869] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) Error reporting routines re-entered

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56869 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever Confirmed|

[Bug libffi/56033] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_struct_va1.c on powerpc-*-* and sparc-sun-solaris2* with -m64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56033 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel 2013-04-08 11:24:22 UTC --- Just noticed the example in libffi documentation which suggests that casting to the return type pointer should work: /* Acts like puts with the file given at time of enclosu

[Bug fortran/56872] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Incorrect SUM evaluation, involving implied-do loop, with -ffrontend-optimize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/56873] New: vector shift lowered to scalars

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56873 Bug #: 56873 Summary: vector shift lowered to scalars Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization

[Bug other/55274] gcc build hangs on HP-UX 11.11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55274 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56874] New: Argument deduction failure with lambda and default template argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56874 Bug #: 56874 Summary: Argument deduction failure with lambda and default template argument Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug target/56875] New: vax target miscompiles short negative constants for 64bit values

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56875 Bug #: 56875 Summary: vax target miscompiles short negative constants for 64bit values Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UN

[Bug tree-optimization/48762] valgrind: Invalid read/write of size 8 in cse_main with -O --param max-cse-path-length=0 on basic code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48762 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Version|4.7.

[Bug fortran/56867] Missing temporary with string array assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56867 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c++/56874] Argument deduction failure with lambda and default template argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56874 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-04-08 12:21:29 UTC --- Possibly a dup of PR 52072 (and PR 53446)

[Bug c++/56874] Argument deduction failure due to non-deduced context

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56874 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Argument deduction failure |Argument deduction failure

[Bug c++/34949] Dead code in empty destructors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50243] vtable for pure abstract class (interface) shouldn't be emitted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50243 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/56812] Simple loop is not SLP-vectorized after r196872

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56812 --- Comment #12 from Yuri Rumyantsev 2013-04-08 14:03:45 UTC --- Richard, We found out another issue related to your fix (r196872), namely for the attached test-case t1.c function vect_gen_niters_for_prolog_loop() uses non-invariant poi

[Bug tree-optimization/56812] Simple loop is not SLP-vectorized after r196872

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56812 --- Comment #13 from Yuri Rumyantsev 2013-04-08 14:05:26 UTC --- Created attachment 29824 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29824 testcase The following optins were used to compile on x86: -O3 -funroll-loops -ffast

[Bug fortran/56872] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Incorrect SUM evaluation, involving implied-do loop, with -ffrontend-optimize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/56854] [4.9 Regression] error: non-decl/MEM_REF LHS in clobber statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56854 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug rtl-optimization/56876] New: Combine does not invent new moves

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56876 Bug #: 56876 Summary: Combine does not invent new moves Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization

[Bug target/56858] alpha looks for NOTE_INSN_EH_REGION notes that cannot exist

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56858 --- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson 2013-04-08 14:35:03 UTC --- They did used to exist during mach_reorg; they used to exist at rtl creation time. You cannot simply delete the code either, that produces wrong-code wrt fp exceptions. Of

[Bug lto/56877] New: When using LTO and linking statically, coredumps contain unusable stack trace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56877 Bug #: 56877 Summary: When using LTO and linking statically, coredumps contain unusable stack trace Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug lto/56877] When using LTO and linking statically, coredumps contain unusable stack trace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56877 --- Comment #1 from Dror Levin 2013-04-08 14:54:42 UTC --- Created attachment 29825 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29825 Simple program that generates coredump (using assert(0))

[Bug c++/56874] Argument deduction failure due to non-deduced context

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56874 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug tree-optimization/56854] [4.9 Regression] error: non-decl/MEM_REF LHS in clobber statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56854 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-04-08 15:03:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > So like this? > > Reducing testcase now... > > --- tree-ssa-forwprop.c.jj12013-02-25 23:51:21.0 +0100 > +++ tree-ssa-forwprop.c2013-04-

[Bug tree-optimization/56812] Simple loop is not SLP-vectorized after r196872

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56812 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener 2013-04-08 15:04:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > Created attachment 29824 [details] > testcase > > The following optins were used to compile on x86: > > -O3 -funroll-loops -ffast-math -marc

[Bug lto/56877] When using LTO and linking statically, coredumps contain unusable stack trace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56877 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/55524] If fnma exists but not fms, convert_mult_to_fma should prefer to former over the latter.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55524 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 f

[Bug c++/56869] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) Error reporting routines re-entered

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56869 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Stat

[Bug target/56564] movdqa on possibly-8-byte-aligned struct with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56564 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassi

[Bug target/56858] alpha looks for NOTE_INSN_EH_REGION notes that cannot exist

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56858 --- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher 2013-04-08 15:32:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > They did used to exist during mach_reorg; they used to exist at rtl > creation time. You cannot simply delete the code either, that produces > wr

[Bug lto/56877] When using LTO and linking statically, coredumps contain unusable stack trace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56877 --- Comment #3 from Dror Levin 2013-04-08 15:36:11 UTC --- Using: - binutils 2.23.2, GNU ld - glibc 2.17 - x86_64, linux 3.8 - Arch linux Anything else that may be relevant?

