http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54146
--- Comment #43 from Jan Hubicka 2012-08-10
07:52:31 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Aug 10 07:52:23 2012
New Revision: 190283
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190283
Log:
PR middle-end/54146
* ipa-inline-transfor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423
--- Comment #26 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-10 08:08:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> Christian, do you have anything to add regarding this matter?
>
> I'm not sure whether this should be back ported to 4.6.x or 4.7.x or not.
> K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54208
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-10 08:31:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Anyway, the following patchlet gets rid of the error, but may possibly
> introduce regressions (unchecked):
It fails with an ICE on:
* interface_1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54027
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-08-10
08:34:01 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Aug 10 08:33:57 2012
New Revision: 190286
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190286
Log:
2012-08-10 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54218
Bug #: 54218
Summary: Debug info for function parameters is incorrect when
compiled with -O0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54027
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54218
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-debug
Status|UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54208
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53533
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53204
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51233
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54218
--- Comment #2 from Senthil Kumar Selvaraj 2012-08-10 10:23:55 UTC ---
Comment on attachment 27980
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27980
Failing dejagnu test case
>/* { dg-do run } */
>/* { dg-options "-g" } */
>/* { dg-skip-i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54218
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27980|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54218
--- Comment #4 from Senthil Kumar Selvaraj 2012-08-10 10:39:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> That's because the actual parameter value is not used:
>
> func (int p)
> {
> ;; basic block 2, loop depth 0
> ;;pred: ENTRY
> p_1 = 0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54219
Bug #: 54219
Summary: __builtin_shuffle mask reversed
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54219
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54219
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54109
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-08-10
12:00:11 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Aug 10 12:00:05 2012
New Revision: 190291
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190291
Log:
2012-08-10 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54109
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54211
--- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt 2012-08-10
12:16:11 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Aug 10 12:16:04 2012
New Revision: 190294
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190294
Log:
gcc:
2012-08-10 Bill Schmidt
PR mi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54211
William J. Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54211
William J. Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423
--- Comment #27 from Oleg Endo 2012-08-10
12:26:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
>
> I got an ICE in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3654 when applying to
> the 4.7 branch, but it seems to be resolved on trunk (hoping it's not hidden
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54182
wbrana changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-fPIE -pie shouldn't|-fvisibility=hidden
|disable -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54220
Bug #: 54220
Summary: [avr] Potential stack corruption in naked functions at
-O0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221
Bug #: 54221
Summary: Explicit private access specifier signals "unexpected
defined but not used [-Wunused-function]" warning
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423
Ryan Mansfield changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rmansfield at qnx dot com
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423
--- Comment #29 from Oleg Endo 2012-08-10
13:26:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #28)
>
> This ICE does happen on trunk (rev190294). I have a testcase for it that I'm
> reducing. There was a second ICE introduced by 190259 as well.
>
> /home/ry
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49443
--- Comment #7 from Ulrich Weigand 2012-08-10
13:26:51 UTC ---
Author: uweigand
Date: Fri Aug 10 13:26:44 2012
New Revision: 190296
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190296
Log:
ChangeLog:
Backport from mainline
2012
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54182
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54219
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-08-10
13:35:40 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Aug 10 13:35:34 2012
New Revision: 190297
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190297
Log:
2012-08-10 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54219
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54219
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423
--- Comment #30 from Ryan Mansfield 2012-08-10
13:36:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 27983
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27983
preprocessed src
Testcase that reproduces elimination_costs_in_insn ICE with -m4 -O2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54182
--- Comment #8 from wbrana 2012-08-10 13:40:29 UTC ---
int func() {
return random();
}
int main(){
return func();
}
$ gcc-4.7.2 -O2 1.c -o 1
$ nm -CD ./1
w __gmon_start__
U __libc_start_main
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54182
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54182
--- Comment #10 from wbrana 2012-08-10 13:49:19 UTC
---
How can I tell linker to not export symbols?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222
Bug #: 54222
Summary: [avr] Implement fixed-point support
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180
Denis Kolesnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54200
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-08-10
14:18:51 UTC ---
Guality test that fails:
/* PR tree-optimization/54200 */
/* { dg-do run } */
/* { dg-options "-g -fno-var-tracking-assignments" } */
int o __attribute__((used));
void bar (void)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54223
Bug #: 54223
Summary: Statement function statement with dummy arguments that
are also OPTIONAL may crash in wrong calls
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-08-10
14:24:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 27984
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27984
Tentative patch against 4.8
libgcc/
* config/avr/lib1funcs-fixed.S: New file.
