[Bug fortran/56638] Linker uses a lot of memory in Fortran 77

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56638 --- Comment #2 from ncc1701zzz at gmail dot com 2013-03-17 09:11:03 UTC --- I think you are completely missing the point because 1) the example program I wrote is also F95, 2) static memory allocation is part of the language, and 3) it works

[Bug fortran/56638] Linker uses a lot of memory in Fortran 77

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56638 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2013-03-17 09:13:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > I think you are completely missing the point because 1) the example program I > wrote is also F95, 2) static memory allocation is part of the language

[Bug fortran/56638] Linker uses a lot of memory in Fortran 77

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56638 --- Comment #4 from ncc1701zzz at gmail dot com 2013-03-17 09:31:25 UTC --- Dear Andrew, Thanks for your answer. I didn't know that the linker was not part of GCC. I'll try to report it to the bugzilla you say. The truth is that I pers

[Bug middle-end/56417] internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56417 Antoine Balestrat changed: What|Removed |Added CC||antoine.balestrat at gmail

[Bug fortran/56637] Bad result on max(1,shiftr(j,1))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/55979] [C++11] std::list range construction imposes unnecessary conversion constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55979 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug libstdc++/55977] [C++11] vector range construction imposes unnecessary conversion constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55977 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug libstdc++/56468] Clang exposes bug with unexpected forward-declaration of type_info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56468 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-17 11:35:55 UTC --- Yeah, I think this patch is fine even for 4.8.0, and there is no need to do another RC for that.

[Bug fortran/56500] [OOP] "IMPLICIT CLASS(...)" wrongly rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug fortran/56500] [OOP] "IMPLICIT CLASS(...)" wrongly rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment

[Bug c++/56639] New: ice in cp_parser_late_return_type_opt

Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: dcb...@hotmail.com I just tried to compile the package kdesdk-4.10.1-1 on gcc-4.9 trunk dated 20130317 on an AMD x86_64 box. The compiler said BUILD/kdesdk-4.10.1/lokalize/src/project

[Bug libstdc++/56468] Clang exposes bug with unexpected forward-declaration of type_info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56468 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-17 14:10:46 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Sun Mar 17 14:10:39 2013 New Revision: 196749 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196749 Log: PR libstdc++/56468 * libsupc+

[Bug libstdc++/56468] Clang exposes bug with unexpected forward-declaration of type_info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56468 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/56592] [SH] Add vector ABI

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56592 --- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo 2013-03-17 14:19:55 UTC --- Regarding multi-word arguments: > 'double' values are passed in DR registers, where the high 32 bits are passed > in FR(n*2) and the low 32 bits in FR(n*2+1) regardless of the end

[Bug middle-end/56640] New: [4.8 Regression] bootstrap failure on arm-linux-gnueabi{,hf}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56640 Bug #: 56640 Summary: [4.8 Regression] bootstrap failure on arm-linux-gnueabi{,hf} Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIR

[Bug fortran/56637] Bad result on max(1,shiftr(j,1))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug middle-end/56640] [4.8 Regression] bootstrap failure on arm-linux-gnueabi{,hf}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56640 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code T

[Bug fortran/44735] ICE on FORALL with character array pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44735 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2010-07-01 06:21:38 |2013-03-17 15:00 Known to f

[Bug middle-end/56640] [4.8 Regression] bootstrap failure on arm-linux-gnueabi{,hf}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56640 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose 2013-03-17 15:24:52 UTC --- the Debian builds use glibc-2.13 and binutils 2.22.x., the Ubuntu build glibc-2.17 and binutils-2.23.x

[Bug fortran/47065] Replace trim(a) by a(1:len_trim(a))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47065 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/56637] Bad result on max(1,shiftr(j,1))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637 --- Comment #12 from Fred Krogh 2013-03-17 15:35:10 UTC --- For those using valgrind on gentoo for the first time (like me) you need to add to FEATURES in make.conf, "splitdebug" and re-emerge glibc. I've tried running valgrind on my pro