[Bug tree-optimization/56878] New: Issue with candidate choice in vect_gen_niters_for_prolog_loop.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56878 Bug #: 56878 Summary: Issue with candidate choice in vect_gen_niters_for_prolog_loop. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCON

[Bug tree-optimization/56878] Issue with candidate choice in vect_gen_niters_for_prolog_loop.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56878 --- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev 2013-04-08 15:47:05 UTC --- Created attachment 29826 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29826 testcase Need to be compiled on x86 with the following options: -O3 -funroll-loops -ffas

[Bug tree-optimization/56812] Simple loop is not SLP-vectorized after r196872

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56812 --- Comment #15 from Yuri Rumyantsev 2013-04-08 15:48:45 UTC --- New bug has been opened for it: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56878

[Bug target/56858] alpha looks for NOTE_INSN_EH_REGION notes that cannot exist

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56858 --- Comment #7 from Richard Henderson 2013-04-08 15:52:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Do you recall when that was? Must have been long, long ago... > I've tried to find where it happened, and the rewrite was done before > at least

[Bug c/52773] internal error: in replace_pseudos_in, at reload1.c:577

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52773 --- Comment #3 from Alan Hourihane 2013-04-08 15:52:47 UTC --- I can't build 4.7.2 on an m68k box because of this one.

[Bug target/56876] Combine does not invent new moves

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56876 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|target --- Comment #1 from Andr

[Bug fortran/56872] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Incorrect SUM evaluation, involving implied-do loop, with -ffrontend-optimize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug c++/56879] New: -Weffc++ warns about non-virtual base class destructor even if it is protected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56879 Bug #: 56879 Summary: -Weffc++ warns about non-virtual base class destructor even if it is protected Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug fortran/56872] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Incorrect SUM evaluation, involving implied-do loop, with -ffrontend-optimize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-08 16:39:10 UTC --- Front-end optimization generates for print *,SUM([(s**(REAL(k-1)/REAL(m-1)),k=1,m)]) the code: D.1918 = s; D.1919 = __builtin_powf (D.1918, (((real(kind=4)) (k + -1) /

[Bug c/56880] New: R_X86_64_COPY bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56880 Bug #: 56880 Summary: R_X86_64_COPY bug Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug other/56881] New: Miscompilation (optimisation failure?) causing NULL dereference and segfault at runtime

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56881 Bug #: 56881 Summary: Miscompilation (optimisation failure?) causing NULL dereference and segfault at runtime Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug c/56880] R_X86_64_COPY bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56880 --- Comment #1 from Fredrick 2013-04-08 16:51:06 UTC --- Another related bug would be that, we tried to disable copy relocation using -z nocopyreloc. The binary crashed with SEGV. ./test_misc.bin: Symbol `test_dynamic' causes overflow

[Bug c/52773] internal error: in replace_pseudos_in, at reload1.c:577

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52773 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-04-08 17:11:50 UTC --- The ICE still occurs with gcc 4.6-20130405, 4.7-20130406, 4.8-20130404, and 4.9-20130407.

[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 pdande1 at dow dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pdande1 at dow dot com

[Bug c++/56879] -Weffc++ warns about non-virtual base class destructor even if it is protected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56879 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29827|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|

[Bug c++/56874] Argument deduction failure due to non-deduced context

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56874 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52072] Several non-deduced contexts not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52072 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 --- Comment #2 from Harald Anlauf 2013-04-08 17:29:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > program characterconversions > integer :: i=123 > character(len=*) :: s > write(s,*) i > print *,s > end program > > I am getti

[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 --- Comment #3 from pdande1 at dow dot com 2013-04-08 17:41:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > program characterconversions > > integer :: i=123 > > character(len=*) :: s > > write(s,*) i > >

[Bug c++/56871] [c++11] Specialization of constexpr Templated Function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56871 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/55901] [OOP] type is (character(len=*)) misinterpreted as array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901 --- Comment #4 from Harald Anlauf 2013-04-08 18:16:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > I am newbie to fortran, Can you please explain me in detail with an example. > > Thanks in advance Replace character(len=*) :: s in you

