http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53880
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-07-08 07:08:13 UTC ---
Unfortunately jimis' patch from Bug 53525 doesn't help much:
c++ -c -o pch.hpp.gch /usr/include/boost/math/special_functions.hpp 156.69s
user 0.33s system 99% cpu 2:37.50 total
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-07-08 08:20:02 UTC ---
I don't know where the libtool bug tracker is, though I presume it has
one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab 2012-07-08 08:26:03
UTC ---
bug-libt...@gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51094
--- Comment #23 from jimis 2012-07-08 10:02:14 UTC ---
Iain, ro: Do you know of some darwin or solaris i386 machine where I can test
some changes to this patch?
Does the bug mentioned in comment #15 and comment #16 needs special configure
flags?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51094
--- Comment #24 from Iain Sandoe 2012-07-08 10:24:45
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Iain, ro: Do you know of some darwin or solaris i386 machine where I can test
> some changes to this patch?
>
> Does the bug mentioned in comment #15 and c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|VERIFIED|RESOLVED
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53892
Bug #: 53892
Summary: Invalid "duplicate case value" for C++11 utf-16 char
literals
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53893
Bug #: 53893
Summary: segfault with invalid c++ code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53893
--- Comment #1 from Elias Pipping 2012-07-08
11:21:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 27762
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27762
test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53886
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53886
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53893
--- Comment #2 from Elias Pipping 2012-07-08
11:43:11 UTC ---
% g++-4.7 -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++-4.7
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with:
/var/tmp/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53886
--- Comment #3 from Ryan Mansfield 2012-07-08
11:52:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 27763
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27763
preprocessed src
Sorry, I had tried to attach it during the bug creation but I didn't notice it
did
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53892
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53690
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arnetheduck at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53893
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53886
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-08 12:19:09
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created attachment 27763 [details]
> preprocessed src
>
> Sorry, I had tried to attach it during the bug creation but I didn't notice it
> didn't take.
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53886
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sh4-unknown-linux-gnu |sh*-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53886
--- Comment #5 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-07-08
13:41:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The patch below fixes this particular crash, but I'm not sure whether it is
> the right thing to do in this case.
Looks fine to me except that the line
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53886
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-08 13:45:28
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > The patch below fixes this particular crash, but I'm not sure whether it is
> > the right thing to do in this case.
>
> Looks fine
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53886
--- Comment #7 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-07-08
13:59:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Maybe backport it to 4.7, too?
If it's a regression also on 4.7. The test case doesn't fail with 4.7.1
on my environment, though.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53893
Elias Pipping changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27762|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #41 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-08
15:03:26 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sun Jul 8 15:03:21 2012
New Revision: 189360
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189360
Log:
PR target/51244
* config/sh/sh.md (*branch_
Hi - I've been regularly building gcc for nearly two decades, and now
attempting to build a bootstrap
"C" only gcc-4.7.1 sufficient only to build binutils (my initial first
step is always to rebuild binutils
with the bootstrap "C" only compiler before doing a complete "make"
with "--enable-languag
OK, so I'm reconfiguring with :
--enable-languages=c --disable-build-with-cxx
--disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx --enable-stage1-checking=all
--enable-stage1-languages=c
but why should I have to ? Shouldn't "--enable-languages=c" be enough
to disable building the C++ compiler and libstdc++ ?
T
Hi,
The gcc-bugs mailing list is for automated emails from our Bugzilla
database. Your question is not about a bug, so would be more
appropriate on the gcc-help mailing list.
The answer to your question is that GCC itself is now built using a
C++ compiler, so it needs to build the C++ compiler t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53882
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose 2012-07-08
17:59:33 UTC ---
still see this with trunk 189355
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53690
--- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher 2012-07-08
20:23:40 UTC ---
Test case:
$ cat testsuite/g++.dg/pr53690.C
// { dg-do compile }
// { dg-options "-std=c++11" }
extern "C" int printf (__const char *__restrict __format, ...);
typedef unsigned sh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53883
--- Comment #3 from Daryle Walker 2012-07-08
20:45:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > (Should I try building GCC 4.7.1 straight from you guys, without going
> > through
> > MacPorts?)
>
> Yes, probably.
I'm work
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53690
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |tromey at redhat dot com
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53690
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-08
21:44:28 UTC ---
For the record,
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2170.html changed the
behaviour so UCNs corresponding to control characters are allowed in character
and stri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53690
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53894
Bug #: 53894
Summary: compile erroe
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53887
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
Binutils 2.22.52.20120515) 1.11
gcc version 4.7.2 20120629 (prerelease) [gcc-4_7-branch revision 189081] (GCC)
gcc version 4.8.0 20120623 (experimental) [trunk revision 188906] (GCC)
gcc version 4.8.0 20120708 (experimental) [trunk revision 189362] (GCC)
cat thread.cpp
include
#include
#in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53887
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53887
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-07-09 05:29:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Dup of Bug 53881. Already fixed.
Sorry this isn't a dup (just the same error message).
Further reduced:
enum
{ Failed, NoError, NoDiskette }
a;
int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53895
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53887
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|steven at g
39 matches
Mail list logo
