[Bug rtl-optimization/55092] New: [4.8 Regression] LRA doesn't scale

2012-10-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55092 Bug #: 55092 Summary: [4.8 Regression] LRA doesn't scale Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug rtl-optimization/55092] [4.8 Regression] LRA doesn't scale

2012-10-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55092 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug rtl-optimization/55092] [4.8 Regression] LRA doesn't scale

2012-10-26 Thread vmakarov at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55092 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov 2012-10-26 22:49:23 UTC --- LRA reuses stack memory much better than reload (in all modes but especially in -O0). May be that is the reason of the var-tracking problem.

[Bug rtl-optimization/55092] [4.8 Regression] LRA doesn't scale

2012-10-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55092 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-10-26 22:56:55 UTC --- The testcase is compiled with -O2, not -O0.

[Bug rtl-optimization/55092] [4.8 Regression] LRA doesn't scale

2012-10-26 Thread vmakarov at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55092 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov 2012-10-26 22:57:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > LRA reuses stack memory much better than reload (in all modes but especially > in -O0). May be that is the reason of the var-tracking problem.

[Bug rtl-optimization/55092] [4.8 Regression] LRA doesn't scale

2012-10-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55092 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2012-10-26 23:03:05 UTC --- -fno-ira-share-spill-slots doesn't make a difference.

[Bug debug/54402] [4.8 Regression] var-tracking does not scale

2012-10-26 Thread vmakarov at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402 Vladimir Makarov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com -

[Bug c++/55076] ice when compiling lambda function

2012-10-26 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55076 --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-26 23:38:33 UTC --- I think that at some point I had the same trick in my local tree too, then I don't remember sending it to the mailing list, not even as a RFC. I think you should, CC Jason, and

[Bug go/55091] libgo testsuite doesn't support --target_board='unix{-mx32}'

2012-10-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55091 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-10-27 00:01:11 UTC --- One can also use RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board='unix{-mavx}'" to test -mavx. I am not sure if libgo supports it.

[Bug rtl-optimization/55093] New: [4.8 Regression] [x32] -maddress-mode=long failed

2012-10-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55093 Bug #: 55093 Summary: [4.8 Regression] [x32] -maddress-mode=long failed Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/55093] [4.8 Regression] [x32] -maddress-mode=long failed

2012-10-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55093 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-10-27 00:16:52 UTC --- Created attachment 28541 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28541 A testcase

[Bug rtl-optimization/55093] [4.8 Regression] [x32] -maddress-mode=long failed

2012-10-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55093 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-10-27 00:19:22 UTC --- Another zero-extend bug? Breakpoint 1, fancy_abort ( file=0x146ea68 "/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-misc/gcc/config/i386/i386.c", line=14088, function=0x14879e3 "print

[Bug web/54973] [bugzilla] make "Before reporting a bug" notice more prominent

2012-10-26 Thread ian at airs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973 --- Comment #16 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-10-27 00:55:14 UTC --- Thanks!

[Bug web/54973] [bugzilla] make "Before reporting a bug" notice more prominent

2012-10-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54973 --- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski 2012-10-27 00:57:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > The text is now a bit more reddish. Fixed! Thanks that is much better and thanks again for adding this text.

[Bug debug/55094] New: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2224

2012-10-26 Thread d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55094 Bug #: 55094 Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2224 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Sta

[Bug ada/55088] ada tarball missing COPYING file

2012-10-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55088 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-10-27 06:42:10 UTC --- The language specific tar balls are no longer produced. I don't know if we should close this bug as fixed or won't fix.

<    1   2