[Bug fortran/53796] I/O INQUIRE of RECL: If not specified in OPEN, the default value should be returned (sequential access)

2012-06-30 Thread clivegpage at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53796 --- Comment #12 from Clive Page 2012-06-30 08:40:34 UTC --- Jerry > Try this variation: > > integer(kind=8) :: s, r > open(unit=1, file='testsize.f90', status='old', recl=500) > inquire(unit=1, size=s, recl=r) > print *, 'size=', s, ' recl=', r

[Bug c++/53810] template class static not defined

2012-06-30 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53810 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/51179] poor vectorization on interlagos.

2012-06-30 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51179 --- Comment #11 from Joost VandeVondele 2012-06-30 11:26:59 UTC --- It looks like this problem is solved in the current 4.7 and 4.8 branches. At least on an avx machine, the best performance found by the code in comment #4 jumps from 5.3Gflops in

[Bug java/53817] New: The import antlr cannot be resolved

2012-06-30 Thread wbrana at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53817 Bug #: 53817 Summary: The import antlr cannot be resolved Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/53818] New: -fno-automatic cannot have initializer

2012-06-30 Thread j.moyard at voila dot fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53818 Bug #: 53818 Summary: -fno-automatic cannot have initializer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P

[Bug target/51244] SH Target: Inefficient conditional branch

2012-06-30 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244 --- Comment #39 from Oleg Endo 2012-06-30 12:00:38 UTC --- Created attachment 27724 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27724 Another patch I have noticed that the branch_true and branch_false insns also require some subreg varia

[Bug java/53819] New: org/antlr/runtime/ANTLRFileStream.java:0:0: internal compiler error: in java_mark_decl_local, at java/decl.c:1912

2012-06-30 Thread wbrana at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53819 Bug #: 53819 Summary: org/antlr/runtime/ANTLRFileStream.java:0:0: internal compiler error: in java_mark_decl_local, at java/decl.c:1912 Classification: Unclassified Prod

[Bug tree-optimization/47657] missed vectorization

2012-06-30 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47657 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/53818] -fno-automatic cannot have initializer

2012-06-30 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53818 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug middle-end/47341] unnecessary versioning in the vectorizer.

2012-06-30 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47341 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2011-01-18 11:21:06 |2012-06-30 11:21:06 --- Comment #3 f

[Bug fortran/53818] -fno-automatic cannot have initializer

2012-06-30 Thread j.moyard at voila dot fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53818 --- Comment #2 from johnjohn 2012-06-30 13:51:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > What version of gfortran are you using? (gfortran --version) > > If you're using the standard RH5.7 gfortran, it's probably version 4.1.x, > which > is from the

[Bug fortran/53818] -finit-local-zero -fno-automatic: Function result cannot have initializer

2012-06-30 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53818 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug fortran/53818] -finit-local-zero -fno-automatic: Function result cannot have initializer

2012-06-30 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53818 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-06-30 14:41:08 UTC --- Draft patch - completely untested. --- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c @@ -10271,3 +10330,3 @@ apply_default_init_local (gfc_symbol *sym) if (sym->attr.save ||

[Bug debug/53820] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in vt_expand_var_loc_chain, at var-tracking.c:8029

2012-06-30 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53820 Bug #: 53820 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in vt_expand_var_loc_chain, at var-tracking.c:8029 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug c++/53786] [C++11] alias template causes g++ segfault

2012-06-30 Thread mustrumr97 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53786 --- Comment #2 from Hristo Venev 2012-06-30 15:19:29 UTC --- Reduced: template class list{}; template using tail=list; template using tail2=tail;

[Bug c++/53821] New: [4.7.2,4.8 regression][c++11] multiple definitions of lambda

2012-06-30 Thread vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53821 Bug #: 53821 Summary: [4.7.2,4.8 regression][c++11] multiple definitions of lambda Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/53780] [l4.7.1 lto] linker fails with lto and "standard" object file

