http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49265
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53961
Bug #: 53961
Summary: internal compiler error: in memory_address_length, at
config/i386/i386.c:23341
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-12-10 05:44:21 |2012-07-14
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53956
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-14 13:01:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Plus, I'm not
> sure why the error only occurs with the PROCEDURE statement.
Regarding the test case in comment #1, the difference between the c2-a
PR c++/53919
* doc/install.texi (Installing GCC): Refer to instructions for
released versions. Fix hyphenation.
Whether or not we want the release-specific installation instructions
online, I don't think it hurts to point out that the docs at
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/ ref
Please ignore, sent to the wrong list
On 14 July 2012 14:45, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> PR c++/53919
> * doc/install.texi (Installing GCC): Refer to instructions for
> released versions. Fix hyphenation.
>
> Whether or not we want the release-specific installation instruction
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53919
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-14
13:50:08 UTC ---
Suggested patch to install.texi:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-07/msg00549.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53962
Bug #: 53962
Summary: Tab handling with formatted stream output
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53961
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53961
--- Comment #2 from wbrana 2012-07-14 15:14:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 27788
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27788
source code
/usr/bin/gcc: file format elf32-x86-64
gcc -m64 -O2 -c ./host_ppc_isel.i -o test.o
In file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652
--- Comment #12 from David Stone 2012-07-14
15:14:13 UTC ---
However, I think it's important to note that they implement the very noisy
behavior of warning for all implicit fall-through. We could make our warning
much more useful by being silent f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51758
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin 2012-07-14
15:24:17 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Sat Jul 14 15:24:12 2012
New Revision: 189480
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189480
Log:
2012-07-14 Mikael Morin
Backport from trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53963
Bug #: 53963
Summary: [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with
bootstrap-profiled
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51758
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Version|4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53964
Bug #: 53964
Summary: regression: sparc64 FreeBSD:
/usr/ports/lang/gcc46/work/build/./prev-gcc/include/st
ddef.h:150:26: error: two or more data types n
declaration
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53963
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2012-07-14 16:46:56
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> On Linux/x86-64, revision 189467 failed to profiledbootstrap:
>
> checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in
> `/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-te
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53963
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-07-14 16:52:42
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> > "--prefix=/usr/local" is the key to trigger this regression.
> > The stage 3 compiler is miscompiled. Revision 189349 is OK.
>
> I don' think so. I have config
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53879
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53963
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53963
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53883
--- Comment #7 from Daryle Walker 2012-07-14
18:52:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> *-darwin8 assumes ppc64 multilib, try --disable-multilib.
I added that for my second try:
//===
cd ..
gnutar -cjf gcc-obj.tar.bz2 gcc-obj
rm -r gcc-obj
mkd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53961
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2012-07-14 19:13:57
UTC ---
The testcase works for me with:
GNU C (GCC) version 4.7.2 20120713 (prerelease) [gcc-4_7-branch revision
189471] (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
and 4.8.0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53961
--- Comment #4 from wbrana 2012-07-14 19:22:16 UTC ---
Are you using X32 GCC binary?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53965
--- Comment #1 from gollumdelperdiguero at gmail dot com 2012-07-14 19:56:58
UTC ---
Created attachment 27790
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27790
Preprocessed file
Preprocessed file generated by g++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53961
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2012-07-14
20:13:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Are you using X32 GCC binary?
So -mx32 makes it fail or rather GCC defaulting to x32 makes it fail?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53961
--- Comment #6 from wbrana 2012-07-14 20:17:23 UTC ---
if gcc is compiled as X32
/usr/bin/gcc: file format elf32-x86-64
and command
gcc -m64 -O2 -c ./host_ppc_isel.i -o test.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53959
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-07-14 20:31:49
UTC ---
Created attachment 27791
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27791
A testcase
With this patch:
diff --git a/gcc/gimple.c b/gcc/gimple.c
index b419591..988a0aa 100644
--- a/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53966
Bug #: 53966
Summary: procmail build deadloop on _autotst & -O3
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48947
leif.walsh at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leif.walsh at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53966
--- Comment #1 from Dzianis Kahanovich 2012-07-14
20:49:30 UTC ---
x86_64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53967
Bug #: 53967
Summary: GCC produces slow code for convolution algorithm with
-mfpmath=sse (the AMD_64 default)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53967
--- Comment #1 from bfriesen at simple dot dallas.tx.us 2012-07-14 20:55:48 UTC
---
Created attachment 27793
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27793
Build log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53967
--- Comment #2 from bfriesen at simple dot dallas.tx.us 2012-07-14 20:56:55 UTC
---
Created attachment 27794
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27794
Sample portable source file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53967
--- Comment #3 from bfriesen at simple dot dallas.tx.us 2012-07-14 20:57:58 UTC
---
Created attachment 27795
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27795
Pre-processed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53967
--- Comment #4 from bfriesen at simple dot dallas.tx.us 2012-07-14 20:58:59 UTC
---
Created attachment 27796
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27796
Generated assembler code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53967
--- Comment #5 from bfriesen at simple dot dallas.tx.us 2012-07-14 21:06:27 UTC
---
Please note that while I mentioned GCC 4.6.2, the same problem is also observed
with GCC 4.7.1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53966
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
--- Comment #2 from And
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53961
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2012-07-14 21:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53961
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53967
--- Comment #6 from bfriesen at simple dot dallas.tx.us 2012-07-14 21:42:38 UTC
---
Created attachment 27797
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27797
Pre-processed GraphicsMagick source (effect.c).
In case the small sample (which
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53961
--- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak 2012-07-14 21:48:32
UTC ---
Can you test following patch that prevents non-register AND address operands:
--cut here--
Index: i386.c
===
--- i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #3 from Evgeniy Dushistov 2012-07-14
22:18:12 UTC ---
I searched commit which cause error.
Here is result of running test from this bugreport, with such command:
arm-none-eabi-g++ -O2 -g -c /tmp/test.cpp
good:
r182757 | paolo | 2011-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53961
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu 2012-07-14 22:36:57
UTC ---
This only happens on hjl/x32/gcc-4_7-branch branch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53961
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu 2012-07-14 22:46:29
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Can you test following patch that prevents non-register AND address operands:
>
> --cut here--
> Index: i386.c
>
uages=c,c++ CC='clang -w -fcatch-undefined-behavior' CXX='clang++
-w -fcatch-undefined-behavior' --prefix=/home/regehr/z/checked-gcc-install
--disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20120714 (experimental) (GCC)
IOC tool:
http://embed.cs.utah.edu/ioc/
Defects:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53968
--- Comment #1 from John Regehr 2012-07-14 22:53:06
UTC ---
Also there are about 50 defects relating to C99's restrictive rules for
left-shifts of signed integers. I have omitted them since people typically
don't care to fix these. If anyone wa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53961
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53969
Bug #: 53969
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on
Android(use NDK)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53965
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-15
00:29:38 UTC ---
The code is not valid, in-class initializers must use a
"brace-or-equals-initializer" meaning:
A a{ init };
or:
A a = init;
not:
A a( init );
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53969
zhangbin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |other
Version|4.3.4
50 matches
Mail list logo
