http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50200
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
Igor Zamyatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-04
07:37:01 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Apr 4 07:22:24 2013
New Revision: 197468
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197468&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-04-04 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56837
Bug #: 56837
Summary: -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns generates incorrect
code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2013-04-04
07:40:15 UTC ---
197374 PASS
197375 FAIL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56837
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Severity|ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56837
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56837
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
--- Comment #29 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-04-04
08:25:08 UTC ---
Reduced testcase for -O3:
struct E {};
struct A
{
virtual void a (void *) = 0;
};
struct B
{
virtual ~B () {};
unsigned int b1;
E **b2;
A *b3;
};
struct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56837
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2013-04-04
08:32:35 UTC ---
Testcase
extern "C" void abort (void);
extern "C" int memcmp (const void *, const void *, __SIZE_TYPE__);
bool b1[8];
bool b2[8] = { true, true, true, true, true, true, t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56822
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-04-04
08:36:52 UTC ---
You could have simply updated this report instead of creating a new one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-04
08:38:00 UTC ---
2013-04-04 Tobias Burnus
Backport from mainline:
2013-03-28 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/56735
* io/list_read.c (nml_query): Only abort
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56835
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735
--- Comment #14 from Adam Williams 2013-04-04
08:41:32 UTC ---
Thanks for all your help
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56728
--- Comment #3 from npl at chello dot at 2013-04-04 09:13:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Fixed for 4.8.1.
Is it already in trunk?
Fixed the ICE or disallowing the wrong constexpr - I guess I have a few of
these?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48189
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
--- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-04-04
09:20:36 UTC ---
Ah, I guess it is sink_clobbers, which would need to be tought to drop MEM_REF
clobbers instead of sinking them if the target bb is no longer dominated by the
bb with the SSA_N
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56737
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-04
09:32:14 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Apr 4 09:31:53 2013
New Revision: 197474
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197474&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libgfortran/
2013-04-04 Tobias Burnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56728
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2013-04-04
09:34:58 UTC ---
If it's fixed for 4.8.1 it's obviously fixed in mainline too. We don't ICE
anymore, we simply reject the snippet due to the reinterpret_cast from integer
to pointer.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56812
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab 2013-04-04 09:35:51
UTC ---
The test is failing on ia64:
$ grep basic slp-pr56812.cc.115t.slp
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20130404/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/slp-pr56812.cc:16: note:
not vectorized
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56737
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
-04-04
> 09:35:51 UTC ---
> The test is failing on ia64:
>
> $ grep basic slp-pr56812.cc.115t.slp
> /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20130404/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/slp-pr56812.cc:16: note:
> not vectorized: unsupported alignment in basic block.
Does adding
/* { dg-require-eff
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56838
Bug #: 56838
Summary: GCC svn doesn't compile libreoffice 4.0.1.2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53786
Hristo Venev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.1 |4.9.0
Summary|[C++11] alias te
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53786
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56815
--- Comment #21 from Paolo Carlini 2013-04-04
10:12:11 UTC ---
Manuel, I'm adding the LangEnabledBy, to match the documentation. Thanks.
Now, I'm not sure to understand the existing lines (many):
pedantic ? OPT_Wpedantic : OPT_Wpoint
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56815
--- Comment #22 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-04-04
10:38:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> Manuel, I'm adding the LangEnabledBy, to match the documentation. Thanks.
>
> Now, I'm not sure to understand the existing lines (many):
>
> ped
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56839
Bug #: 56839
Summary: make check: FAIL: go/types
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56737
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Hogg 2013-04-04
10:43:02 UTC ---
Thanks for fixing this. The code in question has been moved to use 'strings'
rather than Hollerith i/o - we aim for it to be F95 compliant anyway!
Jonathan.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56839
Markus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56839
--- Comment #2 from Markus 2013-04-04 10:50:02
UTC ---
Build of gcc 4.8.0 with go support worked, but make check failed.
The test which failed is "go/types".
In the description is the relevant part of the output from make check.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56213
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56837
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48189
--- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek 2013-04-04
11:05:08 UTC ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Apr 4 11:03:11 2013
New Revision: 197478
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197478&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56826
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56826
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2013-04-04
11:12:56 UTC ---
Testcase:
extern void abort (void);
typedef struct {
int a[3];
int num;
} t1;
t1 B[100];
int A[300];
void __attribute__((noinline,noclone))
bar (int *A, t1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56810
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-04
11:24:58 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Apr 4 11:24:15 2013
New Revision: 197479
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197479&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-04-04 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56810
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56826
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-04-04
11:41:03 UTC ---
Ok, the bug is that 'ncopies' in vect_build_slp_tree is not computed correctly.
