[Bug target/54061] [4.8 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/mipscop-*.c ICEs with -g

2012-07-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54061 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.8 Regression]|[4.8 Regression] |gcc.c

[Bug libffi/53014] [4.8 Regression] libffi failures on mips64-linux-gnu with soft-float

2012-07-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53014 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-07-21 07:06:19 UTC --- This still happens as of today.

[Bug fortran/54035] [OOP] TBP wrongly binds to a generic name if the specific name is the same

2012-07-21 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54035 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/54035] [OOP] TBP wrongly binds to a generic name if the specific name is the same

2012-07-21 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54035 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-21 09:35:49 UTC --- The problem is really that we have only one symbol for the specific and generic procedure.

[Bug fortran/42418] PROCEDURE: Rejects interface which is both specific and generic procedure

2012-07-21 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42418 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-21 09:51:57 UTC --- The error in comment #0 should be fixable by something like the following: Index: gcc/fortran/decl.c === ---

[Bug tree-optimization/43716] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Revision 158105 miscompiles doduc.f90

2012-07-21 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43716 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug fortran/54034] [4.8 Regression] doduc benchmark from polyhedron 11 segfaults

2012-07-21 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54034 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/43716] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Revision 158105 miscompiles doduc.f90

2012-07-21 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43716 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Comment #31 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/43716] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Revision 158105 miscompiles doduc.f90

2012-07-21 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43716 --- Comment #32 from Uros Bizjak 2012-07-21 10:49:31 UTC --- gcc version 4.8.0 20120720 (experimental) [trunk revision 189718] (GCC) ==2822== Memcheck, a memory error detector ==2822== Copyright (C) 2002-2011, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et

[Bug c++/54056] Fast run out of memory compiling template specialization

2012-07-21 Thread sergey.prokhorenko at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54056 --- Comment #1 from Sergey Prokhorenko 2012-07-21 10:58:04 UTC --- I also asked few people to test, this could be reproduced on: g++ (GCC) 4.7.0 20120507 (Red Hat 4.7.0-5) g++-mp-4.6 (MacPorts gcc46 4.6.3_3) 4.6.3 g++-mp-4.7 (MacPorts gcc47 4.7.1

[Bug target/54062] New: extraneous move due to register allocation issue on x86_64

2012-07-21 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54062 Bug #: 54062 Summary: extraneous move due to register allocation issue on x86_64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/48820] TR 29113: Implement parts needed for MPI 3

2012-07-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820 --- Comment #18 from Tobias Burnus 2012-07-21 11:02:56 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sat Jul 21 11:02:47 2012 New Revision: 189743 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189743 Log: 2012-07-21 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/4

[Bug tree-optimization/43716] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Revision 158105 miscompiles doduc.f90

2012-07-21 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43716 --- Comment #33 from Uros Bizjak 2012-07-21 11:31:18 UTC --- The NaN is generated as a mask for DFmode ABS_EXPR: (insn 124 123 125 (set (reg:V2DF 508) (mem/u/c:V2DF (symbol_ref/u:DI ("*.LC13") [flags 0x2]) [5 S16 A128])) doduc.f90:5376 -

[Bug target/54063] New: [4.8 regression] on powerpc64 gcc 4.8 generates larger code for global variable accesses than gcc 4.7

2012-07-21 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54063 Bug #: 54063 Summary: [4.8 regression] on powerpc64 gcc 4.8 generates larger code for global variable accesses than gcc 4.7 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8

[Bug tree-optimization/43716] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Revision 158105 miscompiles doduc.f90

2012-07-21 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43716 --- Comment #34 from Uros Bizjak 2012-07-21 12:16:42 UTC --- Maybe no problem with gcc at all: Compile doduc.f90 with -g -O3 -ffast-math -ffpe-trap=invalid Starting program: /home/uros/pb11/lin/source/a.out MAIN : FIN S2 MAIN : FIN S

[Bug tree-optimization/43716] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Revision 158105 miscompiles doduc.f90

2012-07-21 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43716 --- Comment #35 from Uros Bizjak 2012-07-21 12:35:17 UTC --- Actually, exception happens at: Starting program: /home/uros/pb11/lin/source/a.out MAIN : FIN S2 MAIN : FIN S1 MAIN : FIN S00011 MAIN : FIN S00022 Program received signal

[Bug tree-optimization/43716] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Revision 158105 miscompiles doduc.f90

2012-07-21 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43716 --- Comment #36 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-07-21 13:40:09 UTC --- > To me, it looks like invalid test. Any fortraners here to share their opinion? Please read comments #23 and #24. One problem with NaN is that they propagate until something

[Bug tree-optimization/43716] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Revision 158105 miscompiles doduc.f90

2012-07-21 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43716 --- Comment #37 from Uros Bizjak 2012-07-21 13:51:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #36) > > To me, it looks like invalid test. Any fortraners here to share their > > opinion? > > Please read comments #23 and #24. One problem with NaN is that the

[Bug c++/54055] spurious(?) "invalid use of incomplete type" warning in template definition

2012-07-21 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54055 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2012-07-21 14:11:11 UTC --- Yes, it was intentional, based on the discussion mentioned in the other comments. I made it a pedwarn rather than a hard error so that affected code would continue to compile.

