http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52684
--- Comment #6 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-02 07:01:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 27283
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27283
Simplest test case. Build with -O1 -ffloat-store -m64 on sparc
This is the most simplest t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52684
--- Comment #7 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-02 07:01:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 27284
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27284
DSE debugging dump of t1.c testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53160
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-02
07:13:54 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 2 07:13:49 2012
New Revision: 187035
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187035
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/53160
* ree.c (combine_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53160
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-02
07:19:46 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 2 07:19:41 2012
New Revision: 187036
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187036
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/53160
* ree.c (combine_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53160
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52684
--- Comment #8 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-02 07:23:56 UTC ---
I can't see how the current DSE code can properly handle this case, and I'm
surprised this doesn't trigger more often.
The outgoing args are stored to offsets of FRAME_POINTE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53186
Bug #: 53186
Summary: [C++11] missing devirtualization for operators "final"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49488
--- Comment #6 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-05-02 08:00:07 UTC ---
it looks to me that it is not effective with operators (see PR53186)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52684
--- Comment #9 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-02 08:09:46 UTC ---
Ok, after further study, I think I'm going to propose to fix this in DSE as
follows.
When we see a CALL in dse.c:scan_insn(), if FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM ==
ARG_POINTER_REGNUN th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53187
Bug #: 53187
Summary: ICE in arm_select_dominance_cc_mode
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Sev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30318
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-05-02 08:21:57 UTC ---
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012, marc.glisse at normalesup dot org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30318
>
> --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse
> 2012-04-28 13:18:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53177
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53188
Bug #: 53188
Summary: libatomic error: Please use exactly Autoconf 2.64
instead of 2.69
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53178
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53187
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53187
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-02
09:50:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 27285
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27285
gcc48-pr53187.patch
Untested fix. If combine puts there (*:SI (reg:CC* cc) (const_int 0)) we
should
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53163
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-02
09:55:36 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 2 09:55:32 2012
New Revision: 187038
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187038
Log:
PR tree-optimization/53163
* tree-ssa-phiop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53163
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-02
09:56:43 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 2 09:56:39 2012
New Revision: 187039
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187039
Log:
PR tree-optimization/53163
* tree-ssa-phiop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53163
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53174
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53168
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53167
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53150
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53189
Bug #: 53189
Summary: DImode and/or/not/xor optimized poorly in
core-registers
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53149
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38785
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.4 |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53145
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53143
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53144
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53142
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53185
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53184
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53150
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53189
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Stubbs 2012-05-02 11:25:35
UTC ---
I do mean "anddi3" not "adddi3" in the description. :(
My fingers have bad habits ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53188
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53185
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
Summary|segmentation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53174
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53039
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53183
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53182
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53180
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
Summary|Revision 1863
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53177
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
Summary|20_util/funct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53144
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-02
12:17:48 UTC ---
We are repeatedly inserting
Inserted pretmp.34_83 = MEM[(unsigned char *)&uc0];
in predecessor 2
causing insert iteration. Reproduces with -fno-tree-partial-pre, too, so a
regul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51267
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53190
Bug #: 53190
Summary: CSE (?) CSEs asms
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53190
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-02
12:47:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 27287
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27287
preprocessed source
Preprocessed source from glibc test-ifloat testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52864
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-02
12:51:55 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed May 2 12:51:49 2012
New Revision: 187044
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187044
Log:
2012-05-02 Tobias Burnus
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52864
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-02
12:53:24 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed May 2 12:53:20 2012
New Revision: 187046
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187046
Log:
2012-05-02 Tobias Burnus
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53153
--- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher 2012-05-02
12:57:17 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Wed May 2 12:57:10 2012
New Revision: 187048
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187048
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/53153
* gimplify.c (p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53153
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
I am surprised that this does not happen already at PRE :)
Without volatile attribute there is really nothing that prevents GCC from doing
this optimization
and unfortunately I don't think we provide way to prevent it without this big
hammer.
We have fpcr register defined for the control word th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51267
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka 2012-05-02 13:05:42
UTC ---
I am surprised that this does not happen already at PRE :)
Without volatile attribute there is really nothing that prevents GCC from doing
this optimization
and unfortunately I don't th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44174
zhou3 at lycos dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhou3 at lycos dot com
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53188
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53182
Eric Blake changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53144
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-02
14:08:18 UTC ---
I have a patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53174
--- Comment #4 from Paulo César Pereira de Andrade 2012-05-02 14:08:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created attachment 27286 [details]
> gcc48-pr53174.patch
>
> Untested fix.
