[Bug c++/53150] New: g++ crashes if struct member initializer references to local variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53150 Bug #: 53150 Summary: g++ crashes if struct member initializer references to local variable Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/53151] New: [C++11] Incorrect type deduction in conditional expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53151 Bug #: 53151 Summary: [C++11] Incorrect type deduction in conditional expression Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/53151] [C++11] Incorrect type deduction in conditional expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53151 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-28 03:46:11 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53000

[Bug c++/53151] [C++11] Incorrect type deduction in conditional expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53151 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53000] Conditional operator does not behave as standardized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53000 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zeratul976 at hotmail dot

[Bug middle-end/53144] [4.8 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/vector-compare-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53144 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Bonzini 2012-04-28 06:19:31 UTC --- In the case of PR53138 this was a preexisting bug in handling -(a < b), made more explicit by the new phi-opt conversion. Looking at vector-compare-1.c and pass ordering (phiopt runs

[Bug c++/53152] New: In "no match for operatorXX" error message, mention the types of the arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53152 Bug #: 53152 Summary: In "no match for operatorXX" error message, mention the types of the arguments Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug tree-optimization/53128] [4.8 Regression] Compiler produces infinite loop on regular O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53128 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-04-27 08:02:39 UTC --- On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53128 > > Alexander Monakov changed: > >What|Remove

[Bug regression/53130] [4.8 Regression]: gcc.dg/20011021-1.c, gcc.dg/m-un-2.c, gcc.dg/missing-field-init-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53130 --- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-27 08:22:01 UTC --- Author: manu Date: Fri Apr 27 08:21:49 2012 New Revision: 186896 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186896 Log: 2012-04-25 Manuel López-Ibáñez PR c/53

[Bug regression/53130] [4.8 Regression]: gcc.dg/20011021-1.c, gcc.dg/m-un-2.c, gcc.dg/missing-field-init-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53130 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug driver/53002] Request new specs string token for multilib_os_dir

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53002 Steven Drake changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27163|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug driver/53002] Request new specs string token for multilib_os_dir

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53002 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/53136] New: Use after free in ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target, cxx_printable_name_internal problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53136 Bug #: 53136 Summary: Use after free in ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target, cxx_printable_name_internal problem Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 S

[Bug target/53133] XOR AL,AL to zero lower 8 bits of EAX/RAX causes partial register stall (Intel Core 2)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53133 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53137] New: g++ segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53137 Bug #: 53137 Summary: g++ segfault Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/51213] [C++11][DR 1170] Access control checking has to be done under SFINAE conditions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-04-27 09:26:39 UTC --- Yes, in a few areas the 4.7.x library is much closer to the letter of C++11 in terms of constraining, and of course we never did access control under sfinae. Note that the latter, bein

[Bug target/53138] New: [4.7/4.8 Regression] spaceship operator miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53138 Bug #: 53138 Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] spaceship operator miscompiled Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug target/53138] [4.7/4.8 Regression] spaceship operator miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53138 Paolo Bonzini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53139] New: internal compiler error: expected a type, got '#'tree_vec' not supported by dump_expr#'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53139 Bug #: 53139 Summary: internal compiler error: expected a type, got '#'tree_vec' not supported by dump_expr#' Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug target/53134] Request for option to disable excess precision on i387

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53134 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-04-27 10:23:42 UTC --- On Fri, 27 Apr 2012, bugdal at aerifal dot cx wrote: > Since even with the precision mode set correctly the exponent range of 387 fpu > registers still matches that of

[Bug c/53140] New: Add support for vector of complex numbers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53140 Bug #: 53140 Summary: Add support for vector of complex numbers Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c++/53139] internal compiler error: expected a type, got '#'tree_vec' not supported by dump_expr#'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53139 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marc.glisse at normalesup

[Bug target/53134] Request for option to disable excess precision on i387

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53134 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-04-27 10:26:22 UTC --- See also what I said in : The option naming leaves open the possibility of other options such as "non

