http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56566
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-18
07:10:41 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 18 07:10:33 2013
New Revision: 196767
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196767
Log:
PR c/56566
* tree.c (tree_int_c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56648
Bug #: 56648
Summary: ignored by target warning not triggered by -fpic but
by -fPIC
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56635
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56496
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39326
--- Comment #49 from Richard Biener 2013-03-18
08:43:08 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 18 08:42:57 2013
New Revision: 196768
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196768
Log:
2013-03-18 Richard Biener
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56635
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-18
08:46:43 UTC ---
Even more reduced (-O3):
struct A { _Complex double a; };
void
foo (A **x, A **y)
{
A r;
if (__real__ x[0]->a)
{
r.a = y[0]->a / x[0]->a;
**x = r;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113
--- Comment #30 from Richard Biener 2013-03-18
08:47:02 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 18 08:46:44 2013
New Revision: 196769
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196769
Log:
2013-03-18 Richard Biener
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713
--- Comment #33 from Richard Biener 2013-03-18
08:53:51 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 18 08:53:42 2013
New Revision: 196771
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196771
Log:
2013-03-18 Richard Biener
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56649
Bug #: 56649
Summary: ICE gfc_conv_structure with MERGE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56635
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56650
Bug #: 56650
Summary: Odd error messages with C_SIZEOF
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56650
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56647
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #5 from J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56651
Bug #: 56651
Summary: sin() and tan() has different values during compile
time and run time.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54627
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #1 from S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56651
--- Comment #1 from sergey.s at samsung dot com 2013-03-18 09:50:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 29690
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29690
Source code with tangent test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56113
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||47344
Depends on|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54627
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Richar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55977
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-03-18 10:16:07 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Mar 18 10:15:56 2013
New Revision: 196774
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196774
Log:
2013-03-18 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56634
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-apple-darwin9.8.0
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56483
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-03-18
10:29:58 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 18 10:29:43 2013
New Revision: 196776
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196776
Log:
2013-03-18 Richard Biener
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56483
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56210
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener 2013-03-18
10:33:27 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 18 10:33:11 2013
New Revision: 196777
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196777
Log:
2013-03-18 Richard Biener
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56651
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932
--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka 2013-03-18 11:04:58
UTC ---
> Since very recently (between 20130313 and 20130315) gfortran.dg/do_1.f90
> execution started to XPASS not only at -O0/-O1, but at every optimisation
> level.
> I think it woul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56651
--- Comment #3 from sergey.s at samsung dot com 2013-03-18 11:06:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> For what target is this?
x86, host also is x86.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56639
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56640
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56642
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56644
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56645
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener 2013-03-18
11:20:12 UTC ---
I think the issue is that
checking for /c/Devel/gcc-cvs.not/build_native/./gcc/xgcc
-B/c/Devel/gcc-cvs.not/build_native/./gcc/
-L/c/Devel/gcc-cvs.not/build_native/mingw32/wi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56645
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56646
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56651
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56470
--- Comment #9 from Richard Earnshaw 2013-03-18
11:52:15 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Mon Mar 18 11:52:08 2013
New Revision: 196780
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196780
Log:
PR target/56470
* arm.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56470
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56652
Bug #: 56652
Summary: Wrong code in O2 - if in inline function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56652
--- Comment #1 from dominik.siatkowski at aldec dot com.pl 2013-03-18 12:05:05
UTC ---
Created attachment 29691
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29691
example
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56652
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56652
--- Comment #3 from dominik.siatkowski at aldec dot com.pl 2013-03-18 12:16:35
UTC ---
Is seems its 4.7 reggresion.
Example works if compiled with 4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-03-18
12:16:59 UTC ---
> Yes. I hope this variant should work better (regtesting now):
It "works better", but still has regressions:
[macbook] f90/bug% gfc /opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/gfort
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56652
--- Comment #4 from dominik.siatkowski at aldec dot com.pl 2013-03-18 12:24:17
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Quick check with clang -fsanitize=undefined shows:
> ...
> numeric.cc:47:30: fatal error: negation of -2147483648 cannot be r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56652
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-03-18 12:33:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Quick check with clang -fsanitize=undefined shows:
> > ...
> > numeric.cc:47:30: fatal error: negation of -214748
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-18 12:56:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> > Yes. I hope this variant should work better (regtesting now):
>
> It "works better", but still has regressions:
Yes, I already notice
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56635
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-18
13:02:01 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 18 13:01:49 2013
New Revision: 196781
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196781
Log:
PR tree-optimization/56635
* fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56653
Bug #: 56653
Summary: Warning when verifying checksums from MD5SUMS file in
tarballs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56654
Bug #: 56654
Summary: uninit warning behaves erratically
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
49 matches
Mail list logo
