http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54708
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab 2012-09-26 07:19:41
UTC ---
Library arguments are position dependent, and must always be placed after the
objects that reference them.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54713
Bug #: 54713
Summary: [4.8 Regression] error: non-trivial conversion at
assignment in gcc.c-torture/compile/pr53410-2.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54705
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54714
Bug #: 54714
Summary: ICE on invalid expression involving DT with
allocatable components and constructor in I/O
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54713
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #1 from Ri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54712
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mingw32
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini 2012-09-26
09:00:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 28279
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28279
Draft, sanity checked x86_64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
--- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini 2012-09-26
09:01:58 UTC ---
Kai, I attached a complete draft which passes a sanity check on Linux. Please
let me know if it works for you and we can resolve this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54711
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-26
09:03:01 UTC ---
RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/\{-m32,\}"
works for me as well. You say the elaborated list needs fixing? Care to
fix it yourself?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54704
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54710
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54714
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i686-pc-linux-gnu
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54713
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54709
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54709
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-26
10:10:42 UTC ---
Turns out the location changes broke streamer_handle_as_builtin_p (which
uses broken predicates). Testing
Index: tree-streamer.h
=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Kretz 2012-09-26 10:52:38
UTC ---
Thanks for the quick response! You guys are cool! :)
The pattern here is for calculation with extended precision:
xh = x & mask;
xl = x - xh;
yh = y & mask
yl = y - yh;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53137
valery.bickov+gcc at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53137
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-26
11:34:49 UTC ---
Probably wants a new bugreport, but confirmed:
(gdb) call debug_gimple_stmt (stmt)
__this.0 = __this;
and __this is
unit size
eh, a bare FIELD_DEC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54688
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54715
Bug #: 54715
Summary: !$OMP SINGLE NOWAIT gives compiler error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54709
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-26
11:56:37 UTC ---
Seems that doesn't work (yeah, the builtin defs issue ... bah). The following
might (w/o reverting the previous change):
Index: gcc/tree.h
===
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54715
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
Bug #: 54716
Summary: Select best typed instruction for bitwise operations
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54709
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-09-26 12:48:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Seems that doesn't work (yeah, the builtin defs issue ... bah). The following
> might (w/o reverting the previous change):
>
> Index: gcc/tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54713
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54708
--- Comment #4 from Hubert 2012-09-26 12:52:49 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This is not a bug as ubuntu uses --as-needed as the default.
If this is ubuntu feature we would obtain the same results using gcc-4.4,
whereas in this cas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717
Bug #: 54717
Summary: Runtime regression: polyhedron test "rnflow" degraded
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54688
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sparc64-linux |sparc64-linux,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54718
Bug #: 54718
Summary: [4.8 regression] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt, at
tree-inline.c:1468
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54718
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54718
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2012-09-26 13:06:56 UTC
---
Created attachment 28281
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28281
preprocessed input file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54709
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-26
13:11:14 UTC ---
Ok, this bug won't be fixed and I'm not sure the reduced testcase handling is
a bug. With
void * memcpy (void *, void *, long);
bar ()
{
memcpy (0, 1, 1);
}
and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54648
--- Comment #2 from Leonid Volnitsky 2012-09-26
13:16:16 UTC ---
Found bad commit.
Quick recap: GCC says that expression sizeof()==1 is not constexpr.
Commit is about template aliases and they are used in expression.
Bad com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54688
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Schmidt 2012-09-26
13:18:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> It's r191493, the transformation is applied to a %sp-based load, which is
> invalid since the frame is destroyed, and the resulting offset is bogus:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54715
--- Comment #2 from Arno M 2012-09-26 13:23:48 UTC ---
Ah that's where the mistake is coming from. Thank you for your help.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54709
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-09-26 13:28:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Ok, this bug won't be fixed and I'm not sure the reduced testcase handling is
> a bug.
