http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-07-22
07:06:47 UTC ---
-fprofile-dir= is already implemented.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher 2012-07-22
10:23:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > A tool to merge multiple gcda files shoulnd't be very difficult to write. I
> > don't think this should be done by the compile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618
--- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher 2012-07-22
10:46:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> We have one internally at Cavium which is designed to run afterwards and merge
> a few gcda file. It is designed for how we run multi-core programs and wr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43716
--- Comment #39 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-07-22 10:47:42 UTC ---
> If I compile with -fno-tree-loop-if-convert the exception occurs
> somewhere else:
It occurs in s00018 in the loop between lines 3782 to 3796
DO j = 1 , n1
dt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54055
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54066
Bug #: 54066
Summary: wrong-code at -O0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11261
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22553
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #25 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53961
--- Comment #17 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-22 15:44:55 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Jul 22 15:44:51 2012
New Revision: 189756
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189756
Log:
PR target/53961
* config/i386/i386.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24815
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sh-elf |sh*-*-*
Last reconfirmed|2006-04-24 22:37:4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270
--- Comment #36 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-22
16:46:07 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Sun Jul 22 16:46:02 2012
New Revision: 189758
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189758
Log:
PR libstdc++/53270
* acinclude.m4 (GLIBCX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53949
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-22 16:47:44
UTC ---
If I understand correctly PR 29961 is somewhat related to this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54067
Bug #: 54067
Summary: arm-none-eabi with -mapcs and attribute((interrupt))
generates wrong stack alignment
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53881
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman 2012-07-22
19:01:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 27854
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27854
C source code
Flag -O2 required. The compiler said
ui.c:7157:1: internal compiler error: in emit_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53881
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54066
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54033
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53881
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-07-22 20:18:55 UTC ---
markus@x4 tmp % < test.i
int a,b,c;
void
fn1 ()
{
switch (a)
{
case 0:
case 10:
b=c;
out_bcon:
break;
case 3:
goto out_bcon;
}
}
markus@x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53881
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #10 from Steven Bossche
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54022
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53881
--- Comment #11 from Steven Bosscher 2012-07-22
21:29:42 UTC ---
*** Bug 54022 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54068
Bug #: 54068
Summary: Compiler passes wrong argument to function when using
-O3 and inline
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33135
--- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-22 23:44:49
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sun Jul 22 23:44:45 2012
New Revision: 189761
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189761
Log:
PR target/33135
* config/sh/sh.opt (mieee):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54068
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
Summary|Compiler pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33135
--- Comment #10 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-22
23:50:00 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sun Jul 22 23:49:56 2012
New Revision: 189762
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189762
Log:
PR target/33135
* config/sh/sh.opt (mieee):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33135
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54063
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53238
--- Comment #19 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-07-23
04:20:33 UTC ---
The good news: The build gets past all of the pthreads-related errors described
here, so I think those two changes may be a workable solution.
The bad news: I'll still running up
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
--- Comment #14 from Conrad 2012-07-23
05:25:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Fixed.
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53986
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-23 06:29:51 UTC ---
> Btw, if the switch is not converted to a bit-test the path to link_error is
> also not removed by vrp, because it doesn't handle anti-ranges for switches
submitted patch fo
31 matches
Mail list logo