http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56785
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2013-03-30 09:06:44
UTC ---
I assume (needs to be checked) this is related to the issue, reported
elsewhere, that makes the size of
std::tuple>>> grow linearly with the nesting
depth.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50829
--- Comment #13 from Marc Glisse 2013-03-30
10:13:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Created attachment 28846 [details]
> Use subreg
The patch was submitted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-03/msg00683.html and rejected, s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56786
Bug #: 56786
Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Namelist read fails with
designators containing embedded spaces
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52512
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2013-03-30
10:18:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> This bug fixed by Tilo's patch.
> Closing.
Jerry, please read the PRs carefully before you close them. The issue in
mentioned in comment 4 is not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56743
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2013-03-30
10:47:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 29752
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29752
Test case - please read comment in the file or comment 4
The test case is successful with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56721
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48326
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-03-30
11:59:19 UTC ---
I can reproduce the initial bug with gcc 4.4.7, 4.5.3, 4.6.3, and 4.7.0, but
not with 4.5.4, 4.6-20130322, 4.7.1, or 4.7.2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56783
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48326
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-03-30
12:31:38 UTC ---
The initial bug was fixed by r187169 on 4.7 branch, I'd say it's clearly a dup
of PR53228.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952
--- Comment #15 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-03-30
12:32:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> I guess the C/C++ FEs could for non-trivial string literals put into a hash
> table mapping from locus_t (of ADDR_EXPR around STRING_CST) to the fir
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952
--- Comment #16 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-03-30
12:32:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 29753
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29753
loc_token_hash
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joseph at codesourcery dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952
--- Comment #18 from stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com 2013-03-30 12:54:12 UTC ---
> * It would be extremely nice to update the testsuite to check the locations
> are
> correct. This is unfortunately a lot of boring work, so if I cannot get help
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952
--- Comment #19 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-03-30
13:26:19 UTC ---
Unfortunately, there are some stuff like this:
BLK
size
unit size
align 8 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x770945
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56660
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56783
--- Comment #9 from Dick Guertin 2013-03-30
14:52:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > First, my apology for not giving the gdp version. I assume you meant this:
> > GNU gdb 6.3.50-20050815 (Apple version gd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56787
Bug #: 56787
Summary: 4.8.0 Vectorization Regression Compared to 4.7.2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2013-03-30
15:00:11 UTC ---
The issue has been fixed on the 4.9 development branch - and it is scheduled
for backporting to the 4.6, 4.7 and 4.8 release branches.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBina
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952
--- Comment #20 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-03-30
15:02:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> > * It would be extremely nice to update the testsuite to check the locations
> > are
> > correct. This is unfortunately a lot of boring work, so i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952
--- Comment #21 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-03-30
15:03:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 29755
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29755
add locations and offsets to format warnings
My current patch, untested except for a few tes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735
--- Comment #9 from Adam Williams 2013-03-30
18:42:44 UTC ---
This is great. I look forward to testing when I get a chance to build from the
latest dev branch. I understand what you mean with the "?", however they are
being used in a compl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56788
Bug #: 56788
Summary: _mm_frcz_sd and _mm_frcz_ss ignore their second
argument
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56788
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2013-03-30 20:42:51
UTC ---
_mm_frcz_ss is inconsistent between compilers. Microsoft gives it 2 arguments
and movss-like semantics, whereas clang gives it a single argument. AMD doesn't
document intrinsics,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51440
--- Comment #5 from Martin Richtarsky 2013-03-30
22:06:48 UTC ---
Hi Manuel,
thanks for the pointers how to add the optional warning. I will try to submit a
patch, however first I would like to understand what is going on exactly:
- t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
Bug #: 56789
Summary: Wrong code with contiguous dummy argument
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56790
Bug #: 56790
Summary: VEC_COND_EXPR not constant folded
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56714
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56714
--- Comment #2 from Gerald Pfeifer 2013-03-30
23:35:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 29756
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29756
Pre-processed source aatree.ii
All those always_inline attributes seem to come from libitm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56791
Bug #: 56791
Summary: Segmentation fault in stage2 gengenrtl -- Incorrect
instruction sequence generated by reload
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8
31 matches
Mail list logo
