http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561
Bug #: 55561
Summary: TSAN crashes for Fortran
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
--- Comment #7 from Victor Gaydov 2012-12-02 08:16:04
UTC ---
I also have experienced bug 7.
I'm porting a project that uses std::auto_ptr in several places to c++11.
However, there are no deprecated warnings because it happened that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55560
--- Comment #2 from pj at ecstaticlyrics dot com 2012-12-02 09:10:35 UTC ---
GNU C Library (Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.15-0ubuntu20) stable release version 2.15
I downloaded glibc 2.16, but it encounters an error while compiling.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561
Dmitry Vyukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dvyukov at google dot com
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #147 from Jan Hubicka 2012-12-02 09:23:09
UTC ---
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
>
> --- Comment #146 from Markus Trippelsdorf
> 2012-12-02 07:36:02 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #145)
> > >
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Vyukov 2012-12-02
09:35:41 UTC ---
Well, then maybe it will work. But we did not do anything special for Fortran
and OpenMP, and did not do any testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2012-12-02
09:56:41 UTC ---
Personally, I'm not aware of any wa, if somebody finds one, please add it here,
thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2012-12-02
09:59:35 UTC ---
Hmm, this seems to be caused by
Forced statement unreachable: pretmp_516 = coef_x[pretmp_515];
Forced statement unreachable: pretmp_513 = coef_x[pretmp_512];
Forced statement unr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele
2012-12-02 10:11:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Hmm, this seems to be caused by
> Forced statement unreachable: pretmp_516 = coef_x[pretmp_515];
> Forced statement unreachable: pretmp_513 = co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561
--- Comment #4 from Kostya Serebryany 2012-12-02
10:28:10 UTC ---
Note that tsan currently requires to use -pie linker flag (and either -fPIC or
-fPIE compiler flag).
Obviously, your failure happens before the run-time library has a chanc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2012-12-02 11:03:53 UTC
---
> I'm pretty sure there are no out-of-bounds. In particular coef_x is easy to
> check, it is only used as coef_x(:,lxp) where lxp is the loop bound 0..lp
> consistent with its def
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #148 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-02 11:57:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #147)
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
> >
> > --- Comment #146 from Markus Trippelsdorf
> > 2012-12-02 07:36:02 UTC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-02
12:38:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Not planning to work on this soon since there's a reasonable workaround.
Jason, that workaround is only for function templates, not class template
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55562
Bug #: 55562
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/sms-* on powerpc*-*-*
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55562
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
> > Please try to reduce HOT_BB_COUNT_WS_PERMILLE to 990. I also see some
> > regressions
> > on some SPEC benchmarks (such as GCC) and this helps. If it doesn't it
> > would be
> > nice to know what value is needed for comparable size.
>
> Unfortunately it doesn't help much, because with "--para
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #149 from Jan Hubicka 2012-12-02 15:05:52
UTC ---
> > Please try to reduce HOT_BB_COUNT_WS_PERMILLE to 990. I also see some
> > regressions
> > on some SPEC benchmarks (such as GCC) and this helps. If it doesn't it
> > would b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55562
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-12-02
16:04:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 28853
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28853
simplified test case in plain C
The regression started with Richard Biener's "[PATCH] T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #10 from tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-02 16:40:34 UTC ---
Author: tejohnson
Date: Sun Dec 2 16:40:28 2012
New Revision: 194055
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194055
Log:
2012-12-02 Teresa Joh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55563
Bug #: 55563
Summary: OpenMP not marking variable as thread-local
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54926
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55563
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-ibm-aix*
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55411
jk3064 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #150 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-02 18:03:28 UTC ---
For comparison I've just disabled skia and build with LTO only;
the size looks good for this case: 31356968
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55564
Bug #: 55564
Summary: internal error using decltype of a template type
parameter for late-specified function result type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Versio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54838
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek 2012-12-02
20:17:16 UTC ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Sun Dec 2 20:16:09 2012
New Revision: 194060
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194060
Log:
PR54838
Added:
trunk/gcc/test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54838
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55565
Bug #: 55565
Summary: [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-mov-1.c
scan-assembler-not fmr [0-9]+,[0-9]+
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55566
Bug #: 55566
Summary: [4.8 regression] [IA64] ICE during bootstrap (related
to recent "vec" re-implementation?)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55566
--- Comment #1 from Gary Funck 2012-12-02 20:32:03
UTC ---
Created attachment 28855
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28855
build failure Ia64 segv - continues to fail in r194044 (in libgcc config. test)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55567
Bug #: 55567
Summary: [4.8 regression] FAIL:
gfortran.dg/typebound_operator_18.f90 -O (test for
excess errors)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55567
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55560
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-12-02 20:39:23 UTC ---
This would have been glibc bug 3976 which was fixed for cos by:
commit 804360ed837e3347c9cd9738f25345d2587a1242
Author: Joseph Myers
Date: Fri Mar 2 20:51:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55568
Bug #: 55568
Summary: [4.8 regression] FAIL:
gfortran.dg/allocate_error_4.f90 -O (test for excess
errors)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55568
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55566
--- Comment #2 from Gary Funck 2012-12-02 20:43:45
UTC ---
The configure options specified are:
CC=/usr/bin/gcc
CXX=/usr/bin/g++
$src/configure --enable-languages=c,c++
--enable-checking --disable-bootstrap --disable-multilib
--disab
Teresa comitted another bugfix just today. So with bit of luck it will work now?
