[Bug tree-optimization/56478] [4.8 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception in tree_estimate_probability

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56478 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dehao at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug tree-optimization/56478] [4.8 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception in tree_estimate_probability

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56478 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-28 08:15:19 UTC --- There are other issues, like e.g. using int type to store step, with: if (host_integerp (iv0.step, 0)) step = tree_low_cst (iv0.step, 0); guard for that. host_in

[Bug c++/56480] New: Explicit specialization in a namespace enclosing the specialized template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56480 Bug #: 56480 Summary: Explicit specialization in a namespace enclosing the specialized template Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Sta

[Bug libstdc++/56475] Incorrect result of configure test for /dev/random (_GLIBCXX_USE_RANDOM_TR1) for MinGW platform (and others?)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56475 --- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz 2013-02-28 08:43:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > I agree. Care to send a patch for that? Well, something like this should fix the issue: Index: acinclude.m4

[Bug target/56445] avr.c:11551:16: error: invoking macro FX_FTYPE_FX ar gument 1: empty macro arguments are undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56445 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2013-02-28 09:16:15 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Thu Feb 28 09:16:08 2013 New Revision: 196332 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196332 Log: PR target/56445 * config/avr/a

[Bug target/56445] avr.c:11551:16: error: invoking macro FX_FTYPE_FX ar gument 1: empty macro arguments are undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56445 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/54640] arm_adjust_block_mem: signed/unsigned comparison

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54640 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2013-02-25 00:00:00 |2013-02-27 0:00 --- Co

[Bug libstdc++/56475] Incorrect result of configure test for /dev/random (_GLIBCXX_USE_RANDOM_TR1) for MinGW platform (and others?)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56475 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-28 09:45:50 UTC --- Good. I would say, please add a one line comment mentioning the MSYS subsystem issue, etc, test and commit at your ease. Thanks!

[Bug target/48901] lm32.md: ashlsi3: error: unused variable ‘one’

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48901 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug target/54662] Wrong warning flags for building mep-pragma.o, fails to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54662 --- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2013-02-28 09:49:36 UTC --- mep-elf builds OK now.

[Bug c++/55813] Poorly named/documented option Wctor-dtor-privacy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55813 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-28 10:01:04 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Feb 28 10:00:54 2013 New Revision: 196334 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196334 Log: 2013-02-28 Paolo Carlini

[Bug other/49401] Warning regression for 'uninitialized' variable on non-existant code path (in mep-pragma.c)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49401 --- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2013-02-28 10:01:16 UTC --- mep-elf builds OK now. However, this is also a diagnostics issue, that has to be checked with the preprocessed source from the attachment. gcc (GCC) 4.8.0 20130225 on i686-pc

[Bug c++/55813] Poorly named/documented option Wctor-dtor-privacy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55813 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/52500] dwarf2cfi.c fails to build with -Werror for c6x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52500 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug target/52550] tile*.c: unused variable ‘cfa_offset’

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52550 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug target/54639] mn10300_expand_epilogue: signed / unsigned comparison

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54639 --- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2013-02-28 10:09:45 UTC --- am33_2.0-linux / mn10300-elf build OK now.

[Bug target/52501] cr16-protos.h uses enum rtx_code outside #ifdef RTX_CODE guard

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52501 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug target/54639] mn10300_expand_epilogue: signed / unsigned comparison

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54639 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug rtl-optimization/56466] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1629 (loop with header n not in loop tree !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56466 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek 2013-02-28 10:13:53 UTC --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Feb 28 10:13:48 2013 New Revision: 196335 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196335 Log: PR rtl-optimization/56466

[Bug rtl-optimization/56466] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1629 (loop with header n not in loop tree !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56466 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/54662] Wrong warning flags for building mep-pragma.o, fails to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54662 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolu

[Bug c++/56481] New: [4.8 Regression] endless loop compiling a C++ file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56481 Bug #: 56481 Summary: [4.8 Regression] endless loop compiling a C++ file Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/56474] [4.8 regression] bogus Storage_Error raised for record containing empty zero-based array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/56474] [4.8 regression] bogus Storage_Error raised for record containing empty zero-based array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC|ebotcazou at gcc dot| |gnu.org

[Bug sanitizer/55309] gcc's address-sanitizer 66% slower than clang's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55309 --- Comment #57 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-02-28 11:31:54 UTC --- I've created a page that describes how I run SPEC with asan. There is also a patch that works around the known SPEC bugs. https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wik

[Bug c++/56481] [4.8 Regression] endless loop compiling a C++ file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56481 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgcc/56482] New: missing -lpthread in configure when checking for pthreads_num_processors_np

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56482 Bug #: 56482 Summary: missing -lpthread in configure when checking for pthreads_num_processors_np Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 S

[Bug sanitizer/56454] need to rename attribute no_address_safety_analysis to no_sanitize_address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56454 --- Comment #11 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-02-28 12:01:34 UTC --- Created attachment 29550 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29550 rename no_address_safety_analysis to no_sanitize_address How do we decide? When is the

[Bug sanitizer/56454] need to rename attribute no_address_safety_analysis to no_sanitize_address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56454 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-28 12:13:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > Created attachment 29550 [details] > rename no_address_safety_analysis to no_sanitize_address > > How do we decide? When is the deadline for 4.8?

