[Bug c++/55742] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause "prototype does not match" errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #5 from Sriraman Tallam 2012-12-20 19:36:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:21 PM, tmsriram at google dot com > wrote: > > > However, with function multiversioning, this will become a problem as

[Bug rtl-optimization/55106] ice: Maximum number of LRA constraint passes is achieved (15)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55106 --- Comment #6 from Ruben Van Boxem 2012-12-20 19:42:02 UTC --- I can also add that GMP 5.0.5 does not trigger this ICE.

[Bug c++/55742] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause "prototype does not match" errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 davidxl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xinliangli at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug sanitizer/55374] [asan] -static-libasan -static-libstdc++ doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374 --- Comment #7 from Joost VandeVondele 2012-12-20 19:55:32 UTC --- Thanks now bootstrap completes. It seems to me that libgfortran is not built with -fsanitize=address despite --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan Is there a way to mak

[Bug sanitizer/55374] [asan] -static-libasan -static-libstdc++ doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-20 19:58:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Thanks now bootstrap completes. > > It seems to me that libgfortran is not built with -fsanitize=address despite > --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan

[Bug c++/55768] New: Use of unknown __attribute__ in function definition is flagged with an error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55768 Bug #: 55768 Summary: Use of unknown __attribute__ in function definition is flagged with an error Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug sanitizer/55374] [asan] -static-libasan -static-libstdc++ doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374 --- Comment #9 from Joost VandeVondele 2012-12-20 20:05:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > bootstrap-asan is for bootstrapping GCC with -fsanitize=address. > It is orthogonal from compiling target run-time li

[Bug debug/49532] Dwarf Error: wrong version in compilation unit header (is 1024, should be 2, 3, or 4) [in module D:\mingw.tests\l.dll]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49532 --- Comment #3 from Pawel Sikora 2012-12-20 20:05:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > This issue was in fact a binutils problem. This issue is fixed. Therefore I > close this bug as invalid. could you tell which binutils release fix

[Bug sanitizer/55374] [asan] -static-libasan -static-libstdc++ doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-20 20:11:55 UTC --- cd obj*/x86_64*/libgfortran; make clean; \ make CFLAGS="-std=gnu99 -g -O2 -fsanitize=address " \ FCFLAGS="-g -O2 -fsanitize=address" LDFLAGS="-B `pwd`/../libsanitizer/asan/.

[Bug debug/49532] Dwarf Error: wrong version in compilation unit header (is 1024, should be 2, 3, or 4) [in module D:\mingw.tests\l.dll]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49532 --- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-20 20:33:04 UTC --- Well, I did my test with 2.23.50 (head) version. But most fixes were done for 2.22 AFAIR.

[Bug sanitizer/55374] [asan] -static-libasan -static-libstdc++ doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374 --- Comment #11 from Joost VandeVondele 2012-12-20 20:43:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > cd obj*/x86_64*/libgfortran; make clean; \ > make CFLAGS="-std=gnu99 -g -O2 -fsanitize=address " \ > FCFLAGS="-g -O2 -fsanitize=address" LDF

[Bug target/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243 --- Comment #30 from Eric Botcazou 2012-12-20 21:45:11 UTC --- > Almost nothing in GCC was added without precedent: Features were added because > backend X needed them or frontend Y needed them. To reject an extension just > because only

[Bug ada/52123] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc bootstrap with ada fails on mingw target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52123 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/55565] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-mov-1.c scan-assembler-not fmr [0-9]+,[0-9]+

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55565 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/55766] template alias is not equivalent (const-ness is not recognized)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55766 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug sanitizer/55374] [asan] -static-libasan -static-libstdc++ doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374 Jack Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at nitro dot

[Bug target/55769] New: unnecessary spill/reload to compose register pair

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55769 Bug #: 55769 Summary: unnecessary spill/reload to compose register pair Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhance

[Bug debug/55579] SRA doesn't create debug stmts when they would be useful

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55579 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-12-21 01:41:18 UTC --- FWIW, the patch in comment 4 makes sense to me. Thanks!

[Bug bootstrap/54128] [4.8 Regression] GCC does not bootstrap on little endian mips due to mis-compare on tree-data-ref.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128 --- Comment #15 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-12-21 01:52:47 UTC --- Steve, the patch referenced in comment 12 makes sense to me. I agree with Jakub's comment that the first hunk shouldn't make any difference, because debug insns don't have D

[Bug c/55770] New: when compiling code with -fwhole-program and -fipa-matrix-reorg,compiler will produce wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55770 Bug #: 55770 Summary: when compiling code with -fwhole-program and -fipa-matrix-reorg,compiler will produce wrong code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug tree-optimization/55770] when compiling code with -fwhole-program and -fipa-matrix-reorg,compiler will produce wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55770 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c

[Bug rtl-optimization/55757] Suboptimal interrupt prologue/epilogue for ARMv7-M (Cortex-M3)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55757 Joey Ye changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joey.ye at arm dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug rtl-optimization/55757] Suboptimal interrupt prologue/epilogue for ARMv7-M (Cortex-M3)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55757 --- Comment #5 from Joey Ye 2012-12-21 03:32:21 UTC --- However, there is room to improve both performance and stack consumption in case of Os: extern void bar(int *); void foo() { int a; bar(&a); } Built with -mcpu=cort

[Bug c/55771] New: Negation and type conversion incorrectly exchanged

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55771 Bug #: 55771 Summary: Negation and type conversion incorrectly exchanged Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-

[Bug c/55771] Negation and type conversion incorrectly exchanged

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55771 Paul Pluzhnikov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppluzhnikov at google dot

[Bug c++/55766] template alias is not equivalent (const-ness is not recognized)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55766 --- Comment #4 from Leonid Volnitsky 2012-12-21 05:32:23 UTC --- And as I just found, dup of bug 54648 too, which I reported on 2012-09 and found bad commit.

[Bug libstdc++/50160] vector comparison very slow (no overload)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160 --- Comment #34 from albcl111 2012-12-21 06:46:07 UTC --- positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog AIHL http://www.accidentinjuryhelplines.co.uk/

[Bug c/55771] Negation and type conversion incorrectly exchanged

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55771 davidxl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xinliangli at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug rtl-optimization/55757] Suboptimal interrupt prologue/epilogue for ARMv7-M (Cortex-M3)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55757 --- Comment #6 from Freddie Chopin 2012-12-21 07:08:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Former is better on code size, latter wins on performance. Hopefully this > explains everything. Indeed, it's clear now. Thank you for your time!

[Bug c++/55772] New: "Jump crosses initialization" error spurious when var is unused

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55772 Bug #: 55772 Summary: "Jump crosses initialization" error spurious when var is unused Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/55750] [4.8 Regression] :-( in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7646

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55750 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

<    1   2