http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53156
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-04-29
07:00:16 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Sun Apr 29 07:00:01 2012
New Revision: 186941
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186941
Log:
PR target/53156
* gcc.target/cris/peep2-a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53156
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig 2012-04-29
07:12:10 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Apr 29 07:12:03 2012
New Revision: 186942
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186942
Log:
2012-04-29 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/53148
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53100
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2012-04-29
08:05:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> It would be convenient if I
> could just write the whole code with __int128 and let the compiler do the
> optimization by tracking the range of numbers.
The t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53112
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53100
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2012-04-29
08:42:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> On the other hand, tree-vrp does have the information that the
> differences are in [-4294967295, 4294967295], which comfortably fits in a type
> half the size
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22200
--- Comment #42 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-29 09:25:24 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Apr 29 09:25:17 2012
New Revision: 186944
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186944
Log:
2012-04-29 Marc Glisse
PR libst
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53149
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-29
09:47:47 UTC ---
Author: manu
Date: Sun Apr 29 09:47:43 2012
New Revision: 186945
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186945
Log:
2012-04-29 Manuel López-Ibáñez
PR 5314
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53149
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-29
10:01:41 UTC ---
Hi Hans-Peter, could you try with the latest revision? I believe this is fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51625
Yichao Zhou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||broken.zhou at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48891
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse 2012-04-29
13:15:40 UTC ---
I don't think it matters that much whether the return type is int or bool,
compared to the inconvenience of having 2 functions that conflict.
The constexpr qualifier is nice, but not re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53159
Bug #: 53159
Summary: Missing narrowing check
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53089
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51312
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse 2012-04-29
14:12:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 27261
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27261
build_enumerator patch
Changes the behavior on g++.dg/cpp0x/enum_base.C from an error to a warning in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53157
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53145
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-04-29 16:23:05
UTC ---
This fixes the regression. But I don't see why it should make
a difference.
diff --git a/gcc/common.opt b/gcc/common.opt
index 14c88bf..cd760fc 100644
--- a/gcc/common.opt
+++ b/gcc/common
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53145
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-04-29 16:29:27
UTC ---
/* Return a heap allocated producer string including command line options
if -grecord-gcc-switches. */
static char *
gen_producer_string (void)
{
size_t j;
VEC(dchar_p, heap) *switc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41969
travnick changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikolajmm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53160
Bug #: 53160
Summary: likely wrong code bug
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53160
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-* i?86-*-*
Component|c
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: dcb...@hotmail.com
I just tried to compile the package luminance-hdr-2.2.1-3
on gcc-4.8 trunk dated 20120429 on an AMD x86_64 box.
The compiler said
/home/dcb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53161
--- Comment #1 from dcb 2012-04-29 20:15:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 27262
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27262
gzipped C++ source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53161
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-29
20:23:59 UTC ---
Reducing ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52684
--- Comment #1 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-29 20:48:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 27263
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27263
Testcase distilled from glibc's math/libm-test.inc compare_float_internal()
This is distill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51625
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52684
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51795
--- Comment #30 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-29 23:36:15 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Apr 29 23:36:09 2012
New Revision: 186948
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186948
Log:
2012-04-29 Marc Glisse
Paolo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51795
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
It doesn't help to attach this into a closed bugreport. LTO allows GCC to do a
lot more transformations
and sometime the transformations hurts the final performance. This is a bug and
we will try to fix it.
>From information you gave it is however impossible to guess what may possibly
>go wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41969
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka 2012-04-30 00:39:08 UTC
---
It doesn't help to attach this into a closed bugreport. LTO allows GCC to do a
lot more transformations
and sometime the transformations hurts the final performance. This is a bug and
w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53162
Bug #: 53162
Summary: unexpanded parameter packs not diagnosed in alias
template used in default argument
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53028
--- Comment #11 from Mike Stump 2012-04-30
01:08:24 UTC ---
>> also don't test that the warning goes away with -w. We don't test the
>> warning
>> turns into an error with -Werror.
>
> Don't we?
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53149
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38412
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Version|4.3.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53161
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
.8.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --with-libelf=/usr/local --enable-lto
--prefix=/home/regehr/z/compiler-install/gcc-r186946-install
--program-prefix=r186946- --enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20120429 (experimental) (GCC)
37 matches
Mail list logo