[Bug c++/54111] New: function return type template deduction

2012-07-28 Thread leonid at volnitsky dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54111 Bug #: 54111 Summary: function return type template deduction Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug libstdc++/54112] New: including complex.h and complex fails in C++03

2012-07-28 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54112 Bug #: 54112 Summary: including complex.h and complex fails in C++03 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.8 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

2012-07-28 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 --- Comment #69 from Mikael Morin 2012-07-28 09:46:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #63) > With a (seemingly) unrelated patch (attached to PR52097) I'm back on ICEing > for the gfortran.dg/lto/pr45586*.f90 testcases ... > > Even before the adjust

[Bug libstdc++/54112] including complex.h and complex fails in C++03

2012-07-28 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54112 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2012-07-28 10:11:04 UTC --- Why it happens only in C++03 mode? I'm asking because if the issue isn't a regression and we are sure that it doesn't happen in C++11 mode, I don't think it can be considered high prio

[Bug libstdc++/54112] including complex.h and complex fails in C++03

2012-07-28 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54112 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2012-07-28 10:26:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Why it happens only in C++03 mode? Because the complex.h wrapper distributed with libstdc++ does: #ifdef __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__ # include #else # if _GL

[Bug libstdc++/54112] including complex.h and complex fails in C++03

2012-07-28 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54112 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-07-28 10:50:15 UTC --- Sure, sure. I'm still thinking that unless we have a regression, the less we do for C++03 mode, the better. But if you can already see simple enough fixes for both issues you are welco

[Bug c/54088] ICE at dwarf2out.c:20632 with -O1 -g

2012-07-28 Thread jengelh at medozas dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54088 --- Comment #2 from Jan Engelhardt 2012-07-28 12:09:24 UTC --- Created attachment 27883 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27883 Full preprocessed output Thanks for reminding me about the standard procedure :) The minimal comma

[Bug c/54088] ICE at dwarf2out.c:20632 with -O1 -g

2012-07-28 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54088 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/54104] Parser error for lambda expression if function template has default parameter.

2012-07-28 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54104 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53624] GCC rejects function local types in template function with default template arguments

2012-07-28 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53624 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||likan_999.student at sina

[Bug c++/53624] GCC rejects function local types in template function with default template arguments

2012-07-28 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53624 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/54113] New: -Wmissing-prototypes cries wolf for C99 inline functions

2012-07-28 Thread eggert at gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54113 Bug #: 54113 Summary: -Wmissing-prototypes cries wolf for C99 inline functions Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/54109] [4.8 Regression] ICE at tree-ssa-structalias.c:3049 in get_constraint_for_component_ref

2012-07-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54109 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/54114] New: variable-tracking performance regression from 4.8-20120610 to 4.8-20120701

2012-07-28 Thread jimis at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54114 Bug #: 54114 Summary: variable-tracking performance regression from 4.8-20120610 to 4.8-20120701 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UN

[Bug c/54088] ICE at dwarf2out.c:20632 with -O1 -g

2012-07-28 Thread jengelh at medozas dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54088 --- Comment #4 from Jan Engelhardt 2012-07-28 19:42:50 UTC --- Created attachment 27884 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27884 somewhat reduced testcase it's not a minimal one, but still lost a good deal of lines.

[Bug middle-end/54114] variable-tracking performance regression from 4.8-20120610 to 4.8-20120701

2012-07-28 Thread jimis at gmx dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54114 --- Comment #1 from jimis 2012-07-28 20:49:55 UTC --- Sorry guys my machine died an ugly death, so the web interface for my profiling runs is unfortunately offline. :-( From memory I remember that this regression is more than 0.5s overhead out of