http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53871
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53884
Bug #: 53884
Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: in
function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:818 with
-flto -fno-weak
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53885
Bug #: 53885
Summary: seg. fault during assignment to allocatable component
withing type-bounded proc.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53885
--- Comment #1 from wangmianzhi 2012-07-07
12:08:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 27758
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27758
a reduced example
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53882
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53881
--- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher 2012-07-07
12:35:49 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Sat Jul 7 12:35:44 2012
New Revision: 189349
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189349
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/53881
* tree-s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53881
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53883
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-07
12:46:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> (Should I try building GCC 4.7.1 straight from you guys, without going through
> MacPorts?)
Yes, probably.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53884
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53235
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2012-07-07
14:13:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> -fdebug-types-section regresses static scope of types
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14148
>
> suggests the stub DW_TAG_struct_type should
-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-root
--with-newlib --enable-threads=no --disable-shared --enable-__cxa_atexit
--disable-nls --enable-symvers=gnu --enable-languages=c
--enable-target-optspace --enable-checking --disable-libmudflap
--disable-libssp
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.8.0 20120707 (experimental
8.0 20120707 (experimental) [trunk revision 189349] (GCC)
$ ./xgcc -B. ~/t.i -O2
/home/ryan/t.i: In function ‘fdc_setup’:
/home/ryan/t.i:51:1: internal compiler error: in hoist_edge_and_branch_if_true,
at tree-switch-conversion.c:79
}
^
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53578
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-07
18:13:24 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Jul 7 18:13:19 2012
New Revision: 189351
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189351
Log:
PR libstdc++/53578
* include/ext/concurre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53888
Bug #: 53888
Summary: gthr-win32.h defines __gthread_mutex_destroy with
wrong return type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53578
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-07
18:35:58 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Jul 7 18:35:52 2012
New Revision: 189352
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189352
Log:
PR libstdc++/53578
* include/ext/concurre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53578
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53578
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53888
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-07
18:39:45 UTC ---
Untested patch
diff --git a/libgcc/config/i386/gthr-win32.h b/libgcc/config/i386/gthr-win32.h
index 53f8396..f2dded2 100644
--- a/libgcc/config/i386/gthr-win32.h
+++ b/libgcc/config
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53889
Bug #: 53889
Summary: Gthreads doesn't support destroying recursive mutexes
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53889
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-07
18:50:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 27760
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27760
Add __gthread_recursive_mutex_destroy.
Untested.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53890
Bug #: 53890
Summary: bogus array bounds warning
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53890
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-07-07
21:27:27 UTC ---
What happens here is that we do a jump threading for the case where words == 0
which produces an out of bounds array reference.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53891
Bug #: 53891
Summary: CFLAGS set in configure don't propagate
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53891
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-07-08
03:05:56 UTC ---
If you want a debuggable GCC there is a better way than using CFLAGS and
BOOT_CFLAGS and without using --disable-bootstrap. Do the following:
configure for a normal build
make all-gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
jimis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #7 from jimis 2012-07-08 03
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49970
jimis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #8 from jimis 2012-07-08
26 matches
Mail list logo