2012-06-30 Thread vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53780 --- Comment #10 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-06-30 15:24:24 UTC --- reduced testcase for comment 3 regression as PR53821

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

2012-06-30 Thread vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 --- Comment #12 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-06-30 15:25:27 UTC --- reduced testcase for comment 7&8 regression as PR53821

[Bug c++/53821] [4.7.2,4.8 regression][c++11] multiple definitions of lambda

2012-06-30 Thread vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53821 --- Comment #1 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-06-30 15:33:15 UTC --- to clarify: in compiles and links correctly provided that template inline int Foo::bar(int i, int j) or if instead of the lambda "bar" invokes the external "ebar"

[Bug c++/53822] New: Diagnostic: spell out type in ambiguous call

2012-06-30 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53822 Bug #: 53822 Summary: Diagnostic: spell out type in ambiguous call Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c++/53822] Diagnostic: spell out type in ambiguous call

2012-06-30 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53822 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2012-06-30 16:59:13 UTC --- Hmm, the true message from 4.8, not 4.7 this time: mp.cc: In function 'int main()': mp.cc:6:6: error: call of overloaded 'f(NT&)' is ambiguous f(i); ^ mp.cc:6:6: note: candidat

[Bug fortran/45159] Unnecessary temporaries

2012-06-30 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45159 --- Comment #26 from Thomas Koenig 2012-06-30 17:20:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) Hi Dominique, > (I have done the proof on the back of an envelope that I cannot find right > now.) Can you find that particular envelope again? I tried t

[Bug middle-end/53823] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930921-1.c execution at -O0 and -O1

2012-06-30 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
20120630 (experimental) [trunk revision 189094] (GCC)

[Bug c++/53821] [4.7.2,4.8 regression][c++11] multiple definitions of lambda

2012-06-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53821 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/53824] New: ICE with ALLOCATE of coarrays

2012-06-30 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53824 Bug #: 53824 Summary: ICE with ALLOCATE of coarrays Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity:

[Bug fortran/53796] I/O INQUIRE of RECL: If not specified in OPEN, the default value should be returned (sequential access)

2012-06-30 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53796 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #13 f

[Bug java/53817] The import antlr cannot be resolved

2012-06-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53817 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-06-30 21:08:36 UTC --- I think you still need the *.class in the CLASSPATH to be able to import them.

[Bug java/53817] The import antlr cannot be resolved

2012-06-30 Thread wbrana at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53817 --- Comment #2 from wbrana 2012-06-30 21:11:24 UTC --- It seems jar files have to be in CLASSPATH instead of so files.

[Bug java/53817] The import antlr cannot be resolved

2012-06-30 Thread wbrana at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53817 wbrana changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug java/53819] org/antlr/runtime/ANTLRFileStream.java:0:0: internal compiler error: in java_mark_decl_local, at java/decl.c:1912

2012-06-30 Thread wbrana at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53819 wbrana changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/53820] [4.8 Regression] ICE in vt_expand_var_loc_chain, at var-tracking.c:8029

2012-06-30 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53820 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/53825] New: Overloading with __m128d and __m256d fails

2012-06-30 Thread luc_j_bourhis at mac dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53825 Bug #: 53825 Summary: Overloading with __m128d and __m256d fails Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.6 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c++/53825] Overloading with __m128d and __m256d fails

2012-06-30 Thread luc_j_bourhis at mac dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53825 --- Comment #1 from Luc J. Bourhis 2012-06-30 23:31:26 UTC --- Sorry, sent too early! On more recent version of gcc, an error message would have told me to add "-fabi-version=0". Doing so with the version at hand does not fix the problem: ~/Dev

[Bug c++/53825] Overloading with __m128d and __m256d fails

2012-06-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53825 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/53813] [4.7 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2016

2012-06-30 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53813 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Target|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa*-*-* Host|hppa64-h