[Bug fortran/39288] Bind(C): C_LOC of character substrings (F2003 erratum, pending)

2012-07-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39288 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/39288] Bind(C): C_LOC of character substrings (F2003 erratum, pending)

2012-07-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39288 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |NEW --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 20

[Bug tree-optimization/43716] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Revision 158105 miscompiles doduc.f90

2012-07-21 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43716 --- Comment #38 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-07-21 14:43:10 UTC --- > No, the first NaN was born exactly at this instruction. Please note 0 / 0 > which is the definition of NaN. AFAIU the loop around line 1852, the only possibility for 0/0 is

[Bug libstdc++/54064] New: C++11 unordered_map emplace

2012-07-21 Thread martin.alex32 at hotmail dot fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54064 Bug #: 54064 Summary: C++11 unordered_map emplace Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/54064] C++11 unordered_map emplace

2012-07-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54064 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-21 17:09:03 UTC --- See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#2006

[Bug fortran/42418] PROCEDURE: Rejects interface which is both specific and generic procedure

2012-07-21 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42418 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-21 17:10:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > However, I wonder whether this whole generic check does not come to early. If > the generic interface is declared after the PROCEDURE statement, it

[Bug libstdc++/54064] C++11 unordered_map emplace

2012-07-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54064 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/53561] [c++0x] regex_replace is missing overloads

2012-07-21 Thread vallentin at icir dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53561 Matthias Vallentin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vallentin at icir dot org --- Commen

[Bug libstdc++/53561] [c++0x] regex_replace is missing overloads

2012-07-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53561 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-21 18:00:16 UTC --- When someone contributes an implementation of it.

[Bug target/54063] [4.8 regression] on powerpc64 gcc 4.8 generates larger code for global variable accesses than gcc 4.7

2012-07-21 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54063 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/53633] __attribute__((naked)) should disable -Wreturn-type

2012-07-21 Thread sandra at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53633 Sandra Loosemore changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at codesourcery dot

[Bug c++/54058] Injected friend functions are not considered when using contextual type info to take a function address

2012-07-21 Thread andy.m.jost at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54058 --- Comment #2 from Andy Jost 2012-07-21 21:45:30 UTC --- I think you're right. Section 14.6.5.2 of the 2nd ed. (2003-10-15) has a footnote in section 14.6.5.2. It reads: 131) Friend declarations do not introduce new names into any scope, eithe

[Bug c++/54058] Injected friend functions are not considered when using contextual type info to take a function address

2012-07-21 Thread andy.m.jost at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54058 Andy Jost changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug gcov-profile/35591] value profiling tuning

2012-07-21 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35591 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/35590] Value profiling: string op -- requires power of 2 value??

2012-07-21 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35590 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/35543] Add more strOp for value profiling

2012-07-21 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35543 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/27453] gcov opens files with O_RDWR

2012-07-21 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27453 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug gcov-profile/28441] Need atomic increment of gcov counters for MP programs

2012-07-21 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28441 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug gcov-profile/32543] Gcov: profile.c total_num_edges_instrumented never incremented (patch included)

2012-07-21 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32543 --- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher 2012-07-21 23:37:05 UTC --- Author: steven Date: Sat Jul 21 23:37:02 2012 New Revision: 189748 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189748 Log: PR gcov-profile/32543 * profile.c (branc

[Bug gcov-profile/32543] Gcov: profile.c total_num_edges_instrumented never incremented (patch included)

2012-07-21 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32543 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug gcov-profile/47618] Collecting multiple profiles and using all for PGO

2012-07-21 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/47793] Relative path in fprofile-use turns into absolute path

2012-07-21 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47793 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug gcov-profile/49340] read_couts_file() not called for -fbranch-probabilities

2012-07-21 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49340 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/50631] g++.dg/bprob/g++-bprob-2.C -fbranch-probabilities FAILs on Tru64 UNIX

2012-07-21 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50631 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/51975] ICE in gcc in convert_move, at expr.c:326 with fprofile-use when source changes from fprofile-generate

2012-07-21 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51975 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/53915] gcov can call format_gcov with top > bottom, which is unexpected and gives 99.99%

2012-07-21 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53915 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug gcov-profile/53546] gcc ICEs when using -fripa at varpool.c:45

2012-07-21 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53546 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug gcov-profile/48361] gcov freezes when using --all-blocks (-a) flag.

2012-07-21 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48361 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/47618] Collecting multiple profiles and using all for PGO

2012-07-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-07-22 00:42:28 UTC --- We have one internally at Cavium which is designed to run afterwards and merge a few gcda file. It is designed for how we run multi-core programs and write a gcda file for each run.

[Bug target/54065] New: [SH] Prefer @(R0,Rn) addressing for floating-point load/store

2012-07-21 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54065 Bug #: 54065 Summary: [SH] Prefer @(R0,Rn) addressing for floating-point load/store Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/47618] Collecting multiple profiles and using all for PGO

2012-07-21 Thread xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618 xunxun changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xunxun1982 at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from