* config/av
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089
--- Comment #10 from Ryan Mansfield 2012-08-10
14:24:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 27985
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27985
preprocessed src
./xgcc -B. -w ~/ice2.i -c -Os
/home/ryan/ice2.i: In function 'tg_extent':
/home
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53942
Igor Zamyatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54205
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54212
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-*-*eabi
Status|UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54212
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2012-08-10
14:58:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> shows up on 4.7 branch but latent on trunk.This has been marked predicable
> ever
> since the port was submitted and this is just broken.
>
> None o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54180
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-08-10
15:04:10 UTC ---
Also, you declare SQL_date_begin[10] then fill it with 11 characters
(-MM-DD plus the numm terminator) and do the same with SQL_date_end
This is horrible, horrible code and sho
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54172
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #137 from Jan Hubicka 2012-08-10
15:06:51 UTC ---
So since the last report we managed to double WPA memory usage and compile
time...
12m wall, 42m user is needed for WPA build.
Execution times (seconds)
phase opt and generate : 97.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #138 from Jan Hubicka 2012-08-10
15:35:44 UTC ---
Actually not, I looked up wrong report. The last report in comment #121 shows:
TOTAL : 616.4322.26 651.79
2165706 kB
So we actually go
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089
--- Comment #11 from Oleg Endo 2012-08-10
15:40:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Created attachment 27985 [details]
> preprocessed src
>
> ./xgcc -B. -w ~/ice2.i -c -Os
> /home/ryan/ice2.i: In function 'tg_extent':
> /home/ryan/ice2.i:81
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224
Bug #: 54224
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Bogus -Wunused-function warning with
static function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54182
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-08-10
16:53:54 UTC ---
You can use a linker version script.
http://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/ld/VERSION.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54225
Bug #: 54225
Summary: fortran compiler segfault processing ' print *, A(1,*)
'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54182
--- Comment #12 from wbrana 2012-08-10 17:27:02 UTC
---
Created attachment 27986
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27986
bash compiled with -fPIE -pie -fvisibility=hidden
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54182
--- Comment #13 from wbrana 2012-08-10 17:29:15 UTC
---
Created attachment 27987
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27987
bash compiled with -fPIE -pie
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54182
wbrana changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54182
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54182
wbrana changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54225
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54223
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54225
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.4
Summary|fortran compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54128
--- Comment #6 from Steve Ellcey 2012-08-10 20:10:56
UTC ---
It looks like the code generation is going different (between -g and no -g)
during the IRA/reload phase. With the cut down test case and using -O2 -g
the x.i.195r.reload file (for debu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54182
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-08-11
00:02:03 UTC ---
If it does what you need then use it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54142
--- Comment #7 from Gary Funck 2012-08-11 01:24:37
UTC ---
We're still running into this build failure on PPC64, using a recent revision
of the HEAD version. Is there additional information that is needed to help
track down the cause of the buil
I have a biz worth 25 M USD, Email me at
lwang1...@yahoo.com.cn for more information
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20020
--- Comment #14 from Gary Funck 2012-08-11 03:22:34
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Is this bug obsolete now?
Comment #7 (2005-06-25) states that this is a valid bug, and near as I can tell
the current compiler still does not target 16-byte
72 matches
Mail list logo
