http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54670
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54689
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolutio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54110
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54692
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.0 |---
--- Comment #12 from Ric
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53559
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54698
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54457
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54696
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Status|UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54133
--- Comment #8 from amker.cheng 2012-09-25
07:45:02 UTC ---
I have spent some time investigating this bug and now I think I understand the
issue.
The problematic instruction patterns which save/restore argument/return
registers is gener
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53663
--- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
07:52:01 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 25 07:51:51 2012
New Revision: 191694
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191694
Log:
2012-09-25 Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53663
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
Summary|[4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54698
--- Comment #6 from Hin-Tak Leung
2012-09-25 08:07:43 UTC ---
Hmm... I still think I saw it at least twice so I stopped using -j X in my
recent runs of checking many of gcc 4.3.x-4.7.x on tru64. Does "make -k check"
try to make the languag
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
--- Comment #10 from Ruben Van Boxem
2012-09-25 08:11:23 UTC ---
I can confirm adding the exports gets rid of the undefined references.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53663
--- Comment #17 from Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
2012-09-25 08:31:25 UTC ---
With above fix 4.7.2 works as expected too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54699
Bug #: 54699
Summary: [4.8 Regression] [SH] gfortran.dg/class_array_9.f03
ICEs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44436
--- Comment #33 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-25 08:43:53 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Sep 25 08:43:38 2012
New Revision: 191695
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191695
Log:
2012-09-25 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44436
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54700
Bug #: 54700
Summary: Optimize away x<0 as mask argument of a blend.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28215|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54606
--- Comment #3 from Troy 2012-09-25 09:13:34 UTC ---
I think more to the point, and a better mnemonic, is to say that "there are no
references in C++." What is called a reference in C++ is really just a
rename/alias for the variable. To rei
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
09:38:44 UTC ---
Including the boundary as with
/* If there is a symbol in the set that shares the same
asm name than NODE, rename NODE. */
if (!TREE_PUBL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54526
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
09:53:36 UTC ---
Indeed:
Index: gcc/lto-streamer-out.c
===
--- gcc/lto-streamer-out.c (revision 191694)
+++ gcc/lto-st
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28264|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54701
Bug #: 54701
Summary: [4.8 Regression] double_int conversion breaks avr
build
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50457
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo 2012-09-25 10:53:36
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> There is no glibc port for SH2* and highly unlikely someone will
> add it. SH2* linux uses and will use totally different environment
> instead of glibc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54701
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-09-25
10:56:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Does this still fail?
I haven't built GCC on the AIX 4.3 (PowerPC 604) system lately, but my scripts
are set up to do so using
--with-cp
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: dim...@gmail.com
gcc version 4.8.0 20120925 (experimental) [trunk revision 191688] (GCC)
$ gcc -O2 -flto -m64 -c X.i -o x.o
X.i: In function &#x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50457
--- Comment #6 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-09-25
11:33:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Does this make sense?
Sounds reasonable.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54702
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54701
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-09-25
11:41:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Fixing it would probably have been as fast as reporting this bug. Confirmed.
So are bugs invalid that are easy to fix for others?
If I fix th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool 2012-09-25
11:44:42 UTC ---
> I haven't built GCC on the AIX 4.3 (PowerPC 604) system lately, but my scripts
> are set up to do so using
>
> --with-cpu=powerpc --disable-aix64 --disable-powercpu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54701
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
11:47:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Fixing it would probably have been as fast as reporting this bug.
> > Confirmed.
>
> So are bugs invalid that are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54699
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo 2012-09-25 11:56:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Thanks for tracing this.
The mem store insn
(set (subreg:SF (mem/c:DI (reg/f:SI 14 r14)) 4)
(reg:SF 0 r0))
looks valid. The "movsf_ie" patter
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54702
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
12:01:11 UTC ---
the malloc and __builtin_malloc variant now enter symbol merging. Fixing that
doesn't fix the issue, but the following seems "correct" anyway:
Index: gcc/lto-symtab.c
===
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54701
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-09-25
12:10:52 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Sep 25 12:10:39 2012
New Revision: 191701
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191701
Log:
PR other/54701
* config/avr/av
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54702
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54692
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-25
12:27:53 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 25 12:27:47 2012
New Revision: 191702
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191702
Log:
PR other/54692
* configure.ac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54676
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-25
12:46:59 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 25 12:46:54 2012
New Revision: 191703
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191703
Log:
PR tree-optimization/54676
* tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54692
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54676
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54702
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54702
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
13:08:45 UTC ---
Yeah, the tree seems to be broken in various ways :/ And as usual Honza is
lost ...
