http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-05-23 07:04:51 UTC ---
On Tue, 22 May 2012, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438
>
> --- Comment #8 from William J. Schmidt
> 2012-05-22 18:04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53426
--- Comment #11 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-05-23 08:03:54 UTC ---
sorry I cannot test the patch on the original failing files as at revision
187789 I get
cat > ipa.patch
--- tree-ssa-structalias.c (revision 187695)
+++ tree-ssa-structalias
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53398
--- Comment #3 from Roman Wieczorek 2012-05-23
08:11:43 UTC ---
Just to clarify, the exact way msc places methods in vtable is:
Grouping the overloaded methods.
Placing them in reverted order in starting where first of those overload group
occur
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53444
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-23
08:34:16 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed May 23 08:34:06 2012
New Revision: 187796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187796
Log:
2012-05-23 Tobias Burnus
PR libfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52700
--- Comment #9 from Pawel Sikora 2012-05-23 08:41:17
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I tried it with --enable-languages=all
>
> ?
libssp and others *silently* disable gnu versioning when you pass
--enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace. the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53458
Bug #: 53458
Summary: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at
recog.c:2077
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53444
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53445
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-23
08:52:17 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed May 23 08:52:09 2012
New Revision: 187797
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187797
Log:
2012-05-23 Robert Mason
Tobias Burn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53445
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
2.6.32 system on 2012-05-11.
"current" trunk
gcc version 4.8.0 20120523 (experimental) [trunk revision 187789] (GCC
configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/home/data/newsoft/usr
-enable-languages=c,c++ -enable-gold=yes --enable-lto
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto CFLAGS=&
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53458
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||ba-elf
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53373
--- Comment #12 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-05-23 09:18:02 UTC ---
gcc build for me with -march=native equivalent to -march=bdver1 (and therefore
-mavx)
with the "latest" trunk revision 187789
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53161
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka 2012-05-23
09:23:47 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed May 23 09:23:40 2012
New Revision: 187798
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187798
Log:
PR middle-end/53161
* symtab.c (symtab_re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47624
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||49888
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oli
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49888
--- Comment #1 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-05-23
09:30:29 UTC ---
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg01546.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53426
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka 2012-05-23
09:47:14 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed May 23 09:47:10 2012
New Revision: 187799
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187799
Log:
PR middle-end/53426
* tree-ssa-structalia
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53426
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53426
--- Comment #14 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-05-23 11:53:13 UTC ---
fix confirmed
trunk revision 187799
compiles again my large application
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53137
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438
--- Comment #10 from William J. Schmidt
2012-05-23 12:35:11 UTC ---
Sure. My testing was on 4.7, so I'll sanity-test trunk first. I can commit
the backport next week also, assuming no fallout between now and then.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53306
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-05-23 12:39:31 UTC ---
On Wed, 23 May 2012, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438
>
> --- Comment #10 from William J. Schmidt
> 2012-05-23 12:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456
--- Comment #4 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-23 13:10:14 UTC ---
VxWorks does not provide the process time in most versions and for most cases.
In fact, many VxWorks applications are not processes in the traditional sense
but instead tasks/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457
--- Comment #3 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-23 13:13:16 UTC ---
I don't know much about fixincludes, but it *seems* to me like it could be done
with fixincludes. I don't know how to get fixincludes to do that, though.
Also, sorry for the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-23
13:47:49 UTC ---
Then, please investigate that possibility, maybe ask for help on the mailing
list too, in principle I consider it a better solution.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29185
--- Comment #10 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-23 14:19:37 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed May 23 14:19:27 2012
New Revision: 187801
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187801
Log:
/cp
2012-05-23 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29185
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29185
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53459
Bug #: 53459
Summary: ../../work/libcpp/lex.c:593:18: error: typedef
'check_count' locally defined but not used
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53432
--- Comment #3 from Roman Kononov 2012-05-23
14:58:28 UTC ---
It broke in r187631
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-05/msg00628.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53432
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2012-05-23 15:04:20 UTC
---
Yes, it is just overactive sanity check. I am testing the fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32089
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2012-05-23
15:07:13 UTC ---
Yes, it is a prediction of future, see
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.43.6404 for details.
