[Bug fortran/49010] Result of MOD and MODULO intrinsic has wrong sign

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49010 --- Comment #12 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-05-05 07:59:28 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Sat May 5 07:59:22 2012 New Revision: 187191 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187191 Log: PR 49010,24518 MOD/MODULO fixes. gcc/fortran: 201

[Bug fortran/24518] Intrinsic MOD incorrect for large arg1/arg2 and slow.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24518 --- Comment #25 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-05-05 07:59:30 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Sat May 5 07:59:22 2012 New Revision: 187191 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187191 Log: PR 49010,24518 MOD/MODULO fixes. gcc/fortran: 201

[Bug fortran/49010] Result of MOD and MODULO intrinsic has wrong sign

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49010 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/53244] New: internal compiler error while build for target c6x-elf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53244 Bug #: 53244 Summary: internal compiler error while build for target c6x-elf Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker

[Bug libstdc++/53244] internal compiler error while build for target c6x-elf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53244 --- Comment #1 from daniel.calcoen at cern dot ch 2012-05-05 08:20:29 UTC --- Created attachment 27313 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27313 output makefile plus build scripts used

[Bug c/53245] New: ice in expand_case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53245 Bug #: 53245 Summary: ice in expand_case Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug fortran/53191] [OOP] C614 (F2003) or C618 (F2008) not implemented for class expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53191 --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas 2012-05-05 08:49:54 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sat May 5 08:49:43 2012 New Revision: 187192 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187192 Log: 2012-05-05 Paul Thomas PR fortran/41600 *

[Bug fortran/41600] [OOP] SELECT TYPE with associate-name => exp: Arrays not supported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41600 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas 2012-05-05 08:49:53 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sat May 5 08:49:43 2012 New Revision: 187192 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187192 Log: 2012-05-05 Paul Thomas PR fortran/41600

[Bug fortran/41600] [OOP] SELECT TYPE with associate-name => exp: Arrays not supported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41600 --- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas 2012-05-05 08:52:31 UTC --- Fixed on trunk Thanks for the report and sorry that it took more than two years to fix! Paul

[Bug fortran/53191] [OOP] C614 (F2003) or C618 (F2008) not implemented for class expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53191 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/41600] [OOP] SELECT TYPE with associate-name => exp: Arrays not supported

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41600 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/53244] internal compiler error while build for target c6x-elf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53244 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2012-05-05 08:56:27 UTC --- Hello, isn't that the same as PR53209 (and at least 2 other duplicates)? Does this patch fix it for you? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00280.html

[Bug c/53245] ice in expand_case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53245 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot

[Bug c/53245] ice in expand_case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53245 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-05-05 09:16:39 UTC --- CC'ing Steven.

[Bug libstdc++/53244] internal compiler error while build for target c6x-elf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53244 --- Comment #3 from daniel.calcoen at cern dot ch 2012-05-05 09:47:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Hello, > isn't that the same as PR53209 (and at least 2 other duplicates)? Does this > patch fix it for you? > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patche

[Bug fortran/53111] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Derived types cannot be USE-associated again with -std=f95

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53111 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-05 09:53:25 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sat May 5 09:53:21 2012 New Revision: 187193 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187193 Log: 2012-05-05 Tobias Burnus Backport from

[Bug c++/53209] [4.7/4.8 Regression] tree check ICE: expected tree_vec, have error_mark in comp_template_args_with_info, at cp/pt.c:7038

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53209 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.calcoen at cern dot

[Bug libstdc++/53244] internal compiler error while build for target c6x-elf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53244 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/50602] ICE in tree_nrv, at tree-nrv.c:155 during large LTO build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #22

[Bug fortran/53111] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Derived types cannot be USE-associated again with -std=f95

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53111 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/52391] [4.7/4.8 regression] genattrtab almost 5X slower for m68k than in 4.6 and earlier releases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52391 --- Comment #12 from Steven Bosscher 2012-05-05 10:06:32 UTC --- Created attachment 27315 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27315 Avoid diving deep through generated IOR trees for EQ_ATTR This patch tries to keep IOR-trees for