A first try with my patch restored LTO bootstrap til stage3 for me but failed
in
the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54702
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
13:16:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Created attachment 28266 [details]
> > patch
> >
> > builtins should simply not be in the assembler name hash (that fixes t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54702
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54625
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645
--- Comment #8 from dehao at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-25 13:19:39 UTC ---
Author: dehao
Date: Tue Sep 25 13:19:33 2012
New Revision: 191706
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191706
Log:
gcc:
2012-09-25 Dehao Che
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54625
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
13:23:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 28267
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28267
non-working patch with testcases
Confirmed. Non-working patch (from PR54702) with all t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54625
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
13:28:13 UTC ---
The testcases are also fixed by
Index: gcc/lto-symtab.c
===
--- gcc/lto-symtab.c(revision 191700)
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703
Bug #: 54703
Summary: [miscompilation] _mm_sub_pd is incorrectly substituted
with vandnps
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Kretz 2012-09-25 13:32:27
UTC ---
Um, sorry. Forgot to note the compiler switches:
gcc -O1 -march=bdver1
I can't reproduce the error with corei7-avx or any other non-AVX target.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-25
13:48:10 UTC ---
Looking into it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54704
Bug #: 54704
Summary: three-fold increase in compile-time between r191483
and r191569
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54704
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
14:07:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 28268
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28268
testcase
Testcase. Needs -fpermissive, for example with -O2 -funroll-loops -ffast-math.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54704
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|bernds at gcc dot gnu.org |
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-25
14:19:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 28269
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28269
OPTIOAL: Draft patch + test case
I have attached a patch which fixes some of the issues wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54705
Bug #: 54705
Summary: Building gcc with ADA and LTO results in an internal
error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54625
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-09-25 14:24:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> The testcases are also fixed by
>
> Index: gcc/lto-symtab.c
> ===
> --- gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Targe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53918
utke at mcs dot anl.gov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||utke at mcs dot anl.gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54704
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54704
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
14:41:17 UTC ---
static hashval_t
location_adhoc_data_hash (const void *l)
{
const struct location_adhoc_data *lb =
(const struct location_adhoc_data *) l;
return (hashval_t) lb-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54526
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-25 14:44:58 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Sep 25 14:44:52 2012
New Revision: 191712
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191712
Log:
/cp
2012-09-25 Paolo Carlin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54526
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53918
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54706
Bug #: 54706
Summary: -fsyntax-only suppresses a compilation error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54704
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
14:57:58 UTC ---
With the hash function fixed
Index: libcpp/line-map.c
===
--- libcpp/line-map.c (revision 191706)
+++ li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54704
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54625
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
15:06:25 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 25 15:06:17 2012
New Revision: 191713
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191713
Log:
2012-09-25 Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54625
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54707
Bug #: 54707
Summary: picochip.c:332:985: error:
‘default_stabs_asm_out_constructor’ was not declared
in this scope
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694
--- Comment #2 from Toralf Förster 2012-09-25
15:26:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 28271
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28271
cc -E
n22 ~ # gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.6.3/gcc
CO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54706
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54706
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-09-25
15:53:24 UTC ---
See PR52964
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54708
Bug #: 54708
Summary: library must be placed after source for gcc to see it
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54641
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-09-25
16:02:26 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Sep 25 16:02:20 2012
New Revision: 191714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191714
Log:
PR target/54641
* config/avr/t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54709
Bug #: 54709
Summary: [4.8 Regression] r191713 breaks Firefox build
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423
--- Comment #12 from Dinar Temirbulatov
2012-09-25 16:12:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 28273
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28273
testcase for gcc-4.6 and gcc-4.7
Here is another testcase for gcc-4.6 and gcc-4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423
--- Comment #13 from Dinar Temirbulatov
2012-09-25 16:14:44 UTC ---
This time it is "arm_zero_extendqisi2_v6" pattern
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49430
Dinar Temirbulatov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dtemirbulatov at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49430
--- Comment #10 from Dinar Temirbulatov
2012-09-25 16:16:55 UTC ---
oh, sorry please ignore my comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423
--- Comment #14 from Dinar Temirbulatov
2012-09-25 16:18:05 UTC ---
(gdb) call debug_rtx(insn)
(insn:TI 454 460 607 (set (reg:SI 2 r2 [orig:433 buf+2 ] [433])
(zero_extend:SI (mem/u/c/i:QI (symbol_ref/u:SI ("*.LC0") [flags 0x2])
[
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54701
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-09-25
16:19:51 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Sep 25 16:19:43 2012
New Revision: 191716
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191716
Log:
PR other/54701
* config/avr/av
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54701
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54641
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54710
Bug #: 54710
Summary: moderately large tuple, with many gets, ballons
compile time
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45508
gellert at dkrz dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gellert at dkrz dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53067
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54710
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54710
--- Comment #2 from Larry Evans 2012-09-25
17:15:29 UTC ---
The gcc compiler was downloaded from:
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20120624/gcc-4.8-20120624.tar.bz2
it was configured with the shell script:
#!/bin/bash
this_d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54710
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-09-25
17:25:48 UTC ---
Well, if we are interested in the normal user experience, I guess we should
also time with --disable-checking. Not that I think it will make a big
difference..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2012-09-25
18:04:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created attachment 28270 [details]
> gcc48-pr54703.patch
Since I wrote the code which breaks this, this looks good. The only question I
have is w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-25
18:37:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 28275
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28275
Patch for OPTIONAL
This patch fixes the segfaults of the test case in attachment 28269. It
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #41 from Larry Baker 2012-09-25 18:43:05
UTC ---
Created attachment 28276
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28276
Build patched GNU GCC 4.8.0 experimental for ColdFire uClinux
Notes to download, patch, and
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
