[Bug fortran/42769] [OOP] ICE in resolve_typebound_procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42769 --- Comment #38 from Mikael Morin 2013-01-08 20:02:00 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Tue Jan 8 20:01:49 2013 New Revision: 195032 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195032 Log: PR fortran/42769 PR fortran/45

[Bug tree-optimization/55823] [4.8 Regression] ice in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:270

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55823 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-08 20:23:12 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Tue Jan 8 20:23:05 2013 New Revision: 195033 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195033 Log: PR tree-optimization/55823 *

[Bug c++/55879] [C++11] nested constexpr Initialisation raises internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55879 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler 2013-01-08 20:26:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > If I understand you right, then you mean that the s_Memmap is not an > "constexpr" array. As far as I understand this is not an issue that schould > preven

[Bug bootstrap/55790] Build Failure on Head Targeting x86_64 Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55790 Joel Sherrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/55908] [4.8 Regression] Problem binding a const member function to a const object

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55908 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-08 21:01:23 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Tue Jan 8 21:01:14 2013 New Revision: 195035 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195035 Log: PR libstdc++/55908 * include/s

[Bug c++/55908] [4.8 Regression] Problem binding a const member function to a const object

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55908 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/54286] [4.8 Regression] Accepts invalid proc-pointer assignments involving proc-ptr function result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54286 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/55882] unaligned load/store : incorrect struct offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55882 --- Comment #9 from Jan Smets 2013-01-08 21:45:23 UTC --- Patch verified.

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc*-*-*|powerpc-ibm-aix* --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/55760] scalar code non using rsqrtss and rcpss

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55760 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug bootstrap/55792] [4.8 Regression] Bad memory access with profiledbootstrap and LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792 --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-09 00:22:18 UTC --- gimple_location is duplicated by: #1 0x00751f32 in gimple_copy (stmt=0x7fffe8d75a00) at /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/gimple.c:2205 #2 0x009c960d in gimple_

[Bug libstdc++/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||sparc64-redhat-linux --- Commen

[Bug libstdc++/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/53218] [4.7 regression] cmake segfaults on sparcv9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53218 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||philip.copeland at oracle

[Bug libstdc++/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 philip.copeland at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|WAITING

[Bug libstdc++/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot

[Bug libstdc++/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #9 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-09 02:32:26 UTC --- Ooo. GCC C++ testsuite,... umm well a quick summary is this,.. it's horrible. === g++ Summary === # of expected passes

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #4 from David Edelsohn 2013-01-09 02:52:51 UTC --- Selective scheduling is failing for one of the new AIX TLS instructions when encountered for that testcase. The necessary options are: -O -fschedule-insns -fselective-schedul

[Bug libstdc++/55911] New: Segfault in unordered_map with max_load_factor > 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55911 Bug #: 55911 Summary: Segfault in unordered_map with max_load_factor > 1 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug c++/55893] [4.7/4.8 Regression][C++11] runtime segfault with static const object with virtual destructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55893 --- Comment #6 from Frank Heckenbach 2013-01-09 04:15:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Caused by http://gcc.gnu.org/PR49673 I believe. Perhaps instead of testing > whether TYPE_NEEDS_CONSTRUCTING we need to check if the type has non-

[Bug driver/55884] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884 --- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-01-09 04:16:22 UTC --- On 8-Jan-13, at 10:29 AM, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote: >> Can you attach libgomp.log ? > Have to do another build... This time I ran the full libgomp te

[Bug driver/55884] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884 --- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-01-09 04:46:36 UTC --- On 8-Jan-13, at 11:15 PM, John David Anglin wrote: > I'm thinking the -fintrinsic-modules-path option needs and '=' and > that the tls_runtime check fails when I j

[Bug tree-optimization/51680] g++ 4.7 fails to inline trivial template stuff

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51680 --- Comment #18 from miles at gnu dot org 2013-01-09 05:35:35 UTC --- Is this considered fixed yet? Given the following example, the latest Debian trunk snapshot ("4.8.0 20121120 (experimental) [trunk revision 193662]", using flags "-O2") s

[Bug c++/55436] g++ compiles invalid code with child class of nested class in template class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55436 --- Comment #8 from Conrad 2013-01-09 06:03:07 UTC --- Can we change this bug status to _confirmed_, and the target milestone to 4.8.0 ?

[Bug libstdc++/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #10 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-09 06:09:54 UTC --- Created attachment 29116 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29116 the gcc 4.7.2-8 srpm mangles the environment a bit but these are the tests

[Bug libstdc++/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-09 06:25:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > I suspect this may be an endian/alignment bug as the same g++ program will run > correctly on an x86_64 system, however my c++ foo is somewhat weak w

[Bug target/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #12 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-09 06:27:32 UTC --- Created attachment 29117 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29117 g++.log.tar.bz2 (part1) === g++ Summary for unix/ ===

[Bug target/55909] libtool test exposes what I think is some alignment issue in libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909 --- Comment #13 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-09 06:28:26 UTC --- Created attachment 29118 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29118 g++.log (part 2)

[Bug tree-optimization/55912] New: missing optimization of x/x and x/std::abs(x)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55912 Bug #: 55912 Summary: missing optimization of x/x and x/std::abs(x) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

<    1   2