Thanks. The patch corrects the ICE and builds the package.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53191
Bug #: 53191
Summary: [OOP] C614 (F2003) or C618 (F2008) not implemented for
class expressions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602
--- Comment #13 from Andi Kleen 2012-05-02
14:23:57 UTC ---
This still happens with a recent 4.7 and bites 32bit Linux kernel builds badly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30318
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse 2012-05-02
14:33:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2012, marc.glisse at normalesup dot org wrote:
> > I find it easier to use bignum and wrap at the end, instead of checking for
> > each operatio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53093
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2012-05-02 14:34:02 UTC
---
> > > > Does the aliases behave sanely with emutls?
> > > How do I tell?
> > Honestly I hoped you will know. Emutls is not my area.
>
> I should have mentioned that the other tests cove
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=phjGxHn3uKU
To unsubscribe please send email to unsubscr...@cc.psd-prahova.ro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53173
--- Comment #6 from gcc 2012-05-02 14:53:25 UTC
---
Thanks for the point, Jonathan ! I will make changes accordingly in our code.
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > 4. error: no matching function for call to ‘make_pair(std::
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53168
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602
--- Comment #15 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-05-02 15:18:53 UTC ---
This one is nicer (compiles without warnings):
typedef __u32;
typedef (*initcall_t) ();
struct IO_APIC_route_entry {
__u32 dest;
}
;
struct syscore_ops {
int (*suspend) ();
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53192
Bug #: 53192
Summary: Incorrect arguments to AVX2's gather intrinsics
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53192
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53178
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-05-02
15:57:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Is this problem also present in more recent Solaris releases?
It's gone as of Solaris 10 (the macros have the necessary casts), but I don't
have a 9 sys
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53193
Bug #: 53193
Summary: [4.7 Regression]
23_containers/unordered_set/instantiation_neg.cc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29442
Gašper Ažman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gasper.azman at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53193
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-05-02 16:33:11
UTC ---
It needs to update error line.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530
--- Comment #5 from Luke Dalessandro 2012-05-02
16:50:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 27288
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27288
Preprocessed RBTree microbenchmark from RSTM that triggers this bug.
I'm still seeing this bug wi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530
--- Comment #6 from Luke Dalessandro 2012-05-02
16:52:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created attachment 27288 [details]
> Preprocessed RBTree microbenchmark from RSTM that triggers this bug.
>
> [snip]
>
> I will reopen pr47530, but if s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29442
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53188
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-02
16:56:09 UTC ---
>./contrib/gcc_update for svn trees,
it also works correctly for git trees too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52866
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46779
--- Comment #17 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-05-02
17:05:10 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed May 2 17:05:04 2012
New Revision: 187055
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187055
Log:
Backport from 2011-07-08 4.6-branch r176055.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46779
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.4
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53190
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-02
17:09:02 UTC ---
(clobber (reg:QI 18 fpsr))
(clobber (reg:QI 17 flags))
It might clobber those but that is not considered an use. So CSE is doing the
correct thing as there i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52740
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52447
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39633
--- Comment #15 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-05-02
17:14:42 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed May 2 17:14:32 2012
New Revision: 187056
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187056
Log:
Backport from 2011-07-11 4.6-branch r176143
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53175
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-02
17:15:33 UTC ---
As I have not clearly mentioned it before, there exist the following
workarounds:
a) Make "dim" *not* PRIVATE. ("dim" can be marked as PROTECTED to avoid
unwanted changes.) That might
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39633
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.4
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53193
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53193
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-02 17:16:43 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed May 2 17:16:33 2012
New Revision: 187057
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187057
Log:
2012-05-02 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53184
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2012-05-02
17:23:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Because then the anonymous class has the name "Foo" for linkage purposes, and
> has external linkage. When Foo referes to the const or volatile qualified
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45263
--- Comment #16 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-05-02
17:23:14 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed May 2 17:23:06 2012
New Revision: 187058
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187058
Log:
Backport from 2011-05-30 4.6-branch r174427.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53190
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45263
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to work|4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50820
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-05-02
17:37:36 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed May 2 17:37:31 2012
New Revision: 187059
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187059
Log:
Backport from 2011-10-21 4.6-branch 180303.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50820
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.4
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53194
Bug #: 53194
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Many x86 failures
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53196
Bug #: 53196
Summary: unknown struct name in C99 compound initializer
doesn't generate error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53194
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-05-02 17:55:50
UTC ---
The same failures happens on both ia32 and x86-64.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2012-05-02 17:58:17
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Lower-subreg is most likely a terrible transformation to do on later x86s but
> is likely to have been useful on the earlier ones. So this regression is
> li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53197
Bug #: 53197
Summary: [4.8 Regression] bootstrap failure on Linux/ia32
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