[Bug c++/56641] New: [4.7/4.8 regression] Bogus warning: 'A' has a field 'A::e' whose type uses the anonymous namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56641 Bug #: 56641 Summary: [4.7/4.8 regression] Bogus warning: 'A' has a field 'A::e' whose type uses the anonymous namespace Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unkno

[Bug fortran/56500] [OOP] "IMPLICIT CLASS(...)" wrongly rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-17 15:59:42 UTC --- The patches of comment 2 and comment 3 regtest cleanly.

[Bug target/56640] [4.8 Regression] bootstrap failure on arm-linux-gnueabi{,hf}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56640 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/56640] [4.8 Regression] bootstrap failure on arm-linux-gnueabi{,hf}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56640 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug target/56640] [4.8 Regression] bootstrap failure on arm-linux-gnueabi{,hf}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56640 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-17 16:28:27 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sun Mar 17 16:28:16 2013 New Revision: 196753 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196753 Log: PR target/56640 * config/arm/ar

[Bug target/56640] [4.8 Regression] bootstrap failure on arm-linux-gnueabi{,hf}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56640 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-17 16:29:07 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sun Mar 17 16:28:55 2013 New Revision: 196754 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196754 Log: PR target/56640 * config/arm/ar

[Bug fortran/56637] Bad result on max(1,shiftr(j,1))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637 --- Comment #13 from Fred Krogh 2013-03-17 16:40:22 UTC --- As perhaps you have already guessed, this is just me being confused. After removing a lot of stuff from the code, I inserted a print statement thus 620 k = max(1, shiftr(l

[Bug fortran/56637] Bad result on max(1,shiftr(j,1))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56637 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/55282] [OOP] openmp directive and classes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55282 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resol

[Bug fortran/52531] [OOP] Compilation fails with polymorphic dummy argument and OpenMP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52531 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||valeryweber at hotmail d

[Bug target/18566] Can vary constants (undefined fortran)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18566 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/52531] [OOP] Compilation fails with polymorphic dummy argument and OpenMP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52531 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed

[Bug tree-optimization/22041] Reverse loop order for increased efficiency

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22041 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2010-12-30 12:00:00 |2013-03-17 12:00 Known to f

[Bug c++/56642] New: ice in backtrace_dwarf_add

: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: dcb...@hotmail.com I just tried to compile the package qtwebkit-2.3-0.6.rc1.fc19 on gcc-4.9 trunk dated 20130317 on an AMD x86_64 box. The compiler said BUILD/webkit-qtwebkit-23/Source/WTF/wtf

[Bug c++/56642] ice in backtrace_dwarf_add

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56642 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman 2013-03-17 17:59:19 UTC --- Created attachment 29684 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29684 gzipped C++ source code

[Bug libstdc++/55979] [C++11] std::list range construction imposes unnecessary conversion constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55979 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-17 18:28:01 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sun Mar 17 18:27:52 2013 New Revision: 196755 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196755 Log: 2013-03-17 Paolo Carlini

[Bug c++/56641] [4.7/4.8 regression] Bogus warning: 'A' has a field 'A::e' whose type uses the anonymous namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56641 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/56641] [4.7/4.8 regression] Bogus warning: 'A' has a field 'A::e' whose type uses the anonymous namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56641 Paul Pluzhnikov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/56500] [OOP] "IMPLICIT CLASS(...)" wrongly rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-03-17 19:46:16 UTC --- > The patches of comment 2 and comment 3 regtest cleanly. With the patches applied to a clean revision 196754 I have lot of errors in my tests and at least one failure

[Bug fortran/56594] Invalid read of size 1 for gfortran.dg/realloc_on_assign_5.f03

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56594 Tilo Schwarz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||t...@tilo-schwarz.de --- Comment

