http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55597
--- Comment #15 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-07 08:10:44 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Dec 7 08:10:37 2012
New Revision: 194292
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194292
Log:
Backport from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55597
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39607
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.0 |---
Summary|[4.5 Reg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40856
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |---
--- Comment #17 from Richa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43716
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
Target Milestone|4.6.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55201
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55273
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55276
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55277
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55284
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54975
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-07 09:53:14 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Dec 7 09:53:04 2012
New Revision: 194297
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194297
Log:
2012-12-07 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54975
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39464
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-07
10:04:58 UTC ---
Two of those three will always result in target_cmp != 0, because char is
either signed or unsigned, so for -fsigned-char we don't warn on
signed char *p = (char *) ptr;
char
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55273
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2012-12-07
10:06:56 UTC ---
Reduced testcase:
extern int debug_threads;
extern void sigsuspend (void);
void my_waitpid (int flags, int wnohang)
{
while (1)
{
if (flags & 0x8000)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55330
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631
Igor Zamyatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55187
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23855
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55342
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55387
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55419
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631
--- Comment #10 from stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com 2012-12-07 10:16:49 UTC ---
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:11 AM, izamyatin at gmail dot com wrote:
> Looks like there is some garbage in BLOCK_FOR_INSN field for barrier
> instruction...
A BA
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55127
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55433
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-darwin
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40856
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-07
10:22:05 UTC ---
Yeah, BLOCK_FOR_INSN is invalid on BARRIER, reproduced with a RTL checking
build now, where RTL checking fails. Looking into it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631
--- Comment #12 from Igor Zamyatin 2012-12-07
10:24:04 UTC ---
Oh, right, in this case just more checks are needed for
distance_non_agu_define_in_bb in i386.c. I'll add them. Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55456
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55458
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55466
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #8 from Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55481
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55545
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55158
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55273
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52573
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-12-07
11:16:55 UTC ---
I don't get the invalid insn in the trunk, in spite of still having both REG
%d2 notes on it before rnreg.
My attempts to avoid the REG_DEAD note were unfruitful (reg-stack
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54731
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55273
--- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-07
11:40:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Douglas, can you help investigate the mmap error?
>
> Run "gcc -v". It will show a line executing the program cc1. Run gdb
> on cc1 with the ex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54781
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #4 from Ri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54783
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54838
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55613
Bug #: 55613
Summary: Better warning for reference to struct type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631
--- Comment #14 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-07
11:59:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Please hold on with that, seems BB_END is BARRIER, which is wrong.
> Starting with distilling a testcase...
Perhaps Alex' is right that the rea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54886
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55056
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener 2012-12-07
12:06:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > -Og -g0 doesn't produce debug info, so it should fail all debugger tests.
> > -Og -g should work.
>
> -Og -g0 is nee
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55078
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55614
Bug #: 55614
Summary: vector extensions cause movdqa to be generated for
memcpy on unaligned buffer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Summary|[4.8 Regre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55615
Bug #: 55615
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Failed to bootstrap with
--with-arch=core2 --with-cpu=atom
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53475
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55615
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55590
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor 2012-12-07
12:50:46 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Dec 7 12:50:43 2012
New Revision: 194300
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194300
Log:
2012-12-07 Martin Jambor
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55079
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #10 from Richar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55104
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Depends on|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55466
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-07 13:02:12
UTC ---
I am testing this patch:
---
diff --git a/gcc/lto-symtab.c b/gcc/lto-symtab.c
index 0b0cdac..295fd37 100644
--- a/gcc/lto-symtab.c
+++ b/gcc/lto-symtab.c
@@ -443,10 +443,6 @@ lt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55078
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor 2012-12-07
13:05:57 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Dec 7 13:05:52 2012
New Revision: 194301
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194301
Log:
2012-12-07 Martin Jambor
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55590
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55078
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55122
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54886
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener 2012-12-07
13:16:35 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Dec 7 13:16:28 2012
New Revision: 194302
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194302
Log:
2012-12-07 Richard Biener
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54886
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55127
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55127
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2012-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
--- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-12-07 13:33:16 UTC ---
On 6-Dec-12, at 1:39 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
> What
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-12-07
13:34:36 UTC ---
rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> spill in class 'R0_REG'
Spilling is a bug in the register allocator, or am I missing something.
Besides that, I am getting this mail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52573
--- Comment #7 from Kenneth Zadeck 2012-12-07
13:39:10 UTC ---
alexandre,
when we did the dataflow stuff, my expertise was primarily in deciding which
problems could be applied to which of the passes and how and when to actually
(re)sol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43716
--- Comment #42 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-12-07 13:40:17 UTC ---
> Re-adjust target milestone. Please somebody revisit the regression status
> and fill in known-to-work/fail fields. ISTR it only fails on darwin.
(1) doduc.f90 is c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55141
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55151
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55153
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55154
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55158
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55198
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404
--- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-12-07 13:50:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> > Fixed?
>
> Note on x86_64-apple-darwin12 which uses a newer Objective C runtime. There
> are
> failures in...
It would probably be n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55614
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55547
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55616
Bug #: 55616
Summary: bogus warning about undefined overflow after overflow
check
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55614
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-07
14:14:33 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 7 14:14:25 2012
New Revision: 194303
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194303
Log:
PR bootstrap/54926
* Makefile.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-07
14:19:31 UTC ---
Please post patches to gcc-patches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43716
--- Comment #43 from Richard Biener 2012-12-07
14:28:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #42)
> > Re-adjust target milestone. Please somebody revisit the regression status
> > and fill in known-to-work/fail fields. ISTR it only fails on darw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55127
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55614
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
Known to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55569
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55594
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55616
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617
Bug #: 55617
Summary: static constructors are not being instrumented
correctly on darwin
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55198
--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin 2012-12-07
14:47:55 UTC ---
Patch is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg00042.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-07
14:48:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 28894
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28894
assembly file for covariant3.C compiled with -fsanitize=address on
x86_64-apple-darwin12
As
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-07
14:50:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 28895
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28895
gdb log of stepi walk from 38th breakpoint of
__dyld__ZN16ImageLoaderMachO18doModInitFunctions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404
--- Comment #22 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu 2012-12-07 14:53:27 UTC ---
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 01:50:40PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54404
>
> --- Comment #21 from Do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55614
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor 2012-12-07
14:56:15 UTC ---
As far as I can remember, my changes in revision 186501 depended on
previous work in expander and cannot be simply backported without
those prerequisites (or breaking strict-ali
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo