http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #19 from Dominique d'Humieres
2013-02-12 17:51:13 UTC ---
This breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin10:
...
test -f stamp-libada || \
make -C ../.././gcc/ada "MAKEOVERRIDES=" "LDFLAGS=" "LN_S=ln -s"
"SHELL=/bin/sh"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56285
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #20 from Kai Tietz 2013-02-12 18:02:56
UTC ---
Hmm,
why is NS_RECURSIVE for you an empty? It should become either cp -pR, or be
equal to content of LN_S.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #21 from Kai Tietz 2013-02-12 18:04:53
UTC ---
"LN_S_RECURSIVE" I mean.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #22 from Dominique d'Humieres
2013-02-12 18:07:16 UTC ---
> why is NS_RECURSIVE for you an empty? It should become either cp -pR, or be
> equal to content of LN_S.
No idea. For a successfull bootstrap I see
..
rm -rf ada
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #23 from Karlson2k 2013-02-12 18:11:09 UTC ---
Try to use LN_S_RECURSIVE:= instead of LN_S_RECURSIVE=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148
--- Comment #10 from Steven Bosscher 2013-02-12
18:12:00 UTC ---
Vlad, could you please explain a bit how you figured out this issue
so quickly? (I mean, apart from experience, of course.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56246
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
--- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner 2013-02-12
18:13:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 29426
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29426
Assembly file of slp-perm-1.c after lto with -mcpu=power6 -O3 -maltivec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor 2013-02-12
18:16:27 UTC ---
Yes, compiling the pre-processed source with -c -O2 -fno-ipa-sra
-fcompare-debug -fno-exceptions fails too. Time for some debug
counters.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
--- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner 2013-02-12
18:16:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 29427
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29427
slp-perm-1.c assembly file before LTO is run with -mcpu=power6 -O3 -maltivec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56296
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres
2013-02-12 18:21:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Please also split the testcase - it contains
> several tests and only one has invalid overflow.
Actually there are three of them
(a)
p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |lto
--- Comment #7 from Mich
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54730
--- Comment #10 from Mikael Morin 2013-02-12
18:33:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 29428
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29428
Fairly complete (untested) fix
This patch implements a partial undo framework, in other wor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148
--- Comment #11 from Sérgio Basto 2013-02-12
18:38:06 UTC ---
Vlad, don't wanna rush you , but let me know when we have this patch on gcc of
Fedora rawhide , to continue testing compilation of VirtualBox .
Thanks,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-12
18:41:37 UTC ---
Can you please try the following?
echo > Makefile <<\EOF
LN_S=cp -p
ifeq (cp -p,$(LN_S))
LN_S_RECURSIVE=cp -pr
else
LN_S_RECURSIVE=$(LN_S)
endif
all:
echo $(LN_S_REC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56148
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
--- Comment #9 from Michael Meissner 2013-02-12
19:07:18 UTC ---
The -fsection-anchors option appears to be important. If I use
-fsection-anchors (which is default for powerpc64-linux), LTO does not align
the .rodata section, but uses Alt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #25 from Dominique d'Humieres
2013-02-12 19:14:45 UTC ---
> Can you please try the following?
> ...
> Works for me just fine. Perhaps you have buggy make?
Is this working?
[macbook] f90/bug% cat Makefile
LN_S=cp -p
ife
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44938
Matt Hargett changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at use dot net
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
--- Comment #10 from Michael Meissner 2013-02-12
19:16:56 UTC ---
If -fno-merge-constants (and the default -fsection-anchors) is used, then the
correct alignment for the table is set (and Altivec memory instructions are
used).
At a gues
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44938
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51544
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56204
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor 2013-02-12
19:43:39 UTC ---
Yes, compiling the pre-processed source with -c -O2 -fno-ipa-sra
-fcompare-debug -fno-exceptions fails too. Time for some debug
counters.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-12
19:49:34 UTC ---
Yes. Then I have no idea why it doesn't work for you during bootstrap.
Stick some echo ln_s $(LN_S) ln_s_recursive $(LN_S_RECURSIVE) into the targets
that use $(LN_S_RECURSIVE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44938
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44938
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek 2013-02-12
20:07:30 UTC ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Feb 12 20:07:04 2013
New Revision: 195989
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195989
Log:
Fix bootstrap with -O3.
Modified:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44938
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334
--- Comment #24 from Martin Jambor 2013-02-12
20:10:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 29429
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29429
Experimental patch resolving more dependencies
This is my (untested, highly experimental)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #27 from Dominique d'Humieres
2013-02-12 20:16:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Try to use LN_S_RECURSIVE:= instead of LN_S_RECURSIVE=
As in
--- ../_clean/libada/Makefile.in2013-02-12 16:45:25.0 +0100
++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56285
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-12
20:47:23 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 12 20:47:15 2013
New Revision: 195990
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195990
Log:
PR c++/56285
* method.c (add_on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111
--- Comment #17 from Marc Glisse 2013-02-12
20:55:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Marc, any news on this?
I landed less than 2 hours ago...
I'll see if I can handle it tomorrow.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56181
Jan-Benedict Glaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de
--- Comment #15 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56300
Bug #: 56300
Summary: Add __sync_fetch_and_add_8 and other 8-byte atomic
functions to 32-bit MIPS targets
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56300
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56300
--- Comment #2 from chaoyingfu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-12 22:21:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Use libatomic in 4.8 to fix this.
Good to know this. Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski 2013-02-12
23:50:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> ../../../gcc-trunk/libgcc/crtstuff.c: In function 'frame_dummy':
> ../../../gcc-trunk/libgcc/crtstuff.c:463:19: warning: array subscript is above
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56301
Bug #: 56301
Summary: [4.7 Regression] wrong code with the fix for PR53844
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56242
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
--- Comment #3 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55496
Matt Hargett changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at use dot net
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56135
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56285
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55805
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54126
--- Comment #4 from Freddie Chopin 2013-02-13
07:29:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 29430
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29430
simple fail case
I think I have an even simplier test case, I guess it's the same problem
101 - 148 of 148 matches
Mail list logo