http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55892
sworddragon2 at aol dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52343
--- Comment #5 from Dodji Seketeli 2013-01-07
08:03:39 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Mon Jan 7 08:03:33 2013
New Revision: 194960
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194960
Log:
PR c++/52343 - error with alias templat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55311
--- Comment #4 from Dodji Seketeli 2013-01-07
08:06:52 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Mon Jan 7 08:06:46 2013
New Revision: 194961
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194961
Log:
PR c++/55311 - Cannot specialize alias template w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763
--- Comment #22 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-07
08:36:24 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Jan 7 08:36:16 2013
New Revision: 194962
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194962
Log:
2012-01-07 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54992
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54990
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53876
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55891
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55893
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55890
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55890
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener 2013-01-07
10:03:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 29094
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29094
prototype patch
For example fixed with something like the following.
Of course it's alw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55888
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55883
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55236
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xi.wang at gmail dot com
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55881
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55882
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener 2013-01-07
10:12:53 UTC ---
It's a global, why should it get collected?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55878
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=864
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener 2013-01-07
10:14:54 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 7 10:14:48 2013
New Revision: 194964
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194964
Log:
2013-01-04 Richard Biener
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=864
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53900
--- Comment #7 from Christoph Hertzberg
2013-01-07 10:19:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> > __attribute__((aligned(16))) float array[4];
>
> Explicitly says the array is aligned to 16 bytes which means it is undefined
> by
> the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55876
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07 10:20:52 UTC ---
> Another way to go about it is to prevent the assert from triggering:
Tested and submitted fix:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-01/msg00288.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53900
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-07
10:21:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > > __attribute__((aligned(16))) float array[4];
> >
> > Explicitly says the array is aligned to 16 bytes which means i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55872
--- Comment #4 from Yogesh Gaur 2013-01-07
10:31:19 UTC ---
Hello,
Actually issue is combination of copy_relocation plus RTLD_DEEPBIND flag.
If I didn't give -fPIE flag while compiling my executable and pass
RTLD_DEEPBIND flag while o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52343
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55888
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-01-07
10:45:37 UTC ---
(gdb) call debug_bitmap_set (set)
debug[0] := { message_7(D) (0007), rv_26 (0024), _30 (0034), {plus_expr,i_62,1}
(0021), vntemp_50 (0044), {convert_expr,vntemp_50} (0069) }
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55311
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55852
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2013-01-07
11:11:01 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Jan 7 11:10:53 2013
New Revision: 194966
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194966
Log:
2013-01-07 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55890
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2013-01-07
11:21:44 UTC ---
Other testcase:
extern void *memmove();
main() { memmove(); }
also fails with GCC 4.6, 4.5 but not 4.4 or older.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55891
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-01-07
11:49:53 UTC ---
I see this behavior with gcc 4.8 on x86_64-apple-darwin10. It happens even if
the -fPIC options are removed (isn't it the default on darwin?). I recover the
expected beha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54218
--- Comment #5 from George Thomas 2013-01-07
12:04:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 29095
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29095
Draft Patch for the fix of 54218
The issue is happening because stack space is allocated tw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54218
George Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||george.thomas at atmel dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55890
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-01-07
12:07:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 29096
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29096
alternative patch
This verifies call arguments in gimple_call_builtin_p and adds a new ove
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-01-07 12:08:27 UTC ---
I can now confirm that using g++ 4.7 as bootstrap compiler works out of
the box. Even with the problems I've observed with g++ 4.4, this seems
a suitable w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-07
12:55:39 UTC ---
But that is not a requirement. The requirement is using a C++ compiler that
works out of the box (compiler configured in a path where its shared libraries
aren't found by the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283
--- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-01-07 13:06:16 UTC ---
> --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-07
> 12:55:39 UTC ---
> But that is not a requirement. The requirement is using a C++ compiler that
> works
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243
--- Comment #31 from Georg-Johann Lay 2013-01-07
13:12:18 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jan 7 13:12:10 2013
New Revision: 194970
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194970
Log:
Backport from 2013-01-07 trunk r19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55894
Bug #: 55894
Summary: No constant propagation in Intel intrinsics
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55895
Bug #: 55895
Summary: multiple type-bound procedures
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54524
Jan Smets changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55894
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55875
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-07
13:36:58 UTC ---
OK, the problem seems to be already in what simple_iv returns for SSA name 12.
