[Bug middle-end/53850] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in expand_call_tm, at trans-mem.c:2289 with -fgnu-tm -O3

2012-09-25 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53850 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-09-25 18:47:40 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Tue Sep 25 18:47:35 2012 New Revision: 191742 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191742 Log: PR middle-end/53850 * trans-me

[Bug middle-end/53850] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in expand_call_tm, at trans-mem.c:2289 with -fgnu-tm -O3

2012-09-25 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53850 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/54089] [SH] Refactor shift patterns

2012-09-25 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089 --- Comment #20 from Oleg Endo 2012-09-25 19:06:34 UTC --- Author: olegendo Date: Tue Sep 25 19:06:28 2012 New Revision: 191743 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191743 Log: PR target/54089 * config/sh/con

[Bug c/46480] [trans-mem] Uninstrumented code path is missing

2012-09-25 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46480 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/54671] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc 4.7.2 -Wl,--no-ctors-in-init-array causes binutils test failure, works with 4.7.1

2012-09-25 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54671 --- Comment #4 from Pawel Sikora 2012-09-25 19:23:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > I think this is a user bug. If gcc is configured against binutils that > support > conversion of ctors into init_array, then it will assume it, obvio

[Bug middle-end/54704] [4.8 Regression] three-fold increase in compile-time between r191483 and r191569

2012-09-25 Thread dehao at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54704 Dehao Chen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dehao at google dot com --- Commen

[Bug c++/54706] -fsyntax-only suppresses a compilation error

2012-09-25 Thread dave at boostpro dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54706 --- Comment #3 from Dave Abrahams 2012-09-25 19:55:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > As already discussed in another PR, with -fsyntax-only no template > instantiation occurs. Can be that? Certainly that explains it. > In any cas

[Bug web/54711] New: Fix --target_board examples on test.html page

2012-09-25 Thread sje at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54711 Bug #: 54711 Summary: Fix --target_board examples on test.html page Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/28896] -fstack-limit-symbol and m68k and non 68020

2012-09-25 Thread baker at usgs dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896 --- Comment #42 from Larry Baker 2012-09-25 20:39:10 UTC --- Change log for patches here. The patches here implement GCC stack limit checking for Freescale ColdFire processors (bug no. 28896) and fix the issues identified in the existing GCC so

[Bug c/54708] library must be placed after source for gcc to see it

2012-09-25 Thread lestath at interia dot pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54708 --- Comment #1 from Hubert 2012-09-25 21:25:26 UTC --- System information: ubuntu 12.04

[Bug middle-end/54704] [4.8 Regression] three-fold increase in compile-time between r191483 and r191569

2012-09-25 Thread dehao at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54704 --- Comment #8 from dehao at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-25 21:32:39 UTC --- Author: dehao Date: Tue Sep 25 21:32:29 2012 New Revision: 191747 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191747 Log: libcpp: 2012-09-25 Dehao

[Bug bootstrap/53266] Error: Unrecognized opcode: `mulhwu'

2012-09-25 Thread skunk at iskunk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-09-25 21:38:32 UTC --- Okay, I'm bootstrapping an unmodified 4.7.2, using a previously-built 4.7.0 as CC and the following configuration options: --prefix=/opt/tg --disable-dependency-t

[Bug target/54703] _mm_sub_pd is incorrectly substituted with vandnps

2012-09-25 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-25 21:56:53 UTC --- Yeah, the generic code is not buggy, it seems sane to assume AND is integral/vector integer operation only, but I think i?86 isn't the only backend that uses AND on vector float

[Bug middle-end/54645] [4.8 Regression] Many testsuite failures

2012-09-25 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645 --- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-09-25 23:27:34 UTC --- Looks fixed. Maybe reporter or fixer would like to close it.

[Bug middle-end/54645] [4.8 Regression] Many testsuite failures

2012-09-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/54708] library must be placed after source for gcc to see it

2012-09-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54708 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/54650] [4.8 Regression] libgomp regression

2012-09-25 Thread dehao at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54650 Dehao Chen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/54364] Tail call jumps not threaded

2012-09-25 Thread xguo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54364 --- Comment #4 from xuepeng guo 2012-09-26 03:17:59 UTC --- Author: xguo Date: Wed Sep 26 03:17:54 2012 New Revision: 191751 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191751 Log: 2012-09-26 Zhenqiang Chen Bac

[Bug c++/54712] New: internal compiler error: in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo, at gimple-fold.c

2012-09-25 Thread alexmax2742 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54712 Bug #: 54712 Summary: internal compiler error: in gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo, at gimple-fold.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug target/53087] [powerpc] Poor code from cstore expander

2012-09-25 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53087 --- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool 2012-09-26 05:18:49 UTC --- Author: segher Date: Wed Sep 26 05:18:43 2012 New Revision: 191752 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191752 Log: gcc/ PR target/51274 PR

[Bug target/51274] Starting with GCC 4.5, powerpc generated different code for x != 0.

2012-09-25 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51274 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool 2012-09-26 05:18:49 UTC --- Author: segher Date: Wed Sep 26 05:18:43 2012 New Revision: 191752 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191752 Log: gcc/ PR target/51274 PR

[Bug target/36557] -m32 -mpowerpc64 produces better code than -m64 for a!=0

2012-09-25 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36557 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/51274] Starting with GCC 4.5, powerpc generated different code for x != 0.

2012-09-25 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51274 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug target/53087] [powerpc] Poor code from cstore expander

2012-09-25 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53087 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/53266] Error: Unrecognized opcode: `mulhwu'

2012-09-25 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266 --- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool 2012-09-26 05:49:09 UTC --- Sorry, I didn't notice this was for 4.7 -- the removal of all suport for the POWER ISA is only on mainline, and won't be backported. Could you test mainline instead? All

[Bug fortran/54618] [OOP] wrong-code with CLASS(...), INTENT(OUT) -- and OPTIONAL or ALLOCATABLE

2012-09-25 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28275|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug bootstrap/53266] Error: Unrecognized opcode: `mulhwu'

2012-09-25 Thread skunk at iskunk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266 --- Comment #8 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-09-26 06:06:11 UTC --- Sure, can do. Is mainline a synonym for SVN trunk? Is there somewhere I can download a ready-made tarball, just to make sure everything is autogen'ed correctly?

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.8 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

2012-09-25 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 --- Comment #83 from Joost VandeVondele 2012-09-26 06:42:59 UTC --- Mikael, any progress on this one (BTW, the PR is not yet assigned)? It would be great to have LTO work with Fortran in 4.8 (especially with all the inlining improvements).

[Bug bootstrap/53266] Error: Unrecognized opcode: `mulhwu'

2012-09-25 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool 2012-09-26 06:43:41 UTC --- Yes, mainline is SVN trunk. There are weekly snapshots on http://gcc.gnu.org/snapshots.html (just get the newest one, it should be more than new enough for this).

<    1   2