http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43581
--- Comment #7 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-06-15 07:46:47 UTC ---
This problem was most probably due to binutils as I can reproduce it even with
4.8 using
GNU gold (GNU Binutils 2.21.51.20110514) 1.11
while looks fixed with
GNU gold (GNU Binuti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53679
Bug #: 53679
Summary: Build failure in libgo
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
Bug #: 53680
Summary: Link problems with static libstdc++
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53681
Bug #: 53681
Summary: s390 bootstrap failure since 187965
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53681
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53681
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53675
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
--- Comment #2 from __vic 2012-06-15 08:30:06 UTC ---
$ uname -a
Linux m246 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Nov 9 12:54:40 EST 2010 i686 i686
i386 GNU/Linux
$ cat /etc/*-release
CentOS release 5.4 (Final)
When building on
$ uname -a
Linux jansmb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53681
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel 2012-06-15
08:30:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This is an ice-on-invalid - how can that break bootstrap?
delta was a bit too eager. Same happens with:
int
__gcov_execle (const char *path, char *arg, .
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
--- Comment #3 from __vic 2012-06-15 08:34:13 UTC ---
When I'm trying link libstdc++.a statically to my .so I see messages like:
"undefined versioned symbol name std::defer_lock@@GLIBCPP_3"
$ nm libstdc++.a | grep @
shows me that archive con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53681
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49894
__vic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #13 from __vic 2012-06-15 08:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
--- Comment #4 from __vic 2012-06-15 08:57:21 UTC ---
Note: undocumented configure option --disable-symvers helps but I think
building with default parameters must work properly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53533
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-15
09:03:04 UTC ---
This started with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173856
The current cost model is seriously insufficient.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou 2012-06-15
09:22:04 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jun 15 09:22:00 2012
New Revision: 188651
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188651
Log:
PR middle-end/53590
* common.opt (-fdel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
--- Comment #5 from __vic 2012-06-15 10:22:36 UTC ---
The exact description:
$ g++ -o formats/alcatel_alm9_decoder.fmt -shared -Llib -static-libgcc -O3
-Wl,-s -Wl,--no-undefined src/alcatel_alm9_decoder.o formats.a decoder.a
-ljanuary_tools -lja
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-15
10:25:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Note: undocumented configure option --disable-symvers helps but I think
> building with default parameters must work properly
It's not undocumented
http:/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-15
10:29:36 UTC ---
isn't this PR 52689 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
--- Comment #8 from __vic 2012-06-15 10:30:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Note: undocumented configure option --disable-symvers helps but I think
> > building with default parameters must work properly
>
> It's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
--- Comment #9 from __vic 2012-06-15 10:33:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> isn't this PR 52689 ?
Probably it is.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
--- Comment #10 from __vic 2012-06-15 10:36:24 UTC ---
When 4.7.1 will be released?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53680
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52689
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d.v.a at ngs dot ru
--- Comment #23 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53592
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2012-06-15
10:41:19 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jun 15 10:41:13 2012
New Revision: 188653
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188653
Log:
PR ada/53592
* gcc-interface/gigi.h (ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53682
Bug #: 53682
Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in cselib_lookup (SEGV) on
i586-linux-gnu
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53592
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2012-06-15
10:46:16 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Jun 15 10:46:12 2012
New Revision: 188654
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188654
Log:
PR ada/53592
* gcc-interface/gigi.h (ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53592
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51581
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-15
11:07:54 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 15 11:07:47 2012
New Revision: 188656
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188656
Log:
PR tree-optimization/51581
* expr.h (choose
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51581
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53589
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53580
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53683
Bug #: 53683
Summary: cout doesn't support std::u16string
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53682
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53683
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53682
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-06-15
12:00:45 UTC ---
Possible the second two calls of promote_debug_loc should be replaced by a loop
over the locs, looking for the right l->loc that -g0 would have created in that
case. Anyway, it needs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53684
Bug #: 53684
Summary: Cannot raise custom exceptions in configurable runtime
mode
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53683
--- Comment #2 from Rui Maciel 2012-06-15
13:08:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > If, in the test program, std::u16string is replaced with std::u32string, the
> > program is successfully compiled.
>
> That's surp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53636
--- Comment #1 from Ulrich Weigand 2012-06-15
13:30:40 UTC ---
Author: uweigand
Date: Fri Jun 15 13:30:36 2012
New Revision: 188661
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188661
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/53636
* t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52672
nightstrike changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nightstrike at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53681
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53685
Bug #: 53685
Summary: surprising warns about transfer with explicit
character range
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53683
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590
--- Comment #11 from Georg 2012-06-15 14:54:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Fixed on the mainline.
Perfect result when run with -fdelete-dead-exceptions, or when
run without the switch (i.e., switches as before).
Adding -fno-delete-dead-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38474
--- Comment #58 from Michael Matz 2012-06-15 14:56:33
UTC ---
Author: matz
Date: Fri Jun 15 14:56:26 2012
New Revision: 188667
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188667
Log:
PR middle-end/38474
* cfgexpand.c (add_alias
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53636
--- Comment #2 from Ulrich Weigand 2012-06-15
15:11:51 UTC ---
Now fixed on mainline; still fails on 4.7.
