http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55132
Bug #: 55132
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr45453.C
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55120
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Krügler
2012-10-30 07:28:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I think the standard is unclear on this. That defect report has been queried
> by
> experts.
Let me clarify that I have not even tried to interpret the st
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55133
Bug #: 55133
Summary: gcc-4.8-20121028 dubious array bound check
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55105
--- Comment #1 from Michael Haubenwallner 2012-10-30 07:58:20 UTC ---
Feels like a dup of bug#52623, or vice-versa.
Haven't tried --disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx recently, not sure if this
still should work with current trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54953
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-10-30
08:08:08 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Oct 30 08:08:01 2012
New Revision: 192978
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192978
Log:
PR debug/54953
* valtrack.h (DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55132
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2012-10-30 08:16:40
UTC ---
The commit also causes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr44974.c scan-assembler call[^\n]*_Exit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48374
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev 2012-10-30
08:25:24 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Tue Oct 30 08:25:16 2012
New Revision: 192979
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192979
Log:
Backport from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48374
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54985
--- Comment #11 from Igor Zamyatin 2012-10-30
08:32:01 UTC ---
Are there any plans to backport this to 4.7?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54386
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo 2012-10-30 09:04:37
UTC ---
Just for the record, this seems to happen only for mem loads. Mem stores
expand as expected.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54988
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo 2012-10-30 09:07:17
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue Oct 30 09:07:08 2012
New Revision: 192982
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192982
Log:
PR target/54988
* config/sh/sh.m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55058
Sebastian Huber changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54963
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo 2012-10-30 09:22:31
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue Oct 30 09:22:14 2012
New Revision: 192983
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192983
Log:
PR target/54963
* config/sh/iter
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55131
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55085
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55079
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener 2012-10-30
09:32:45 UTC ---
*** Bug 55085 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55133
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55079
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nat...@t-online.de
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55132
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55130
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55134
Bug #: 55134
Summary: associate construct and assumed size array
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54012
--- Comment #3 from Sergey Rodionov 2012-10-30
09:52:04 UTC ---
> What does gdb tell you?
gdb tells:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x7779f8f2 in __parse_one_specmb () from /lib64/libc.so.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54012
--- Comment #4 from Sergey Rodionov 2012-10-30
09:56:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Can't reproduce with 4.6.3.
Have you compiled with -lgfortran? If yes then probably this bug is some
specific problem of Mageia 2 distributive...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55109
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Mulcahy 2012-10-30
10:17:30 UTC ---
Reduced test case here https://gist.github.com/3979454, as provided by creduce.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55124
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
Summary|ICE in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
Bug #: 55135
Summary: Segfault of gcc on a big file
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55124
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|rguenth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55111
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2012-10-30
10:27:51 UTC ---
We have an unfolded stmt:
(gdb) call debug_gimple_stmt (def_stmt)
pretmp_36 = (long int) 18446744073709551615;
I have a patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
--- Comment #1 from benoit.barbot at gmail dot com 2012-10-30 10:28:22 UTC ---
The file is too big to be attached. Here is a URL where you can find it:
http://www.lsv.ens-cachan.fr/~barbot/cosmos/files/buggcc.ii
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55122
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54012
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek 2012-10-30
10:47:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Have you compiled with -lgfortran?
Yeah.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55136
Bug #: 55136
Summary: template class member template explicit instanciation
fails if non template overload exists
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-10-30 10:58:48 UTC ---
With Jakub's patch the testcase mentioned in comment 2:
http://llvm.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=9362&action=edit
now takes 2:30 minutes to compile (up from 1:40).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55118
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener 2012-10-30
11:11:35 UTC ---
We can't really do much here without breaking type-based alias analysis and
data dependence analysis (which depends on seeing only array-refs when they
were present in the orig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-10-30 11:24:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> With Jakub's patch the testcase mentioned in comment 2:
> http://llvm.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=9362&action=edit
> now takes 2:30 minutes to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55134
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Targ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55109
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Mulcahy 2012-10-30
11:41:43 UTC ---
New, improved backtrace:
#0 0x004e00d7 in tsubst_copy (t=, args=0x75602578,
complain=3, in_decl=) at
/home/daniel/Documents/packages/ABS/gcc/src/gcc-4.7.2/gcc/c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55109
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-30
11:53:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 28572
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28572
Testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55109
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Paolo C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55111
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2012-10-30
12:02:45 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Oct 30 12:02:39 2012
New Revision: 192984
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192984
Log:
2012-10-30 Richard Biener
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55111
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55137
Bug #: 55137
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Unexpected static structure
initialization
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55136
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #12 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-10-30 12:25:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> http://llvm.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=9362&action=edit
> now takes 2:30 minutes to compile (up from 1:40).