I will try to look deeper into it ASAP, but I am just getting ready for trip to
USA.
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #151 from Jan Hubicka 2012-12-02 20:52:13
UTC ---
Teresa comitted another bugfix just today. So with bit of luck it will work
now?
I will try to look deeper into it ASAP, but I am just getting ready for trip to
USA.
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #152 from Jan Hubicka 2012-12-02 21:09:24
UTC ---
Also I suppose you don't have comparsion to 4.7 handy? (I am curious because of
inliner heuristic re-tunning)
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-02
21:11:07 UTC ---
Are you testing with all the pending unreviewed TSAN fixes?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg01875.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg02578.html
http
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #153 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-02 21:13:21 UTC ---
On 2012.12.02 at 21:09 +, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
>
> --- Comment #152 from Jan Hubicka 2012-12-02 21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53814
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2012-12-02
21:13:57 UTC ---
On trunk, "n" is loaded using generic code to load a misaligned object.
So, test doesn't fail.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55521
--- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-02
21:25:32 UTC ---
Revised patch posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg00084.html. Also tested with a
build of xplor-nih (a complex mix of c, c++ and fortran code) which has alway
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55566
--- Comment #3 from Gary Funck 2012-12-02 21:32:14
UTC ---
This failure may be related to the use of the installed gcc compiler (gcc (SUSE
Linux) 4.3.4 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 152973]). I tried a gcc 4.7.0 compiler
that we built circa Fe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55566
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55569
Bug #: 55569
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: in check_probability, at
basic-block.h:944 with -ftree-vectorize
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55566
--- Comment #5 from Gary Funck 2012-12-02 21:45:52
UTC ---
Cancel the previous comment regarding the idea that this might be related to
using the system installed gcc. The build failed while trying to build gmp,
and hadn't gotten to tryin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55566
--- Comment #6 from Gary Funck 2012-12-02 21:48:28
UTC ---
"This isn't a bootstrap since you pass --disable-bootstrap to configure ..."
Agreed. I didnt' know how to classify this problem.
Since the version of 4.7.0 that I used appears
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55566
--- Comment #7 from Gary Funck 2012-12-02 21:49:49
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The compiler bootstraps fine for me btw.
Which version of the host compiler did you use to run the initial build step?
Which OS and target architectu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55566
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-12-02
22:03:42 UTC ---
> Which version of the host compiler did you use to run the initial build step?
This is a 4.5.x compiler configured for ia64-generic-linux-gnu on a RHEL 5.8.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55569
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55564
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55567
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55568
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55568
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-12-03
01:47:04 UTC ---
Oops, both this and the fail in PR55567 are gone at least at r194057.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55566
--- Comment #9 from Gary Funck 2012-12-03 02:02:18
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I will try building svn revision 152973 on an x86-64 box, and see if the
> problem can be reproduced there.
I built fully bootstrapped the gcc/g++ com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55570
Bug #: 55570
Summary: Undefined variable in alignment compiler directive
causes compiler segfault
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55521
Dmitry Vyukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dvyukov at google dot com
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-12-03
06:39:56 UTC ---
> And in config.gcc there is
>
> tmake_file="avr/t-avr avr/t-multilib"
>
>
> Thus, the assumption is that AWK, SHELL and STAMP are set correctly and
> respective tools a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55566
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #10 from Eric B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #26 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-03 06:56:02
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Dec 3 06:55:55 2012
New Revision: 194066
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194066
Log:
PR target/53912
* pointer-set.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #27 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-03 06:56:27
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Dec 3 06:56:16 2012
New Revision: 194067
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194067
Log:
PR target/53912
* pointer-set.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #28 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-03 07:01:50
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Dec 3 07:01:43 2012
New Revision: 194069
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194069
Log:
PR target/53912
* tree-dump.c (du
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #29 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-03 07:02:26
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Dec 3 07:02:17 2012
New Revision: 194070
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194070
Log:
PR target/53912
* tree-dump.c (du
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #30 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-03 07:04:56
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Dec 3 07:04:50 2012
New Revision: 194071
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194071
Log:
PR target/53912
* ggc-common.c (P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #31 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-03 07:05:31
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Dec 3 07:05:26 2012
New Revision: 194072
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194072
Log:
PR target/53912
* ggc-common.c (P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55568
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55567
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561
--- Comment #6 from Joost VandeVondele
2012-12-03 07:41:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Are you testing with all the pending unreviewed TSAN fixes?
Ah.. no, I will retest once they are in trunk. Thanks!
73 matches
Mail list logo
