http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54518
--- Comment #1 from thierry.visonneau at cea dot fr 2012-09-07 12:36:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 28148
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28148
test.list
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54518
--- Comment #2 from thierry.visonneau at cea dot fr 2012-09-07 12:37:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 28149
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28149
titi.g++440-O2.s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54518
--- Comment #3 from thierry.visonneau at cea dot fr 2012-09-07 12:38:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 28150
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28150
titi.g++450-O2.s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53922
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-07
13:04:42 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Sep 7 13:04:38 2012
New Revision: 191072
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191072
Log:
2012-09-07 Richard Guenther
Backport f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53922
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.2
Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-07
13:05:22 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Sep 7 13:05:18 2012
New Revision: 191073
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191073
Log:
2012-09-07 Richard Guenther
Backport
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54504
--- Comment #10 from progmei 2012-09-07 13:30:13 UTC
---
It's OK now. And I just have some qusetions.
If I can build the cross compiler support both soft/hard float big/little
endian? And how to compile this.
where can I get the related document
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54487
--- Comment #15 from tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-07 13:49:54 UTC ---
Author: tejohnson
Date: Fri Sep 7 13:49:47 2012
New Revision: 191074
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191074
Log:
This fixes part of the issue desc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #51 from Jack Howarth 2012-09-07
13:50:08 UTC ---
Final patch, hopefully, posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00465.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54504
--- Comment #11 from progmei 2012-09-07 14:16:15 UTC
---
It's OK now. And I just have some qusetions.
If I can build the cross compiler support both soft/hard float big/little
endian, and how to compile it.
where can I get the related document on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54519
Bug #: 54519
Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Debug info quality regression
due to (pointless) partial inlining
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54518
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54515
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-09-07 15:23:04 UTC ---
The following patch fixes the issue for me:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-sra.c b/gcc/tree-sra.c
index aafaa15..2bb92e9 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-sra.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-sra.c
@@ -984,7 +984,8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54184
--- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-09-07
16:00:18 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Fri Sep 7 16:00:07 2012
New Revision: 191079
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191079
Log:
PR testsuite/54184
* gcc.dg/pr52558-1.c: D
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54514
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54184
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
--- Comment #16 from stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com 2012-09-07 19:07:27 UTC ---
> Any progress on the "real" solution? If not, can you install the branch fix
> on
> trunk? Thx.
I think I already mentioned before that the branch fix is the only
r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54149
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54520
Bug #: 54520
Summary: ice in merge_latch_edges with -O3
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54520
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54208
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin 2012-09-07
20:37:45 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Fri Sep 7 20:37:41 2012
New Revision: 191083
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191083
Log:
fortran/
PR fortran/54208
* simplify.c (sim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54521
Bug #: 54521
Summary: g++ fails to call explicit constructors in the second
step of copy initialization
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54520
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54522
Bug #: 54522
Summary: Using "g77 -O -fno-automatic", reassignment of a
variable in an if statement in a function triggers a
compiler bug.
Classification: Unclassified
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325
drtwox at tpg dot com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drtwox at tpg dot com.au
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54522
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-09-07
21:40:04 UTC ---
g77 is no longer supported. It is over 6 years old now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54516
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54516
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.2 |4.8.0
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54514
Clive Page changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54521
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54506
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54523
Bug #: 54523
Summary: srand() initializing seed for random() function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #52 from Jack Howarth 2012-09-08
00:25:38 UTC ---
Regression test results as
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-09/msg00623.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54520
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
101 - 136 of 136 matches
Mail list logo