[Bug c++/54812] [C++11] Delete expression doesn't respect access of defaulted destructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54812 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/54828] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in based_loc_descr at dwarf2out.c:10560 with -g -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54828 Bug #: 54828 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in based_loc_descr at dwarf2out.c:10560 with -g -O0 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Stat

[Bug c++/54091] internal compiler error in class method with many string objects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54091 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug c++/53540] C++11: using fails to be equivalent to typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53540 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-05 21:29:25 UTC --- Dodji, time to ping? ;)

[Bug c++/54091] internal compiler error in class method with many string objects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54091 --- Comment #3 from The Written Word 2012-10-05 21:36:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Have you tried with a current release, 4.6 or 4.7? > > The 4.4 release series is closed and no longer maintained. Sorry, missed this. I'll try

[Bug debug/54826] gdb test case failure (bs15503) due to gaps in lexical block

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54826 dehao at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconf

[Bug target/54829] New: bad optimization: sub followed by cmp w/ zero (x86 & ARM)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54829 Bug #: 54829 Summary: bad optimization: sub followed by cmp w/ zero (x86 & ARM) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/54812] [C++11] Delete expression doesn't respect access of defaulted destructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54812 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-05 23:25:47 UTC --- By the way, this compiles: struct P3 { private: ~P3() = default; }; P3 p3; thus there is little hope that we get an error for #22 ..

[Bug target/54829] bad optimization: sub followed by cmp w/ zero (x86 & ARM)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54829 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug target/54830] New: [SH] Unnecessary exts.w before extu.b

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54830 Bug #: 54830 Summary: [SH] Unnecessary exts.w before extu.b Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug c++/54425] Rvalue/Lvalue overload resolution of templated function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54425 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/54277] Template class member referred to with implicit this inside lambda is incorrectly const-qualified

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54277 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/54207] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in build_noexcept_spec when bool is #defined/typedef'd

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54207 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/54739] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c scan-rtl-dump subreg1 "Splitting reg"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54739 --- Comment #7 from John David Anglin 2012-10-06 00:33:56 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Oct 6 00:33:52 2012 New Revision: 192152 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192152 Log: PR rtl-optimization/54739

[Bug middle-end/54806] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: "___emutls_v.*", ... on x86_64-apple-darwin12

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806 --- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-06 00:47:13 UTC --- I can confirm on 10.7.5 that the provided test case fails with the gcc47-4.7.2 package from current MacPorts but compiles fine with my gcc47-4.7.2 packaging from fink. MacPo

[Bug middle-end/54806] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: "___emutls_v.*", ... on x86_64-apple-darwin12

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806 --- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-06 00:56:37 UTC --- Also for gcc47-4.7.2 from fink, I see... % nm /sw/lib/gcc4.7/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib | grep emutls U ___emutls_get_address 000b72c0 D ___emutls_v._ZSt1

[Bug middle-end/54806] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: "___emutls_v.*", ... on x86_64-apple-darwin12

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806 --- Comment #12 from Jack Howarth 2012-10-06 01:46:04 UTC --- I would also add, regarding the broken emutls support in libstdc++.6.dylib packaged by MacPorts, that clang for darwin11 provides tls support since Xcode 4.2. FSF gcc only suppo

[Bug debug/54826] gdb test case failure (bs15503) due to gaps in lexical block

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54826 --- Comment #1 from dehao at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06 02:27:27 UTC --- A patch is sent to solve this: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg00596.html

[Bug middle-end/54806] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: "___emutls_v.*", ... on x86_64-apple-darwin12

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54806 --- Comment #13 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia 2012-10-06 06:38:54 UTC --- I see this issue with older gcc47 versions that predate the bump to 4.7.2 and addition of --enable-libstdcxx-time, specifically: $ g++-mp-4.7 --version g++-mp-4.

<    1   2