[Bug libstdc++/56482] missing -lpthread in configure when checking for pthreads_num_processors_np

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56482 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/56454] need to rename attribute no_address_safety_analysis to no_sanitize_address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56454 --- Comment #13 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-02-28 12:36:12 UTC --- > This doesn't DTRT with the old attribute, because you lookup_attribute only > the > new name. > Either you'd need to look up also the old name, or > handle_no_address_s

[Bug tree-optimization/56294] BOOT_CFLAGS='-O2 -g -fno-ipa-sra' leads to bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294 --- Comment #12 from Martin Jambor 2013-02-28 12:43:42 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Thu Feb 28 12:43:33 2013 New Revision: 196340 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196340 Log: 2013-02-28 Martin Jambor PR

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.5/4.7/4.8/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/56478] [4.8 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception in tree_estimate_probability

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56478 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug libstdc++/56482] missing -lpthread in configure when checking for pthreads_num_processors_np

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56482 --- Comment #2 from Karlson2k 2013-02-28 14:08:02 UTC --- If it'll be only compile test, how result can be linked when dependence on libpthread will be unknown?

[Bug libstdc++/56482] missing -lpthread in configure when checking for pthreads_num_processors_np

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56482 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-28 14:27:48 UTC --- The function is only used in src/c++11/thread.cc which will already be linked to libpthread.so if needed.

[Bug libstdc++/56482] missing -lpthread in configure when checking for pthreads_num_processors_np

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56482 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-28 14:29:10 UTC --- Actually that might not be true ... the other functions used in thread.cc could be linked to weak symbols.

[Bug lto/56483] New: LTO issue with expanding GIMPLE_COND

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56483 Bug #: 56483 Summary: LTO issue with expanding GIMPLE_COND Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug lto/56483] LTO issue with expanding GIMPLE_COND

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56483 --- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev 2013-02-28 14:43:22 UTC --- Created attachment 29551 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29551 test-case to reproduce Test must be compiled with -O2 -flto -fno-inline options

[Bug target/56484] New: ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1268

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56484 Bug #: 56484 Summary: ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1268 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug target/56484] ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1268

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56484 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/56485] New: internal compiler error: in cdtor_comdat_group, at cp/optimize.c:\ 186

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56485 Bug #: 56485 Summary: internal compiler error: in cdtor_comdat_group, at cp/optimize.c:\ 186 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status

[Bug c++/56485] internal compiler error: in cdtor_comdat_group, at cp/optimize.c:\ 186

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56485 --- Comment #1 from Guy Blelloch 2013-02-28 15:45:16 UTC --- Created attachment 29553 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29553 Full output of the compile

[Bug c++/56485] internal compiler error: in cdtor_comdat_group, at cp/optimize.c:\ 186

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56485 --- Comment #2 from Guy Blelloch 2013-02-28 15:46:04 UTC --- Created attachment 29554 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29554 The .ii file

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.5/4.7/4.8/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 --- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-02-28 15:49:34 UTC --- Created attachment 29555 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29555 proof of concept: untested

[Bug c/56465] Strange warning about variable modified range

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56465 --- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz 2013-02-28 15:56:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > >it is actual a constant. > > I don't think it is a integer constant expression though as it contains a cast > from a pointer type to an integer type.

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dnovillo at gcc dot

[Bug c++/56243] [4.8 regression] ICE in tree check: expected field_decl, have identifier_node in fixed_type_or_null, at cp/class.c:6645

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56243 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-28 16:01:28 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Feb 28 16:01:09 2013 New Revision: 196343 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196343 Log: PR c++/56243 * call.c (build_ov

[Bug libstdc++/56468] Clang exposes bug with unexpected forward-declaration of type_info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56468 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Frey 2013-02-28 16:14:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) I think the first line you added is enough, as evidenced by my "fix" referenced in the Stack Overflow discussion (see link above). But the second line w

[Bug target/56484] ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1268

=/work/builds/gcc-fsf-master/tools --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --with-ppl-include=/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu Thread model: posix gcc version 4.8.0 20130228 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug tree-optimization/55796] Comparison with a negated number vs sum

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55796 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2013-02-28 16:57:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > DOM is the optimization that tries to optimize these cases. It's probably > overly careful for FP compares. Note that the compiler doesn't optimize

[Bug c++/56481] [4.8 Regression] endless loop compiling a C++ file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56481 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug c/56465] Strange warning about variable modified range

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56465 Chung-Ju Wu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jasonwucj at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug c++/56481] [4.8 Regression] endless loop compiling a C++ file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56481 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-28 17:35:47 UTC --- With -std=c++11 this actually started already with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189851 when that code has been introduced in potential_constant_expression_1.