[Bug c++/56643] New: Failure to match noexcept specifier of friend template function in template class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56643 Bug #: 56643 Summary: Failure to match noexcept specifier of friend template function in template class Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Stat

[Bug c++/56643] Failure to match noexcept specifier of friend template function in template class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56643 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/56642] ice in backtrace_dwarf_add

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56642 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 20:32:24 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 20:32:17 2013 New Revision: 196758 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196758 Log: PR c++/17232 PR c++/56642

[Bug c++/17232] classes and class template specializations treated differently w.r.t. core issue #337

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17232 --- Comment #19 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-17 20:32:24 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Mar 17 20:32:17 2013 New Revision: 196758 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196758 Log: PR c++/17232 PR c++/56642

[Bug c++/56639] ice in cp_parser_late_return_type_opt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56639 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/56500] [OOP] "IMPLICIT CLASS(...)" wrongly rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-17 21:01:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > > The patches of comment 2 and comment 3 regtest cleanly. > > With the patches applied to a clean revision 196754 I have lot of errors in m

[Bug c++/56639] ice in cp_parser_late_return_type_opt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56639 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman 2013-03-17 21:10:17 UTC --- Created attachment 29685 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29685 gzipped C++ source code

[Bug c++/56222] Pointer to member in lambda should not require this to be captured

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56222 Michael Bruck changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bruck.michael at googlemail

[Bug fortran/56500] [OOP] "IMPLICIT CLASS(...)" wrongly rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-03-17 21:30:32 UTC --- > Oops, you're right. *Lots* of failures. Seems I looked at the wrong logfile :( AFAICT they come from the patch in comment #2 and are mostly (all?) of the kind "... ha

[Bug bootstrap/56644] New: --disable-nls requires symbols from libintl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56644 Bug #: 56644 Summary: --disable-nls requires symbols from libintl Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/56645] New: libgcc /configure identifies non-existing /lib/cpp as preprocessor on Mingw

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56645 Bug #: 56645 Summary: libgcc /configure identifies non-existing /lib/cpp as preprocessor on Mingw Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 S

[Bug fortran/56500] [OOP] "IMPLICIT CLASS(...)" wrongly rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56500 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-17 22:37:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > > Oops, you're right. *Lots* of failures. Seems I looked at the wrong logfile > > :( > > AFAICT they come from the patch in comment #2 and

[Bug libgcc/56646] New: ICE: in cp_parser_late_return_type_opt, at cp/parser.c:16970

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56646 Bug #: 56646 Summary: ICE: in cp_parser_late_return_type_opt, at cp/parser.c:16970 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONF

[Bug c++/54359] [C++0x] decltype in member function's trailing return type when defined outside of class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54359 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-18 03:41:18 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Mar 18 03:41:10 2013 New Revision: 196765 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196765 Log: PR c++/54359 PR c++/56639

[Bug c++/56639] ice in cp_parser_late_return_type_opt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56639 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-18 03:41:19 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Mar 18 03:41:10 2013 New Revision: 196765 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196765 Log: PR c++/54359 PR c++/56639

[Bug c++/56222] Pointer to member in lambda should not require this to be captured

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56222 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-18 03:51:11 UTC --- Now that 4.8.0 is about to be released, I'm reluctant to backport non-regression C++11 fixes to 4.7.

[Bug c/56647] New: use return value of malloc() as initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56647 Bug #: 56647 Summary: use return value of malloc() as initializer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c/56647] use return value of malloc() as initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56647 --- Comment #2 from shia 2013-03-18 05:54:54 UTC --- I think maybe only this one is right: r.c:4:1: error: initializer element is not constant the other part may cause little confused.

[Bug c/56647] use return value of malloc() as initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56647 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2013-03-18 06:11:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > --- > r.c:4:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class [enabled by > default] > r.c:4:1: e

[Bug c/56647] use return value of malloc() as initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56647 shia changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|