This regression is caused by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55121
--- Comment #11 from christophe.lyon at st dot com 2012-10-30 12:53:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 28574
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28574
configargs.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55121
--- Comment #12 from christophe.lyon at st dot com 2012-10-30 12:55:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > eval.c: In function 'Ge':
> > eval.c:792:1: internal compiler error: in df_compact_blocks, at
> > df-cor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55137
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55121
--- Comment #13 from christophe.lyon at st dot com 2012-10-30 12:57:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > I cannot reproduce the problem with a cross-compiler from
> > powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu to arm-eabi at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55137
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55138
Bug #: 55138
Summary: [4.7 Regression] inlining fails with -O2 on gcc 4.7.2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: maj
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55121
--- Comment #14 from christophe.lyon at st dot com 2012-10-30 13:18:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 28576
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28576
eval.c.041i.profile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54012
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl
2012-10-30 13:20:46 UTC ---
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 09:52:04AM +, astroseger at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54012
>
> --- Comment #3 from Sergey Rodionov 201
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55121
--- Comment #15 from christophe.lyon at st dot com 2012-10-30 13:23:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Can you please also attach the output of -fdump-ipa-profile-all
> which should be eval.c.041i.profile. I have my dump here, it should
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
--- Comment #4 from benoit.barbot at gmail dot com 2012-10-30 13:29:04 UTC ---
When i remove line in the file the segfault disappear. The size of the file
seams to trigger the segfault.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54012
--- Comment #7 from Sergey Rodionov 2012-10-30
14:03:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 09:52:04AM +, astroseger at gmail dot com wrote:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54012
> >
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55108
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55108
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw 2012-10-30
14:15:43 UTC ---
At armv6t2 and later we have a ubfx instruction available and that is enough to
mask this bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54883
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Huber
2012-10-30 14:16:05 UTC ---
Known to work GCC 4.0.4, 4.1.2, and 4.2.4:
echo "namespace { enum E { E1 }; } void f(E e) { }" | tee a.c b.c
namespace { enum E { E1 }; } void f(E e) { }
/scratch/install-g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55138
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55132
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55138
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-10-30
14:47:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 28577
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28577
reduced test case in C
C++ not needed, fails also in C, works with gcc-4.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55132
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2012-10-30 15:06:23
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Are you sure it was r192964 for your target (wild guess x86_64-linux)? For
> cris-elf, I see this regression introduced in the (] range 192943:192956.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55028
--- Comment #4 from oleg at smolsky dot net 2012-10-30 15:09:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 28578
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28578
exports
Here is a patch that addresses the issue. IE my tests and apps link now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55138
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54985
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression] dom|[4.7 Regression] dom
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55124
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53708
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55124
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55139
Bug #: 55139
Summary: __atomic store does not support __ATOMIC_HLE_RELEASE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53708
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-10-30 17:10:52 UTC ---
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, bergner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53708
>
> Peter Bergner changed:
>
>What
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55124
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-10-30 17:12:46 UTC ---
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55124
>
> vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54012
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl
2012-10-30 17:57:51 UTC ---
> > > > What does gdb tell you?
> > >
> > > gdb tells:
> > >
> > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > > 0x7779f8f2 in __parse_one_specmb () from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-10-30
18:24:17 UTC ---
IMHO it is really not useful to dup together completely unrelated var-tracking
PRs together.
test-tgmath.i clearly has nothing to do with frame_pointer_needed frame
replacemen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53708
--- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner 2012-10-30
18:27:36 UTC ---
Do you mean Richard Sandiford's comment regarding your patch and then your
reply?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg01229.html
Hmmm, if attribute((__aligned__
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53708
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35305
--- Comment #4 from davidxl 2012-10-30 18:57:18
UTC ---
The suggested transformation can be useful in some cases, but won't be general
enough. The listed example is an extreme case. For instance, the second a+b
instance does not have to be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54386
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54012
--- Comment #9 from Sergey Rodionov 2012-10-30
19:35:15 UTC ---
>
> This does not look like a libgfortran issue. Do you have
> valgrind on your system? Can you run the good and bad
> executable under valgrind? This appears to be a b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55120
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Krügler
2012-10-30 19:48:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Curious that G++, Comeau and Clang all accept the example in CWG issue 7,
> despite the rationale (and Mike) indicating it's intended that a virtual
> priv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55116
--- Comment #11 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-30
21:35:42 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Oct 30 21:35:35 2012
New Revision: 192996
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192996
Log:
Add another testcase for PR midd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55141
Bug #: 55141
Summary: [4.8 Regression] wrong code with -fno-split-wide-types
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55138
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54012
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55116
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54012
--- Comment #11 from Sergey Rodionov 2012-10-30
22:37:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > "ldd bad":
> > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fffd97ff000)
> > libquadmath.so.0 => /usr/lib64/libqua
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55093
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-30
22:56:59 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Oct 30 22:56:52 2012
New Revision: 193000
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193000
Log:
Remove lra_in_progress check for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54551
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-30
23:47:43 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Oct 30 23:47:35 2012
New Revision: 193003
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193003
Log:
PR debug/54551
PR debug/54693
* val
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-30
23:47:44 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Oct 30 23:47:35 2012
New Revision: 193003
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193003
Log:
PR debug/54551
PR debug/54693
* va
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51823
Dave Abrahams changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dave at boostpro dot com
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51823
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-31
00:36:48 UTC ---
Thanks, Dave. So IIUC that means a counting iterator or other iterator that
stores a value internally can only be an input iterator, and so can't be used
with reverse_iterat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55093
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142
Bug #: 55142
Summary: [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in
plus_constant, at explow.c:88
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52498
--- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2012-10-31 03:21:10 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Wed Oct 31 03:21:03 2012
New Revision: 193013
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193013
Log:
PR target/52498
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52498
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55143
Bug #: 55143
Summary: vms-c.o:(.toc+0x0): undefined reference to
`c_default_pointer_mode' (building cc1plus)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