It also only happens with -O0. Now -flto and -O0 are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54709
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54688
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2012-09-26
13:37:25 UTC ---
> I admit I don't quite see yet why this would be invalid (assuming that the
> stack grows from high address to low ones). What do you mean by "the frame is
> destroyed", is the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54709
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-26
13:46:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 28282
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28282
gcc48-pr54716.patch
Untested patch to optimize this.
Unfortunately it will also change g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54635
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-09-26
13:46:36 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Sep 26 13:46:29 2012
New Revision: 191761
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191761
Log:
PR middle-end/54635
* doc/tm.t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54709
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-26
13:47:02 UTC ---
Index: gcc/lto-symtab.c
===
--- gcc/lto-symtab.c(revision 191756)
+++ gcc/lto-symtab.c(working copy)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54688
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Schmidt 2012-09-26
13:50:06 UTC ---
Oh, I missed that it was a MINUS rtx. This is noncanonical RTL, it should be
(plus (sp) (negated constant)).
Does the bug persist if you fix the sparc port in this way?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54635
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54719
Bug #: 54719
Summary: Bootstrap stuck in stage1 with message "checking for
compiler with PCH support"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54718
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43550
christophe.lyon at st dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christophe.lyon at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2012-09-26 13:55:28
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created attachment 28282 [details]
> gcc48-pr54716.patch
Does this patch also fix xfail in gcc.target/i386/xorps-sse2.c?
IIRC, we generated correc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54718
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-09-26 13:58:58 UTC ---
> --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-26
> 13:54:35 UTC ---
> This means we have a stale gimple_block that is no longer contained in the
> BLOCK t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2012-09-26 14:01:13
UTC ---
Maybe also relevant: [1].
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg01546.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54688
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-09-26
14:03:24 UTC ---
> Oh, I missed that it was a MINUS rtx. This is noncanonical RTL, it should be
> (plus (sp) (negated constant)).
>
> Does the bug persist if you fix the sparc port in this way
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54688
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt 2012-09-26
14:13:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 28283
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28283
Candidate patch.
The offset range should not be an issue with the right constraints etc.; t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54709
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-26
14:14:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 28284
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28284
patch
I am testing this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-26
14:23:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Created attachment 28282 [details]
> > gcc48-pr54716.patch
>
> Does this patch also fix xfail in gcc.target/i386/xorp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54709
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28284|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54719
--- Comment #1 from Dehao Chen 2012-09-26 14:25:25
UTC ---
Hi, Dodji,
Could you help verify if this problem is solved by
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191706 ? If yes, then it
should be a duplicate of http://gcc.gnu.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54719
--- Comment #2 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-09-26 14:41:43 UTC ---
"dehao at google dot com" a écrit:
> Could you help verify if this problem is solved by
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191706 ? If yes, then it
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28282|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54711
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey 2012-09-26 15:10:21
UTC ---
Yes, RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/\{-m32,\}" works fine but
RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix --target_board=unix/-m32" does not.
It should be RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board='
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717
--- Comment #3 from Sergey Ostanevich 2012-09-26
15:11:38 UTC ---
adding -### gives (in part of options)
/export/users/syostane/pb11/gcc120914/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.8.0/f951
air.f90 "-march=corei7" -mcx16 -msahf -mno-m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54711
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerald at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423
--- Comment #15 from Dinar Temirbulatov
2012-09-26 15:38:33 UTC ---
here is command and flags to reproduce the second testcase on 4.6 and 4.7 :
cc1plus -mcpu=cortex-a15 -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=hard -ftree-vectorize -O3
cr_parse-reduced-fsf.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-26
15:40:53 UTC ---
On
#define vector __attribute__ ((vector_size (16)))
__attribute__((noinline, noclone))
vector float foo(vector float f, vector float h)
{
vector int g = { 0x8000, 0,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-26
15:41:05 UTC ---
The slowdown is mostly hidden by -fno-tree-loop-if-convert.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse 2012-09-26 15:53:00
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I haven't noticed a measurable performance difference though on Intel SNB 2600
> CPU though, so perhaps the patch isn't needed.
Ah, I assumed they ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #85 from Mikael Morin 2012-09-26
16:06:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #84)
> (In reply to comment #83)
> > any progress on this one?