Here we should have -1. While analyzing the cast
(gdb) p debug_gimple_stmt (at_stmt)
_12 = (long
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55894
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2013-01-07 13:48:17
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Usually target built-in folders are missing (targetm.fold_builtin).
That's one possibility. But I was wondering (and almost filed it in
rtl-optimizat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55896
Bug #: 55896
Summary: Annoying compiler warning
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55862
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener 2013-01-07
13:50:03 UTC ---
Followup, because of PR55888. We have
:
# c_21 = PHI
# p_41 = PHI
a.1_42 = a;
goto ;
:
# c_57 = PHI
# a.1_63 = PHI
# p_65 = PHI
*c_57 = 0;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55895
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55868
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Targ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55888
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener 2013-01-07
14:06:32 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 7 14:06:26 2013
New Revision: 194971
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194971
Log:
2013-01-07 Richard Biener
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55862
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener 2013-01-07
14:06:32 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 7 14:06:26 2013
New Revision: 194971
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194971
Log:
2013-01-07 Richard Biener
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55875
--- Comment #4 from rakdver at iuuk dot mff.cuni.cz 2013-01-07 14:09:18 UTC ---
> this is correct, since it is done in unsigned int.
> Next we do:
> res = chrec_convert (type, chrec1, at_stmt);
> Eventually we go to convert_affine_sce
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55888
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55875
--- Comment #5 from Zdenek Dvorak 2013-01-07
14:11:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> the check of scev_probably_wraps_p below should return false
this should be "should return true"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55897
Bug #: 55897
Summary: [avr] Allocate __memx data to .progmemx.data
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55894
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55525
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-07
14:51:26 UTC ---
I don't see any differences in assembly, when I compile either version of
random.i with -std=gnu99 -fcx-fortran-rules -g -O2 with a r189365 vs. r189366
x86_64-linux -> hppa2.0w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55525
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de
2013-01-07 14:55:31 UTC ---
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013, ro at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55525
>
> Rainer Orth changed:
>
>What|Remo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55898
Bug #: 55898
Summary: Can't obtain stack trace
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55899
Bug #: 55899
Summary: GCC should provide built-ins in data types
flavor/version/variation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43961
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54940
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55852
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slayoo at staszic dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55493
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55627
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55686
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55885
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2013-01-07 15:34:34 UTC ---
INT_MIN % -1 and INT_MIN / -1 *should* be made defined by -fwrapv; that's
bug 30484.
Without -fwrapv, C11 made explicit the intent that the modulo operation i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55890
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener 2013-01-07
15:34:48 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 7 15:34:43 2013
New Revision: 194975
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194975
Log:
2013-01-07 Richard Biener
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55718
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55890
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
Summary|[4.7/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55719
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55753
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2013-01-07 15:40:16
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> It's a global, why should it get collected?
Because it is empty when ggc_collect is called.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55900
Bug #: 55900
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55900
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener 2013-01-07
15:41:18 UTC ---
Reducing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55789
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55797
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55829
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55851
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55878
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #1 from Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55900
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55890
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Summary|Bad memor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-01-07 16:09:14 UTC ---
On 1/7/2013 7:50 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Guess related to -fintrinsic-module-path.
Have being doing a regression search and it seems to be
pointing to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55882
--- Comment #3 from Jan Smets 2013-01-07
16:20:32 UTC ---
: :
...
20: 03c21021 adduv0,s8,v0 20: 03c21021 adduv0,s8,v0
24: 8c44000c lw a0,12(v0) | 24:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55882
--- Comment #4 from Jan Smets 2013-01-07
16:22:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 29099
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29099
testcase-pr55882.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54461
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay 2013-01-07
16:23:13 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jan 7 16:22:59 2013
New Revision: 194981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194981
Log:
Backport from 2013-01-07 trunk r194
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55594
--- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn 2013-01-07 16:32:04
UTC ---
I re-ran a patched version of configure on AIX and it correctly does not define
HWCAP_FLAGS as -nH, so the configure patch seems to work as intended on AIX.
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-07
16:34:14 UTC ---
Ah, ok, seems indeed to be HWI size related and also (due to an earlier bug)
related to the revision you've mentioned.
So, with an i686-linux -> hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 cross thi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55594
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55470
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-07
16:54:39 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Jan 7 16:54:33 2013
New Revision: 194983
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194983
Log:
Support -fuse-ld=bfd and -fuse-ld
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55898
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