[Bug bootstrap/52391] [4.7/4.8 regression] genattrtab almost 5X slower for m68k than in 4.6 and earlier releases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52391 --- Comment #13 from Steven Bosscher 2012-05-05 10:13:48 UTC --- Created attachment 27316 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27316 Difference in insn-attrtab.c before/after applyin PR52391_compare_IOP_tree_v1.diff tmp-attrtab.c

[Bug c/43772] Errant -Wlogical-op warning when testing limits

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43772 --- Comment #21 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-05-05 11:31:03 UTC --- Author: manu Date: Sat May 5 11:30:57 2012 New Revision: 187194 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187194 Log: 2012-05-05 Manuel López-Ibáñez PR c/4

[Bug c/43772] Errant -Wlogical-op warning when testing limits

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43772 --- Comment #22 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-05-05 11:32:30 UTC --- Author: manu Date: Sat May 5 11:32:26 2012 New Revision: 187195 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187195 Log: 2012-05-05 Manuel López-Ibáñez PR c/4

[Bug target/53246] New: failure building cross compiler for arm7tdmi (arm-none-eabi) in libgcc (multilib)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53246 Bug #: 53246 Summary: failure building cross compiler for arm7tdmi (arm-none-eabi) in libgcc (multilib) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Statu

[Bug tree-optimization/30318] VRP does not create ANTI_RANGEs on overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30318 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27311|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/30318] VRP does not create ANTI_RANGEs on overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30318 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug tree-optimization/30318] VRP does not create ANTI_RANGEs on overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30318 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11 f

[Bug tree-optimization/30318] VRP does not create ANTI_RANGEs on overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30318 --- Comment #12 from Marc Glisse 2012-05-05 13:43:04 UTC --- Er, sorry, don't know what key I accidentally pressed but it apparently sent incomplete messages :-( (In reply to comment #10) > Now for the testcases... ;) Yes, that was also my reac

[Bug c++/40752] -Wconversion generates false warnings for operands not larger than target type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40752 Wes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wessjunk at gmail dot com --- Comment #22 from Wes

[Bug c++/40752] -Wconversion generates false warnings for operands not larger than target type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40752 --- Comment #23 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-05-05 15:30:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) > If someone really thinks there should be a warning for this behavior, how > about > adding a separate > -Wchar-arithmetic > warning which warns on a

[Bug bootstrap/53238] Bootstrap failure: error: 'pthread_mutex_timedlock' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53238 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-05-05 16:05:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > If you're using --enable-thread=posix then it should be defined. I haven't used --enable-thread=posix, and if I invoke ".../xgcc -v", I see "Thread mode

[Bug c++/53247] New: [regression, c++11] can't use a function from a base class of the same name in a different namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53247 Bug #: 53247 Summary: [regression, c++11] can't use a function from a base class of the same name in a different namespace Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.

[Bug c++/53236] using declaration and base function template overloading

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53236 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug bootstrap/53238] Bootstrap failure: error: 'pthread_mutex_timedlock' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53238 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53247] [regression, c++11] can't use a function from a base class of the same name in a different namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53247 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fabien at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/53247] [regression, c++11] can't use a function from a base class of the same name in a different namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53247 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52841] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type 'Solvable' is not a base type for type 'Resolvable'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52841 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b.r.longbons at gmail dot

[Bug c++/53236] using declaration and base function template overloading

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53236 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fabien at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug bootstrap/53238] Bootstrap failure: error: 'pthread_mutex_timedlock' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53238 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-05 18:13:57 UTC --- Created attachment 27320 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27320 diff of regenerated configure N.B. you'll either need to run autoreconf or apply this patch to con

[Bug c++/53236] using declaration and base function template overloading

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53236 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler 2012-05-05 18:57:03 UTC --- Reduced test-case: //- template struct enable_same {}; template struct enable_same { typedef U type; }; template struct other_variant { void get(){} }; template struct o

