http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53701
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-07-27
07:14:20 UTC ---
Unfortunately r177658 seems to be the cause of wrong-code PR53975.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075
--- Comment #21 from François Dumont 2012-07-27
07:57:59 UTC ---
I haven't touch the grow speed for the moment. I prefer to fix the reserve
Standard conformity first.
Now I can restore the 4.6 grow speed as it seems to be a relatively correct
on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54101
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-27
08:05:40 UTC ---
Yes, I was thinking the same thing, PR 53000
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54103
Bug #: 54103
Summary: ICE at gimplify.c:7790 on current trunk
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54104
Bug #: 54104
Summary: no default argument for 'XXX'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53418
--- Comment #13 from Antoine Balestrat 2012-07-27
08:51:54 UTC ---
Filed as PR54103.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54104
--- Comment #1 from likan_999.student at sina dot com 2012-07-27 09:04:49 UTC
---
The example can be further reduced to:
template
void f(const U& m) {
auto g = [] () {};
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54104
--- Comment #2 from likan_999.student at sina dot com 2012-07-27 09:06:48 UTC
---
BTW: the compiler error is
c.cpp: In function 'void f(const U&)':
c.cpp:3:15: error: no default argument for 'U'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54104
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787
--- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor 2012-07-27
09:34:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Shouldn't IPA-CP be able to do this already? It does appear to handle
> CONST_DECLs already...
Only if it finds them in the call statement itself, it relie
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54104
--- Comment #4 from likan_999.student at sina dot com 2012-07-27 09:58:50 UTC
---
@Jonathan Wakely, thanks for the fast response. Can you assign it to an
appropriate person?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54104
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-27
10:04:37 UTC ---
I already CC'd a C++ maintainer, he will assign it to himself if works on it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54104
--- Comment #6 from likan_999.student at sina dot com 2012-07-27 10:19:11 UTC
---
@Jonathan Wakely, thanks a lot :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53792
--- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-07-27 10:47:49 UTC ---
is "__attribute__((always_inline)) " not making foo to transform in foo2 in a
very early compiler's stage?
I can make getV a macro if helps: I do not like SetV due to its "not nat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54105
Bug #: 54105
Summary: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/asm-dialect-1.c (test for excess
errors) on x86_64-apple-darwin10
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54106
Bug #: 54106
Summary: OMAP3: encountered a blocking structure assignment,
occurring only on OMAP3 processors
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54106
--- Comment #1 from wohauser
2012-07-27 11:57:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 27881
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27881
Original source of the example
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
Bug #: 54107
Summary: [4.8 Regression]
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.8 Regression]|[4.8 Regression] Memory hog
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54106
--- Comment #2 from graham.stott at btinternet dot com 2012-07-27 13:18:28 UTC
---
No a GCC bug.
The source and dest needs to be correctly aligned
From: wolfgang.hauser.external at cassidian dot com
To: gcc-bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54106
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53792
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-07-27 15:06:31
UTC ---
On 07/27/2012 06:47 AM, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote:
> is "__attribute__((always_inline)) " not making foo to transform in foo2 in a
> very early compiler's stage?
Fairly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54088
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53773
--- Comment #4 from William J. Schmidt 2012-07-27
16:26:47 UTC ---
Operand swapping is also done in vect_is_slp_reduction.
Places that rely on the reduction operand being the last operand:
* vect_model_reduction_cost
* vectorizable_reduction
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52278
Wouter van Gulik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wvangulik at xs4all dot nl
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-27 17:36:30
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Fri Jul 27 17:36:20 2012
New Revision: 189917
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189917
Log:
PR target/54089
* config/sh/sh.c (shiftcosts
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34548
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53974
--- Comment #11 from John David Anglin 2012-07-27
18:16:46 UTC ---
Adding early clobbers to the various 32-bit DImode patterns in pa.md
didn't make any difference.
The bug appears to have been introduced in revision 188786. The
following four f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53974
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53823
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2012-07-27
18:19:26 UTC ---
*** Bug 53974 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075
--- Comment #22 from Dennis Lubert 2012-07-27
19:20:54 UTC ---
Am on vacation so I don't have the testcase at hand, but it is the same as
likan posted in the original bugreport, minus the reserve. The main difference
is that without reserve I see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46453
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43902
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54108
Bug #: 54108
Summary: 35% bigger binary
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54109
Bug #: 54109
Summary: ICE at tree-ssa-structalias.c:3049 in
get_constraint_for_component_ref
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54104
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski 2012-07-27
23:35:00 UTC ---
Related to PR 53624 .
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54093
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra 2012-07-28 00:04:15
UTC ---
Author: amodra
Date: Sat Jul 28 00:04:10 2012
New Revision: 189921
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189921
Log:
PR target/54093
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54093
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54110
Bug #: 54110
Summary: lower-subreg related code quality for long long
function return
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54078
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse 2012-07-28 06:47:49
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> without -flto 106856 bytes
> with -flto 156312 bytes
But is it faster?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54078
--- Comment #4 from wbrana 2012-07-28 06:54:06 UTC ---
one of tests is faster
42 matches
Mail list logo
