http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56178
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
--- Comment #33 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-04
10:44:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 29347
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29347
gcc48-pr54314.patch
Ah, I see, solaris and mingw/cygwin have their own assemble_visibility
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55970
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56188
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-02-04
11:58:50 UTC ---
ok, the difference is that in the working case we have
Equivalence classes for Direct node node id 28:_10 are pointer: 11, location:0
Equivalence classes for Direct node node
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56151
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55890
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener 2013-02-04
12:04:41 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 4 12:04:35 2013
New Revision: 195708
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195708
Log:
2013-02-04 Richard Biener
B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53844
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener 2013-02-04
12:04:42 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 4 12:04:35 2013
New Revision: 195708
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195708
Log:
2013-02-04 Richard Biener
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55660
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener 2013-02-04
12:04:43 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 4 12:04:35 2013
New Revision: 195708
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195708
Log:
2013-02-04 Richard Biener
B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53844
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55660
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55890
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener 2013-02-04
12:08:17 UTC ---
Initial patch now backported, avoiding the C++ function overloading by
using gimple_call_builtin_class_p.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56201
Bug #: 56201
Summary: Realloc on assignment: Wrong code when assigning a
zero-sized array
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56168
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-02-04
12:19:34 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 4 12:19:25 2013
New Revision: 195709
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195709
Log:
2013-02-04 Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56168
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56172
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-02-04 13:00:59 UTC ---
Thanks for the analysis.
> Since you can recreate the bug, I guess the next step is to check the
> mp->waitsema field in the runtime_semawakeup frame. My
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202
Bug #: 56202
Summary: SIGFPE (division by zero) in
std::binomial_distribution
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56131
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sparc-linux |sparc-*-*
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55978
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56203
Bug #: 56203
Summary: gfortran.dg/minlocval_3.f90 times out on Solaris/SPARC
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56188
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener 2013-02-04
13:31:35 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 4 13:31:28 2013
New Revision: 195713
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195713
Log:
2013-02-04 Richard Biener
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56204
Bug #: 56204
Summary: [4.8 regression] gfortran.dg/quad_[23].f90 FAIL on
Solaris 9/x86
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56188
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56186
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55978
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56202
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38134
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener 2013-02-04
14:47:31 UTC ---
Ok, the goal would be to have all !targetm.legitimate_constant_p () constants
assigned to a pseudo (and in GIMPLE to an SSA name). One piece of code that
defeats that purpose
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56199
--- Comment #3 from Ondrej Bilka 2013-02-04 15:15:12
UTC ---
Created attachment 29349
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29349
icatche stressing benchmark
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56131
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56199
Ondrej Bilka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|IN
101 - 129 of 129 matches
Mail list logo