[Bug fortran/56872] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Incorrect SUM evaluation, involving implied-do loop, with -ffrontend-optimize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/56858] alpha looks for NOTE_INSN_EH_REGION notes that cannot exist

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56858 --- Comment #8 from Steven Bosscher 2013-04-08 18:43:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Do you recall when that was? Must have been long, long ago... > > I've tried to find where it happened, and the rewrit

[Bug c/56882] New: ICE: when compiling gegl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56882 Bug #: 56882 Summary: ICE: when compiling gegl Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/56879] -Weffc++ warns about non-virtual base class destructor even if it is protected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56879 --- Comment #2 from alex 2013-04-08 19:06:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Comment on attachment 29827 [details] > test source code and compiler output > > The solution is simple: don't use -Weffc++, it's deeply flawed. Using it wit

[Bug target/56858] alpha looks for NOTE_INSN_EH_REGION notes that cannot exist

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56858 --- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson 2013-04-08 19:27:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > The part of alpha EH that depends on the notes must have been been > broken since than, more than 12 years. Without anyone noticing... Sure.

[Bug target/56858] alpha looks for NOTE_INSN_EH_REGION notes that cannot exist

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56858 --- Comment #10 from stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com 2013-04-08 19:42:51 UTC --- > Sure. Do you know any package that combines C++ EH with IEEE exceptions? > I don't. In fact, I don't actually know of a package that wants to enable > trappin

[Bug lto/54095] Unnecessary static variable renaming

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095 --- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka 2013-04-08 19:49:49 UTC --- Created attachment 29830 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29830 Complette patchet I am attaching patch to reduce renaming. It hits few can of worms, so I w

[Bug fortran/56872] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Incorrect SUM evaluation, involving implied-do loop, with -ffrontend-optimize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/56858] alpha looks for NOTE_INSN_EH_REGION notes that cannot exist

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56858 --- Comment #11 from Richard Henderson 2013-04-08 20:09:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Removing the notes entirely is the goal eventually, but I'd settle for > making them local to final.c for now. Hmm. Well, assuming we want

[Bug fortran/56872] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Incorrect SUM evaluation, involving implied-do loop, with -ffrontend-optimize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-08 20:10:54 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Apr 8 19:36:43 2013 New Revision: 197610 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197610&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-04-08 Thomas Koenig PR

[Bug fortran/56872] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Incorrect SUM evaluation, involving implied-do loop, with -ffrontend-optimize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-08 20:11:12 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Apr 8 20:01:33 2013 New Revision: 197612 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197612&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-04-08 Thomas Koenig PR

[Bug fortran/56872] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Incorrect SUM evaluation, involving implied-do loop, with -ffrontend-optimize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-08 20:12:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Fixed on trunk and 4.8. > Thanks a lot for the bug report, and sorry for the breakage. Thanks for the patch, Thomas. But please remember to also co

[Bug fortran/56849] Missing compile-time shape check for RESHAPE assignments with an ORDER= attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56849 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-08 20:13:47 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sun Apr 7 08:41:17 2013 New Revision: 197550 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197550&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-04-07 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/56849] Missing compile-time shape check for RESHAPE assignments with an ORDER= attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56849 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/56867] Missing temporary with string array assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56867 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-08 20:23:59 UTC --- I stumbled across this while looking at PR 30398, when I wanted to add some dependency checking to make call memcpy instead of memmove if there was no dependency. Look for a

[Bug fortran/56594] Invalid read of size 1 for gfortran.dg/realloc_on_assign_5.f03

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56594 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/47674] gfortran.dg/realloc_on_assign_5.f03: Segfault at run time for deferred (allocatable) string length

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47674 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- C

[Bug c++/56883] New: error openmp parallel for order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56883 Bug #: 56883 Summary: error openmp parallel for order Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3

[Bug target/56866] gcc 4.7.x/gcc-4.8.x with '-O3 -march=bdver2' misscompiles glibc-2.17/crypt/sha512.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56866 --- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2013-04-08 21:26:51 UTC --- > Created attachment 29820 [details] > tar-file with small set of c-files to reproduce the problem I can't recreate the problem with your script (to compile successfully, I rem

[Bug inline-asm/56884] New: ARM thumb16 mnemonic lsls not recognized for CPU cortex-m0.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56884 Bug #: 56884 Summary: ARM thumb16 mnemonic lsls not recognized for CPU cortex-m0. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFI

[Bug inline-asm/56884] ARM thumb16 mnemonic lsls not recognized for CPU cortex-m0.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56884 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/56880] R_X86_64_COPY bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56880 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/28865] Structures with a flexible arrray member have wrong .size

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28865 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fredrickprashanth at gmail

  1   2   >