[Bug target/56529] [SH] Calls to __sdivsi3_i4i and __udivsi3_i4i are generated on SH2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56529 --- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo 2013-03-04 23:44:09 UTC --- Created attachment 29581 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29581 A possible patch This patch seems to fix the problem, although tested only with 'make all-gcc'.

[Bug c/56527] Provide an import counterpart to attribute((visibility("protected")))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56527 --- Comment #1 from Andy Lutomirski 2013-03-05 00:37:20 UTC --- In fact, without an improvement like this, protected visibility is unusable on objects -- anything linking against a protected object will generate a copy relocation. The fac

[Bug target/56529] [SH] Calls to __sdivsi3_i4i and __udivsi3_i4i are generated on SH2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56529 Kazumoto Kojima changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug libstdc++/37522] [4.4 regression] Incorrect vswprintf prototype breaks __to_xstring

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37522 Karlson2k changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k2k at narod dot ru --- Comment #16

[Bug libstdc++/37522] [4.4 regression] Incorrect vswprintf prototype breaks __to_xstring

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37522 --- Comment #17 from Karlson2k 2013-03-05 01:28:06 UTC --- Created attachment 29582 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29582 Proposed patch Possible patch for latest MinGW-w64. Patched GCC version: 4.7.2 Can be easy ed

[Bug c++/56480] Explicit specialization in a namespace enclosing the specialized template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56480 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/55295] [SH] Add support for fipr instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55295 --- Comment #4 from Manu Evans 2013-03-05 01:55:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > +1 > > > > I'm seeing the same pattern. > > Infact, I'm noticing a lot of my maths code seems to be performing a lot of

[Bug c++/56480] Explicit specialization in a namespace enclosing the specialized template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56480 --- Comment #2 from Nathan Ridge 2013-03-05 04:30:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I think this is > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#374 Ah, I see. The code is accepted if a declaration (without definit

[Bug c++/56530] New: Bogus warning with -Wsign-conversion (again)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56530 Bug #: 56530 Summary: Bogus warning with -Wsign-conversion (again) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Prior

[Bug bootstrap/56509] [4.8 regression] gnattools build failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56509 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-05 06:01:24 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 5 06:01:13 2013 New Revision: 196449 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196449 Log: PR bootstrap/56509 * opts.c (op

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 --- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-05 06:02:46 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 5 06:02:36 2013 New Revision: 196450 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196450 Log: PR middle-end/56461 * sel-sche

[Bug rtl-optimization/56494] [4.8 Regression] ICE in simplify_truncation, at simplify-rtx.c:619

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56494 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-05 06:04:23 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 5 06:04:14 2013 New Revision: 196451 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196451 Log: PR rtl-optimization/56494 * sim

[Bug bootstrap/56509] [4.8 regression] gnattools build failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56509 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/56494] [4.8 Regression] ICE in simplify_truncation, at simplify-rtx.c:619

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56494 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/56451] [4.8 regression] Wrong code for gcc.c-torture/execute/941015-1.c on SH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56451 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug target/56470] [4.8 Regression] ICE output_operand: invalid shift operand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56470 --- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw 2013-03-05 07:01:42 UTC --- Definitely a back-end bug. I'm not disputing that. My surprise is that this hasn't bitten us long before now, since the code has been this way for well over ten years.

[Bug target/56441] [ARM Thumb] generated asm code produces "branch out of range" error in gas with -O1 -mcpu=cortex-m3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56441 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

<    1   2