[Bug c/55830] inline and __attribute__((always_inline)) treated differently for unused-function warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55830 Chris King changed: What|Removed |Added CC||colanderman at gmail dot

[Bug c++/56312] Firefox 20.0a1 compilation with enabled LTO fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56312 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška 2013-02-28 18:31:05 UTC --- I patched following two files with __attribute__ ((used)) which helped to go further, having a new issue: /home/marxin/Programming/firefox/xpcom/components/nsComponentManager.cpp: In

[Bug target/16458] PowerPC - redundant compare

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16458 --- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner 2013-02-28 20:21:05 UTC --- Author: bergner Date: Thu Feb 28 20:20:56 2013 New Revision: 196357 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196357 Log: gcc/ Backport from mainline

[Bug c++/56481] [4.8 Regression] endless loop compiling a C++ file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56481 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-28 20:21:36 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Feb 28 20:21:23 2013 New Revision: 196358 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196358 Log: PR c++/56481 * semantics.c (pot

[Bug c++/56243] [4.8 regression] ICE in tree check: expected field_decl, have identifier_node in fixed_type_or_null, at cp/class.c:6645

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56243 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56481] [4.8 Regression] endless loop compiling a C++ file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56481 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-28 20:36:54 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Feb 28 20:36:47 2013 New Revision: 196359 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196359 Log: PR c++/56481 * g++.dg/cpp0x/con

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug c++/56481] [4.8 Regression] endless loop compiling a C++ file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56481 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-28 21:20:34 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Feb 28 21:20:26 2013 New Revision: 196360 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196360 Log: PR middle-end/56461 * tree-vec

[Bug sanitizer/56454] need to rename attribute no_address_safety_analysis to no_sanitize_address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56454 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-28 21:23:30 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Feb 28 21:23:23 2013 New Revision: 196361 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196361 Log: PR sanitizer/56454 * asan.c (g

[Bug tree-optimization/56486] New: infinite loop in cc1 at -O1 and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56486 Bug #: 56486 Summary: infinite loop in cc1 at -O1 and above Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug tree-optimization/56486] infinite loop in cc1 at -O1 and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56486 --- Comment #1 from Dara Hazeghi 2013-02-28 22:37:44 UTC --- Created attachment 29556 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29556 hanging testcase

[Bug c++/55135] Segfault of gcc on a big file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|2012-10

[Bug c++/55135] Segfault of gcc on a big file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135 --- Comment #10 from Steven Bosscher 2013-02-28 23:58:38 UTC --- Created attachment 29557 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29557 Collected hacks to make the test case compile in reasonable time with -O0 Patch does 2 t

[Bug c++/55135] [4.8 Regression] Segfault of gcc on a big file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog,

[Bug target/56487] New: SSE2 code crashes when compiled at -O0 -m32 -msse2

optimization enabled, or with gcc 3.x, it executes successfully. Host/target is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. $ gcc-trunk --version gcc-trunk (GCC) 4.8.0 20130228 (experimental) [trunk revision 196339] $ gcc-trunk -m32 -msse2 -O1 sse-isamax.c $ ./a.out $ gcc-trunk -m32 -msse2 -O0 sse-isamax.c

[Bug target/56487] SSE2 code crashes when compiled at -O0 -m32 -msse2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56487 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/56428] [C++11] "is not a constant expression" when comparing non-type template argument to nullptr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56428 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/56488] New: wrong code for loop at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56488 Bug #: 56488 Summary: wrong code for loop at -O3 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/56489] New: [C++11] Member type lookup fails on dependent using-declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56489 Bug #: 56489 Summary: [C++11] Member type lookup fails on dependent using-declarations Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/56488] wrong code for loop at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56488 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2013-03-01 06:58:48 UTC --- Works on the trunk.

[Bug target/56484] ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1268

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56484 Venkataramanan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||venkataramanan.kumar at amd

[Bug c++/55135] [4.8 Regression] Segfault of gcc on a big file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135 --- Comment #12 from Steven Bosscher 2013-03-01 07:50:43 UTC --- Last night's compilation at -O1 with my hacks applied finished after a whopping >6 hours. Top compile time consumers: early inlining heuristics: 12409.92 (55%) usr integ

[Bug c++/55135] [4.8 Regression] Segfault of gcc on a big file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135 --- Comment #13 from Steven Bosscher 2013-03-01 07:52:41 UTC --- For reference, my numbers are for GCC 4.8 trunk r196182, configured with release checking, on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, on AMD Opteron Processor 8354 at 2200MHz.