(While the bug is probably latent even earlier, this particular test case does
not crash on 4.6.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38474
--- Comment #59 from Michael Matz 2012-06-15 15:12:59
UTC ---
There should be no compile performance problems in expand anymore.
The alias stmt walker as used from IPA remains a problem, though.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53673
--- Comment #3 from Niall Douglas 2012-06-15
15:13:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> There's no point differentiating the gnu variants, they don't have any ABI
> impact.
They don't have any ABI impact that we know of at the present time in t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53673
--- Comment #4 from Niall Douglas 2012-06-15
15:23:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> you can use -frecord-gcc-switches to detect mixed objects in linked library.
Indeed, one could grok the .text section this adds, parse the command line and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38474
--- Comment #60 from Joost VandeVondele
2012-06-15 15:26:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #59)
> There should be no compile performance problems in expand anymore.
> The alias stmt walker as used from IPA remains a problem, though.
Thanks... expa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53673
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-15
15:37:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > There's no point differentiating the gnu variants, they don't have any ABI
> > impact.
>
> They don't have any ABI impact tha
n:/usr/bin:/bin gnatchop -r -v unit.ada
GNATCHOP 4.8.0 20120615 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 1998-2012, Free Software Foundation, Inc.
/home/bauhaus/mine/bin/gcc -c -x ada -gnats -gnatu unit.ada
splitting unit.ada into:
raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow or erroneous memory access
$
${HOME}/m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53679
--- Comment #1 from safety0ff.bugz at gmail dot com 2012-06-15 15:52:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 27626
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27626
Allows me to compile it, I do know if there's any value if checking for errors
writin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53679
safety0ff.bugz at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27626|Allows me to compile it, I |Allows me to compile it,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53685
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53679
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-06-15
16:41:53 UTC ---
Actually this is due to your modifications to gcc to enable fority by default
and glibc's bad idea that write needs to be check for error after each write.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033
--- Comment #27 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-06-15 16:43:44 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Fri Jun 15 16:43:36 2012
New Revision: 188671
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188671
Log:
2012-06-15 Marc Glisse
PR c++/510
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53673
--- Comment #6 from Niall Douglas 2012-06-15
16:53:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > They don't have any ABI impact that we know of at the present time in this
> > present generation of GCCs. As a debug aid that's likely to be there from
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53685
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-06-15
17:02:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (a) A minor one that in the second case, the length of "record_type" is
> "e->ts->u.cl->length == NULL" instead of 4 (as one could be simply
> calculated).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53687
Bug #: 53687
Summary: _mm_cmpistri generates redundant movslq %ecx,%rcx on
x86-64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53673
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-15
17:46:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Technically, you could add it to the top of or whatever is a
> guaranteed included library header:
libstdc++'s would be the right place and as part of t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53688
Bug #: 53688
Summary: [4.8 Regression] 191.fma3d in SPEC CPU 2000
miscompiled
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53689
Bug #: 53689
Summary: [SH] GCC emits an invalid slot instruction for RTE
(Return from Exception)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53688
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||areg.melikadamyan at gmail
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52816
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53690
Bug #: 53690
Summary: \u and \U are wrong encoded as U+0001.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53675
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-15
19:43:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 27627
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27627
Build log with new binutils
Using a newer binutils (2.22) the errors about dwarf4 are gone, but th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53672
--- Comment #4 from bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-15 19:44:04 UTC ---
Author: bviyer
Date: Fri Jun 15 19:43:57 2012
New Revision: 188680
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188680
Log:
This patch fixes bug PR 53672.
2012-06-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53672
--- Comment #5 from Balaji V. Iyer 2012-06-15
19:46:13 UTC ---
Hello John,
The revision mentioned above should fix this problem.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53691
Bug #: 53691
Summary: ICE in LAPACK 3.4.1 cgbrfsx.f
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53671
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53692
Bug #: 53692
Summary: OPTIONAL: Scalarizing over the wrong array
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Sev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53690
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53691
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53533
--- Comment #18 from Richard Henderson 2012-06-15
21:04:49 UTC ---
See comments in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg01081.html
It's not the vectorization costing, as previously suggested.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53691
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-06-15
21:23:42 UTC ---
Reduced test case
SUBROUTINE CGBRFSX(N, RWORK)
INTEGER N
REAL RWORK(*)
REAL ZERO
PARAMETER (ZERO = 0.0E+0)
call foo(TRANSFER (RWORK(1:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53565
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53679
--- Comment #3 from Allan McRae 2012-06-15
22:36:54 UTC ---
Just to be clear, I have not modified the compiler to enable fortify by
default, but it is in my CFLAGS...
As this is the only place that glibc's decision to enforce a check on the
retu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53693
Bug #: 53693
Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE in
vect_get_vec_def_for_stmt_copy, at
tree-vect-stmts.c:1438
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53691
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53691
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2
Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regress
82 matches
Mail list logo
