http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53752
Bug #: 53752
Summary: ice in write_array_type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53753
Bug #: 53753
Summary: stack based constructor is not called for Class1
Object1()
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53752
--- Comment #1 from dcb 2012-06-23 08:22:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 27689
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27689
gzipped C++ source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53753
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-06-23
08:55:40 UTC ---
>Myclass instance1();
I think this is really a function declaration name instance1 returning Myclass
and not a variable declaration.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53746
vincenzo Innocente changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[lto] segfault in |[lto] segfault in
Innocente
2012-06-23 09:37:33 UTC ---
just updated to latest trunk and
$CXXGO -Wl,-v stubs.o -shared -o libstubs.so -Wl,-rpath=./
collect2 version 4.8.0 20120623 (experimental) [trunk revision 188906]
/home/innocent/gccDir/bin/ld -plugin
/home/innocent/gccDir/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux
ir --enable-languages=c,c++,lto -enable-gold=yes
--enable-lto -enable-libitm -disable-multilib --with-ppl --with-cloog
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20120623 (experimental) [trunk revision 188906] (GCC)
on fedora 17
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53753
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53746
vincenzo Innocente changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[lto] segfault in |[lto] segfault in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53753
--- Comment #3 from Kiran Puttur 2012-06-23
10:14:38 UTC ---
Thanks Andrew, Daniel,
If I use the braces {} then I can see my testing strings printed in the program
output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53753
--- Comment #4 from Kiran Puttur 2012-06-23
10:15:22 UTC ---
Thanks Andrew, Daniel,
If I use the braces {} then I can see my testing strings printed in the program
output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53755
Bug #: 53755
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in replace_reg_with_saved_mem, at
caller-save.c:1125 on i586-linux-gnu
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53754
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53753
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53755
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53752
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41951
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-23 13:54:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Here is a reduced version of comment 2, which is invalid according to comment
> 10:
Here is a non-abstract version of the test case in comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53756
Bug #: 53756
Summary: ICE: in gen_type_die_with_usage, at dwarf2out.c:18774
with -g and operator auto ()
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53754
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ccoutant at google dot com
--- Comm
4.8.0 20120623 (experimental) [trunk revision 188906] (GCC)
/home/innocent/gccDir/buildLTO/./prev-gcc/g++
-B/home/innocent/gccDir/buildLTO/./prev-gcc/
-B/home/innocent/gccDir/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -nostdinc++
-B/home/innocent/gccDir/buildLTO/prev-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu 2012-06-23 14:51:07
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Hehe, i still love them ;)
> But inline summaries are separate of cgraph, so it is not cgraph checker's
> work
> to verify it ;))
>
> I think the problem is in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53755
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53700
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53749
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson 2012-06-23
16:42:26 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Sat Jun 23 16:42:19 2012
New Revision: 188909
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188909
Log:
PR target/53749
* config/i386/i386.c (ix8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53026
kennytm at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kennytm at gmail dot com
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53749
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51434
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
27 matches
Mail list logo