>
> Well, the patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-08/msg00150.html solves
> sever
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54622
jules at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jules at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54622
--- Comment #6 from Janis Johnson 2012-09-26
16:45:25 UTC ---
It's important to continue to run the vectorization tests with ARM big-endian
to detect regressions in the execution tests, so I don't want to exclude it
from all vect effective
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54674
--- Comment #11 from William J. Schmidt
2012-09-26 16:49:45 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed Sep 26 16:49:32 2012
New Revision: 191765
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191765
Log:
2012-09-26 Bill Schmidt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54674
William J. Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694
--- Comment #4 from Toralf Förster 2012-09-26
17:18:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 28287
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28287
cc -E -v
attached the output of
n22
/var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/qemu-kvm-1.1.1-r3/work/qemu-kv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54711
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-09-26
17:53:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > I am not sure where the sources
> > for the web pages are. Are they in the GCC source tree somewhere?
> > I didn't see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54711
--- Comment #5 from Steve Ellcey 2012-09-26 18:18:05
UTC ---
OK, I can check out wwwdocs but the page I am interested in doesn't seem to be
there. On the web it is http://gcc.gnu.org/install/test.html, but I can't seem
to find this page i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54711
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2012-09-26
18:20:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> OK, I can check out wwwdocs but the page I am interested in doesn't seem to be
> there. On the web it is http://gcc.gnu.org/install/test.html, but I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54102
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54172
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54383
--- Comment #2 from 166291 at gmail dot com 2012-09-26 18:45:36 UTC ---
Some more information is that this only seems to happen when the lambda
captures variables, and it's in the global scope.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54710
--- Comment #5 from Larry Evans 2012-09-26
19:01:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> That:
>
> --enable-checking=assert,misc,tree,gc,rtl,runtime
>
> will enable very compile-time intensive internal checking. Use
> --enable-checki
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54710
Larry Evans changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28274|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54720
Bug #: 54720
Summary: libobjc install-strip target not populated
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54699
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo 2012-09-26 20:05:47
UTC ---
Hm, maybe implementing TARGET_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESS_P would help this case?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54717
--- Comment #5 from Sergey Ostanevich 2012-09-26
20:07:26 UTC ---
for 093t.pre I see the following missing in cptrf2 function, first is good,
second is degraded:
***
*** 8947,8966
goto ;
:
- pretmp_325 =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
--- Comment #14 from Kai Tietz 2012-09-26 20:09:16
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Hey P, I think you mean:
>
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/config/abi/pre/gnu.ver
> b/libstdc++-v3/config/abi/pre/g
> index 5265b21..396feec 100644
> -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54721
Bug #: 54721
Summary: Generate arm/thumb interwork veneers at compile time?
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37303
--- Comment #8 from Steve Ellcey 2012-09-26 20:33:32
UTC ---
Author: sje
Date: Wed Sep 26 20:33:28 2012
New Revision: 191772
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191772
Log:
2012-09-26 Steve Ellcey
PR c/3730
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54716
--- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak 2012-09-26 20:59:24
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > I haven't noticed a measurable performance difference though on Intel SNB
> > 2600
> > CPU though, so perhaps the patch i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54721
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm*-*-*
--- Comment #1 from An
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
--- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini 2012-09-26
21:06:28 UTC ---
Ah, Ok. Benjamin, please handle this, because I don't want to make other
mistakes here. Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54622
--- Comment #7 from Janis Johnson 2012-09-26
21:51:53 UTC ---
I've tried requiring arm_little_endian for various vect_ effective targets, but
the missing support isn't at all clear-cut. Lots of vectorization takes place
so it's important
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53476
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P5
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53476
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P5 |P1
--- Comment #6 from Steve Ell
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54711
--- Comment #7 from Steve Ellcey 2012-09-26 22:47:26
UTC ---
Author: sje
Date: Wed Sep 26 22:47:22 2012
New Revision: 191781
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191781
Log:
2012-09-26 Steve Ellcey
PR web/54
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
