http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56671
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-03-21 08:31:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 29703
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29703
callgraph
Looks like a bug in constant expression handling.
perf shows:
15.51%
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56672
Bug #: 56672
Summary: Bad optimization
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56673
Bug #: 56673
Summary: multi-versioning not GC safe
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56672
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2013-03-21 09:21:59
UTC ---
A program that depends on undefined behaviour cannot be correct.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656
--- Comment #14 from Uros Bizjak 2013-03-21 09:40:13
UTC ---
Fixed for good.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56672
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36996
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener 2013-03-21
09:59:24 UTC ---
*** Bug 56672 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
/gnu/gcc_trunk/install
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --disable-multilib --enable-plugins
--enable-lto --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20130321 (experimental) [trunk revision 196847] (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-shared-libgcc' '-mtune=g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56674
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56675
Bug #: 56675
Summary: I/O: Check edit descriptors with READ/WRITE used in
FORMAT statements
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56674
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56676
Bug #: 56676
Summary: unnecesary splitted load when using avx2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56677
Bug #: 56677
Summary: [ratio] : ratio_multiply, ratio_divide, etc results
doesnt verify as __is_ratio
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56677
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-21
13:17:15 UTC ---
This is because ratio_divide is a struct, as required by earlier C++0x drafts,
not an alias template as required by the final standard. It's already fixed for
4.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56676
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener 2013-03-21
13:30:42 UTC ---
I believe we split unaligned loads by default because that's faster for generic
tuning.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56677
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Known to wo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56677
--- Comment #3 from npl at chello dot at 2013-03-21 14:38:48 UTC ---
Thanks, this did not occur to me.
Still, wouldnt it be relatively easy to adopt the __is_ratio function to check
for the ::type instead?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56674
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56676
--- Comment #2 from Ondrej Bilka 2013-03-21 14:53:26
UTC ---
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:30:42PM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56676
>
>
>
> --- Comment #1 from Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56676
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2013-03-21
15:11:14 UTC ---
Well, while true we don't adjust tuning based on that. Use -march=core-avx2
instead.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56678
Bug #: 56678
Summary: [c++11] non-uglified name in
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56676
Igor Zamyatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56679
Bug #: 56679
Summary: [C++11] Cannot take sizeof... a template template
parameter pack
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.4
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56680
Bug #: 56680
Summary: ICE for spec2K's 178.galgel and 200.sixtrack for
x86_64 at O3
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56677
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-21
15:35:46 UTC ---
That wouldn't help. The requirement is that the Period template argument is a
ratio. In GCC 4.7 ratio_divide is not a ratio. Whether ratio_divide::type is a
ratio or not does
del: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20130321 (experimental) [trunk revision 196847] (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-O3' '-v' '-shared-libgcc' '-mtune=generic'
'-march=x86-64'
/data/vjoost/gnu/gcc_trunk/install/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.9.0/f951
bug.f9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49802
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56681
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56682
Bug #: 56682
Summary: -fsanitize documentation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56681
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-03-21
17:56:41 UTC ---
If I am not mistaken, this PR seems to have been fixed between revisions 196859
(broken) and 196877 (OK).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35203
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36282
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56683
Bug #: 56683
Summary: Function types with different language linkages not
distinct
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56683
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2316
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jed at 59A2 dot org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-21
20:02:55 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 21 17:36:47 2013
New Revision: 196887
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=196887&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/48087
* diagnost
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55608
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-21
20:03:19 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 21 17:35:39 2013
New Revision: 196886
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=196886&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/55608
* dwarf2out.c (t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39326
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56684
Bug #: 56684
Summary: [4.8 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: unexpected expression
'T' of kind template_parm_index
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56684
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8.0 |4.9.0
Summary|[4.8 Reg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56305
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56685
Bug #: 56685
Summary: default template parameter cannot precede a
non-default template parameter in a function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56686
Bug #: 56686
Summary: gcc cannot find include header file
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56686
--- Comment #1 from Pan Ruochen 2013-03-22
02:18:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 29706
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29706
testcase
Testcase for this bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56686
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |preprocessor
Host|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56686
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
47 matches
Mail list logo