Inline decision and branch prediction is set of heuristics that are ba
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53448
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-05-23
15:25:27 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed May 23 15:25:22 2012
New Revision: 187803
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187803
Log:
PR target/53448
* config/avr/avr.h (ASM_OU
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53448
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-05-23
15:28:11 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed May 23 15:28:05 2012
New Revision: 187804
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187804
Log:
Backport from 2012-05-23 mainline r187803
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53448
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53460
Bug #: 53460
Summary: Internal compiler error: in calc_dfs_tree, at
dominance.c:395
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53460
--- Comment #1 from Allan Jensen 2012-05-23
15:34:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 27481
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27481
FontFastPath.ii.gz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Ever Confirmed|1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53460
--- Comment #2 from Allan Jensen 2012-05-23
15:37:32 UTC ---
It appears I am not allowed to make more than one attachment so you will have
to do with one example. Here is the console output:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/bin/g++
Target:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53461
Bug #: 53461
Summary: Incorrect handling of CASE_VECTOR_PC_RELATIVE in
config/m68k.md
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49863
James E. King, III changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jim.king at simplivity dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49863
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-23
17:20:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> If I declare
> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 on the command line, the headers should not override me
> just because it is not an optimized build. Is there some other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53378
--- Comment #5 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-23 17:27:09 UTC ---
Could this be fixed by a fixincludes stub somewhat like the following?
/*
* Work around same-named gcc header regs.h in taskLib.h on VxWorks
*/
fix = {
hackname= vx
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438
--- Comment #12 from William J. Schmidt
2012-05-23 17:38:44 UTC ---
Hm, the auto-commenter isn't working. Committed to trunk:
2012-05-23 Richard Guenther
PR tree-optimization/53438
* tree-sra.c (analyze_access_subtree): Correct bitf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53462
Bug #: 53462
Summary: template method constant folding division-by-zero
warning within dead code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.6
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53378
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-23
17:50:44 UTC ---
> Could this be fixed by a fixincludes stub somewhat like the following?
I don't understand why you cannot use a similar trick as ada/sigtramp-ppcvxw.c.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53378
--- Comment #7 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-23 17:57:53 UTC ---
> > Could this be fixed by a fixincludes stub somewhat like the following?
>
> I don't understand why you cannot use a similar trick as
> ada/sigtramp-ppcvxw.c.
Isn't that t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53462
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|rikaigcc at r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11856
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rikaigcc at rikai dot com
--- Comment #35
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53462
--- Comment #2 from rudick at gmail dot com 2012-05-23 18:27:43 UTC ---
It looks related, but are you sure its a duplicate (if the fix was to turn
off all such warnings)?
I.e., if the code weren't made dead by being short-circuited by " if (I
&&",
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53378
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-23
18:51:55 UTC ---
> Isn't that the same trick? It's just that taskLib.h is not in GCC sources so
> I
> can't just put the change in.
The trick should be in libgcc/config/vxlib.c of course...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456
--- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-05-23 18:52:52
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Wed May 23 18:52:47 2012
New Revision: 187806
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187806
Log:
PR 53456 clock_gettime fallback for gf_gettime
2012
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53389
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-23
19:08:56 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed May 23 19:08:52 2012
New Revision: 187808
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187808
Log:
2012-05-23 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/53
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53389
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-23
19:13:34 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed May 23 19:13:27 2012
New Revision: 187810
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187810
Log:
2012-05-23 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/53
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53389
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53378
--- Comment #9 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-23 19:29:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 27482
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27482
Errors introduced by gcc/regs.h
The problem is that gcc/regs.h introduces its own errors. I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53463
Bug #: 53463
Summary: [4.8 Regression]: system header not recognized,
yielding warnings about long long preprocessor
constant
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53463
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-05-23
20:21:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 27484
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27484
The offending system header _default_types.h, fresh from newlib.
A brief look in gcc-testresult
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53464
Bug #: 53464
Summary: Invalid default value for non-type template parameter
is accepted
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51055
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-23
20:35:44 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed May 23 20:35:30 2012
New Revision: 187811
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187811
Log:
2012-05-23 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/51
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
--- Comment #35 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-23
20:35:42 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed May 23 20:35:30 2012
New Revision: 187811
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187811
Log:
2012-05-23 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51055
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
--- Comment #36 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-23
20:45:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #35)
> New Revision: 187811
That patch fixed comment 14.
REMAINING issues:
- comment 24 first "Does not work.", see also comment 34
- PRs which block this PR,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53463
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50909
Carl Norum changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||carl at lytro dot com
--- Comment #1 from Ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52796
--- Comment #8 from michaelh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-23 21:34:54 UTC ---
Author: michaelh
Date: Wed May 23 21:34:50 2012
New Revision: 187816
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187816
Log:
Fix the PR entry in the ChangeLog.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53170
--- Comment #2 from Michael Hope 2012-05-23
21:43:15 UTC ---
Fixed in r187813. See the follow up in PR52796.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53170
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53462
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465
Bug #: 53465
Summary: [4.7 regression] wrong code with -O1 -ftree-vrp
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53466
Bug #: 53466
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53235
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at google dot com
--- Comment #8 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53467
Bug #: 53467
Summary: xgcc:Internal error: Bus error (program cc1)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53468
Bug #: 53468
Summary: bootstrap fails on debian/amd64, unable to find crti.o
and crtn.o
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
78 matches
Mail list logo
