-apple-darwin10.8.0/4.8.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0
Configured with: ../gcc-4.8-20121211/configure --prefix=/sw
--prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.8 --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.8/info
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto,objc,obj-c++,java --with-gmp=/sw
--with-libiconv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53094
--- Comment #14 from Marc Glisse 2012-12-11
20:20:34 UTC ---
Author: glisse
Date: Tue Dec 11 20:20:23 2012
New Revision: 194421
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194421
Log:
2012-12-11 Marc Glisse
PR c++/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55656
Bug #: 55656
Summary: objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55654
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-12-11
20:34:32 UTC ---
I don't see this with Xcode 3.2.6:
PASS: obj-c++.dg/torture/strings/string1.mm -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none
-fnext-runtime (test for excess errors)
PASS: obj-c++.d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55657
Bug #: 55657
Summary: objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin12
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55655
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55655
--- Comment #2 from Matthew Woehlke
2012-12-11 21:06:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 28930
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28930
example code
Here's a simplified concrete example. Since we are talking about correct
vi
::operator<< > (__out=@0xae180, __s=0x2b78 "Testing
objc_copyProtocolList ()...\n") at ostream:540
540}
(gdb)
main () at
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121211/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/gnu-api-2-objc.mm:106
106id my_protocol = @protocol
/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++/../../
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121211/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/method-12.mm
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -nostdinc++
-I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0/libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55533
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-11
21:32:15 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Dec 11 21:32:11 2012
New Revision: 194424
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194424
Log:
Add libstdc++-raw-cxx.m4 and use
/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++/../../
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121211/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/proto-lossage-7.mm
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -nostdinc++
-I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin12.2.0/libstdc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54883
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55655
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-11
21:49:13 UTC ---
Which symbols are hidden which you don't want to be?
What do you mean "instantiation failed"? You get a warning but it works.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51513
Emil L changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||empann at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39244
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55611
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2012-12-11 22:12:01
UTC ---
Created attachment 28931
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28931
Use tree code to determine the canonical order
In this patch, I remove the external calls to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55631
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-11
22:28:06 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Dec 11 22:28:01 2012
New Revision: 194429
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194429
Log:
PR libstdc++/55631
* include/e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54416
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55631
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Component|c+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55539
--- Comment #3 from Harald Anlauf 2012-12-11 22:33:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I played a little bit with the code and found that the
following patch appears to fix my problem:
Index: libgfortran/io/write_float.def
==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51513
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54883
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-11
22:46:16 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Dec 11 22:46:08 2012
New Revision: 194430
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194430
Log:
PR c++/54883
* decl2.c (min_vis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54883
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-11
22:46:29 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Dec 11 22:46:22 2012
New Revision: 194431
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194431
Log:
PR c++/54883
* decl2.c (min_vis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54883
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2012-12-11
22:46:51 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Dec 11 22:46:37 2012
New Revision: 194432
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194432
Log:
PR c++/54883
* decl2.c (min_vis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54883
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #155 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-11 22:57:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #154)
> What was the size of the gcc lto/pgo binary before the change to use the
> histogram? Was it close to the gcc 4.7 lto/pgo size? In that case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55655
--- Comment #4 from Matthew Woehlke
2012-12-11 23:34:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Which symbols are hidden which you don't want to be?
ptr
> What do you mean "instantiation failed"? You get a warning but it works.
It fails
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55533
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39244
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin 2012-12-11
23:40:34 UTC ---
Still see these on my arm box. glibc is now somewhat old.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-12/msg00871.html
Box has a Marvell processor.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55652
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55630
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa*-*-* (32-bit)
Hos
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #156 from Teresa Johnson 2012-12-12
00:00:17 UTC ---
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:57 PM, markus at trippelsdorf dot de
wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
>
> --- Comment #155 from Markus Trippelsdorf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55630
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2012-12-12
00:12:13 UTC ---
Breakpoint 1, simplify_subreg (outermode=SImode, op=0x40660c70,
innermode=BLKmode, byte=0) at ../../gcc/gcc/simplify-rtx.c:5682
5682 gcc_assert (innermode != BLKmo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55630
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin 2012-12-12
01:00:59 UTC ---
Introduced between 192625 and 192884.
--enable-threads=posix
--enable-__cxa_atexit --build=hppa-linux-gnu --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-java-gc=boehm
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,java,ada,lto
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20121211 (experimental) [trunk revision 194379] (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55630
--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin 2012-12-12
03:58:29 UTC ---
Introduced by the following commit:
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat Oct 20 21:00:23 2012
New Revision: 192641
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192641
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324
--- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-12-12
05:09:09 UTC ---
Another proposed patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg00766.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55658
Bug #: 55658
Summary: bitfields and __attribute__((packed)) generate
horrible code on x86_64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55658
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55659
Bug #: 55659
Summary: [4.8 Regression] [SH] Build failure with ICE in
dwarf2out_var_location, at dwarf2out.c:20748
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55658
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55410
Kostya Serebryany changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55660
Bug #: 55660
Summary: ICE instead of some warning during lto build
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55659
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-12
07:28:32 UTC ---
Please provide preprocessed testcase and gcc options, so that this can be
looked at from a cross-compiler.
Very likely md reorg pass does something wrong.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55659
--- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-12-12
07:34:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Please provide preprocessed testcase and gcc options, so that this can be
> looked at from a cross-compiler.
> Very likely md reorg pass does somet
101 - 146 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