[Bug bootstrap/37733] GCC Bootstrap fails in Stage 2 AIX 5.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37733 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/53218] cmake segfaults on sparcv9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53218 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/53219] inline function erroneously clobbers %i0 register on 64 bit sparc compile of perls regcomp.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53219 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/53248] New: std::array doesn't work when T is not default-constructible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53248 Bug #: 53248 Summary: std::array doesn't work when T is not default-constructible Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/53230] s-fileio.adb:308:10: warning: ‘Errno’ may be used uninitialized in this function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53230 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/52682] [patch] gcc-4.7.0/gcc/c-family/c-lex.c doesn't compile with old C compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52682 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||skunk at iskunk dot org --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug bootstrap/53237] Bootstrap fails due to mixed declarations and code (c-lex.c)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53237 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/19805] sub-optimal initialisation of array on the stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19805 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/53248] std::array doesn't work when T is not default-constructible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53248 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug c++/53236] using declaration and base function template overloading

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53236 --- Comment #4 from Fernando Pelliccioni 2012-05-05 21:58:53 UTC --- Created attachment 27321 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27321 simplified source code version

[Bug c++/53236] using declaration and base function template overloading

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53236 --- Comment #5 from Fernando Pelliccioni 2012-05-05 22:00:05 UTC --- Here is a simplified code -> "gcc_error_simple.cpp" Shows two facets of the error. See the comments in the attached file.

[Bug c++/53236] using declaration and base function template overloading

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53236 --- Comment #6 from Fernando Pelliccioni 2012-05-05 22:01:23 UTC --- // g++ -std=c++11 gcc_error_simple.cpp // g++ -DWITH_USING_DECLARATION -std=c++11 gcc_error_simple.cpp #include #include #include template struct Base { template

[Bug bootstrap/53249] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53249 Bug #: 53249 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/53249] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53249 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-05-05 22:22:27 UTC --- Created attachment 27322 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27322 A testcase On Linux/x86-64: [hjl@gnu-35 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ -O2 -mx32 -fPIC -S -ftls-model=initial-exec /tm

[Bug libstdc++/53248] std::array doesn't work when T is not default-constructible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53248 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-05 23:27:26 UTC --- The basic design of our std::array is rather old, dates back to the tr1::array times, with updates. I bet we simply overlooked this issue, in terms of QoI. Daniel, can you see other op

[Bug target/53250] New: [4.8 Regression] [SH] ICE: in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2018

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53250 Bug #: 53250 Summary: [4.8 Regression] [SH] ICE: in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2018 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/53251] New: template keyword ignored between -> and member under name collision with non-member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53251 Bug #: 53251 Summary: template keyword ignored between -> and member under name collision with non-member Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Sta

[Bug c++/53251] template keyword ignored between -> and member under name collision with non-member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53251 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-06 01:04:58 UTC --- Related to PR 11814 .

[Bug c++/53251] template keyword ignored between -> and member under name collision with non-member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53251 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-06 01:06:00 UTC --- And PR 10200 .

[Bug c/37303] const compound initializers in structs are written to .data instead of .rodata

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37303 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-06 01:10:39 UTC --- This test fails on MIPS because the section is rdata rather than rodata.

[Bug rtl-optimization/53252] New: Missed shrink wrapping opportunity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53252 Bug #: 53252 Summary: Missed shrink wrapping opportunity Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/53253] New: Missed opportunity to inline memcmp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53253 Bug #: 53253 Summary: Missed opportunity to inline memcmp Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/53254] New: Missed opportunity to aggregate consecutive stores into single larger store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53254 Bug #: 53254 Summary: Missed opportunity to aggregate consecutive stores into single larger store Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: U

[Bug c/27214] The C frontend introduces undefined pointer overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27214 Rich Felker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugdal at aerifal dot cx --- Comment #11 fr

[Bug c/39044] -Wformat warns on printf() with stringpointer as sole argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39044 Rich Felker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugdal at aerifal dot cx --- Comment #5 fro

[Bug tree-optimization/53253] Missed opportunity to inline memcmp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53253 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/19726] suboptimal constructor generated, consecutive stores should be done in a biggest mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19726 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #4 from

[Bug tree-optimization/53253] Missed opportunity to inline memcmp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53253 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-06 04:55:21 UTC --- Related also to PR 12086.

[Bug tree-optimization/53254] Missed opportunity to aggregate consecutive stores into single larger store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53254 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/52171] memcmp/strcmp/strncmp can be optimized when the result is tested for [in]equality with 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-06 04:55:13 UTC --- This really sounds like the same as PR 12086.

[Bug rtl-optimization/53252] Missed shrink wrapping opportunity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53252 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|