I can trivially incrementally improve it but the ultimate fix is to delay
the checks done for ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56781
--- Comment #2 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2013-04-04 11:41:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Please try
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=61be6ebfe22f9ce5799dac2679541911eb744a86
> http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48184
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52436
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse 2013-04-04 12:07:53
UTC ---
For the rest of the discussion, see the thread starting here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00169.html
In particular, the folding should be done in gimple only (m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56728
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-04
12:28:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> If it's fixed for 4.8.1 it's obviously fixed in mainline too. We don't ICE
> anymore, we simply reject the snippet due to the reinterpret_cast from in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56728
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2013-04-04
12:50:25 UTC ---
Thanks Jason. Damn, we badly need to restore svn commit logs going
automatically to Bugzilla.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
--- Comment #31 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-04-04
12:52:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 29803
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29803
gcc49-pr34949.patch
Untested fix (and enhancement too).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56213
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48304
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56838
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56840
Bug #: 56840
Summary: a.out aborts instead of catching exception with -flto
and -static-libstdc++
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56841
Bug #: 56841
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ld: Unsatisfied symbol
"__atomic_exchange_8" in file
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/prev-hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc+
+-v3/src/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56842
Bug #: 56842
Summary: Argument deduction failure note is empty for alias
template
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56840
--- Comment #1 from Werner 2013-04-04 14:36:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 29805
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29805
generated with c++ -save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56840
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48186
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56843
Bug #: 56843
Summary: PowerPC Newton-Raphson reciprocal estimates can be
improved
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56826
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56843
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu |powerpc*-*-*
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56841
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48186
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek 2013-04-04
15:49:00 UTC ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Apr 4 15:48:25 2013
New Revision: 197487
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197487&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/48186
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40119
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48186
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48186
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek 2013-04-04
15:53:25 UTC ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Apr 4 15:52:54 2013
New Revision: 197488
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197488&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/48186
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48186
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56841
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-04-04 15:57:16 UTC ---
On 4-Apr-13, at 11:41 AM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Drat, I completely forgot these still aren't available everywhere,
> sorry.
There's some kind of im
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46501
Joe Turner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joe at oampo dot co.uk
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56843
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt 2013-04-04
16:12:31 UTC ---
Regarding the last point, I found this in the user manual:
"The double-precision square root estimate instructions are not generated by
default on low-precision machines, since
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56838
--- Comment #2 from Hristo Venev 2013-04-04
16:17:04 UTC ---
The candidate in /usr/include/boost/bind/bind.hpp:1478 a.cpp:92092 fails.
SFINAE so this candidate is skipped.
However the one in /usr/include/boost/bind/bind_cc.hpp:35 a.cpp:921
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56844
Bug #: 56844
Summary: Loop condition wrongly optimized from < to !=
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56844
--- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher 2013-04-04
16:33:50 UTC ---
Smells like http://blog.regehr.org/archives/918
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56844
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56844
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56840
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53786
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56812
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab 2013-04-04 17:24:14
UTC ---
Yes, that will skip the test.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2013-04-04
18:27:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 29806
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29806
ICE with -O1 only
$ g++ -Wall -O1 -fpreprocessed -c 56830.ii
56830.ii: In instantiation of ‘v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113
--- Comment #32 from Kangkook 2013-04-04 18:31:19
UTC ---
Hi, guys
I have a couple of questions regarding the case.
i) What is the current status of the fix? is this fixed or still open?
ii) If it is fixed,
- how many nodes no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2013-04-04
18:45:56 UTC ---
strictly speaking this is 'pre-4.8.0' regression
gcc version 4.8.0 20130313 (experimental) [trunk revision 196628] (GCC)
$ /usr/local/gcc_current_196628/bin/g++ -Wall -O1 -fp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56830
--- Comment #8 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2013-04-04
18:50:49 UTC ---
You are right, sounds like PR34949
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56845
Bug #: 56845
Summary: [OOP] _vptr not set to declared type for CLASS + SAVE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40881
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04 19:23:26 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=197495
2013-04-04 Janus Weil
PR fortran/40881
* match.c (gfc_match_return): Remove standard not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40881
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
Bug #: 56846
Summary: _Unwind_Backtrace on ARM and noexcept
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56845
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04 20:15:07 UTC ---
Huh, funny. I thought we were doing this already.
Also there is a piece of code in gfc_trans_deferred_vars (trans-decl.c) which
claims to do exactly this (AFAICS). No
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56845
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-04 21:01:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Also there is a piece of code in gfc_trans_deferred_vars (trans-decl.c) which
> claims to do exactly this (AFAICS). No idea why it is not in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56845
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56847
Bug #: 56847
Summary: '-fpie' triggers - internal compiler error: in
gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4705
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56847
--- Comment #1 from Han Shen 2013-04-04 23:31:02
UTC ---
Created attachment 29807
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29807
test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
incrediball changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter at axium dot co.nz
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56847
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56847
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56847
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek 2013-04-05
05:28:21 UTC ---
Slightly reduced.
struct S { long int a, b; };
extern struct S e;
void
foo (void)
{
static __thread struct S s = { 0, 0 };
s = e;
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56847
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48188
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56847
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56847
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Component|target
100 matches
Mail list logo