[Bug middle-end/27139] Optimize double INT->FP->INT conversions with -ffast-math

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27139 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-27 10:34:18 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Apr 27 10:34:13 2012 New Revision: 186898 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186898 Log: 2012-04-27 Marc Glisse PR middle-end/2

[Bug c/53140] Add support for vector of complex numbers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53140 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53139] internal compiler error: expected a type, got '#'tree_vec' not supported by dump_expr#'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53139 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/53138] [4.7/4.8 Regression] spaceship operator miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53138 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.1

[Bug c++/53137] [4.7/4.8 Regression] g++ segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53137 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Status

[Bug c/51527] ICE: Segmentation fault: 'convert_to_integer' enters infinite recursion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51527 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-04-27 10:52:03 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Apr 27 10:51:58 2012 New Revision: 186899 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186899 Log: PR c/51527 * convert.c (convert_to_integer

[Bug c/51527] ICE: Segmentation fault: 'convert_to_integer' enters infinite recursion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51527 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/53139] internal compiler error: expected a type, got '#'tree_vec' not supported by dump_expr#'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53139 --- Comment #3 from niXman 2012-04-27 11:08:17 UTC --- with 4.7-branch rev-186846 and trunk rev-186841 - everything is ok.

[Bug c++/53139] internal compiler error: expected a type, got '#'tree_vec' not supported by dump_expr#'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53139 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/53134] Request for option to disable excess precision on i387

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53134 --- Comment #6 from Rich Felker 2012-04-27 11:51:05 UTC --- Joseph, you're right, and I don't see any way to handle the denormal issue without really ugly and much slower wrapper code around each op...

[Bug middle-end/53093] [4.8 Regression]: tls/alias-1.c ICE, emutls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53093 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2012-04-27 12:03:00 UTC --- > > Does the aliases behave sanely with emutls? > > How do I tell? Honestly I hoped you will know. Emutls is not my area. I will try to play with it on i386 target. Should not be too

[Bug target/53138] [4.7/4.8 Regression] spaceship operator miscompiled

R target/53138 * config/i386/i386.md (x86_movcc_0_m1_neg): Add clobber. testsuite: 2012-04-27 Paolo Bonzini PR target/53138 * gcc.c-torture/execute/20120427-1.c: New testcase. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20120427-1.c Modified: trunk/gcc/C

[Bug target/53124] Arm NEON narrowing right shift instructions impose incorrect operand bounds (intrinsic and asm)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53124 --- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw 2012-04-27 12:25:06 UTC --- Just for the record, I've confirmed with the Assembler Guide team that there is a documentation fault in that document. It will be clarified in a future release.

[Bug fortran/53035] ICE with deferred-length module variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53035 --- Comment #6 from Norman S. Clerman 2012-04-27 12:50:47 UTC --- Hello, Thanks to everyone for following up on this. I was very used to seeing messages that deferred length characters are not yet supported. Therefore, when I saw the internal

[Bug middle-end/53093] [4.8 Regression]: tls/alias-1.c ICE, emutls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53093 --- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-04-27 13:15:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > > > Does the aliases behave sanely with emutls? > > How do I tell? > Honestly I hoped you will know. Emutls is not my area. I should have mentioned tha

[Bug c++/12076] gcov misreports coverage of return statement [NRV]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12076 Paul Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||darkraver at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug rtl-optimization/53141] New: [4.8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/bmi2-mulx32-[12]a.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53141 Bug #: 53141 Summary: [4.8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/bmi2-mulx32-[12]a.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/53142] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr52283.c (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53142 Bug #: 53142 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr52283.c (test for excess errors) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c++/52538] Extend C++11 UDLs to be compatible with inttypes.h macros

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52538 --- Comment #3 from Ollie Wild 2012-04-27 14:29:39 UTC --- Author: aaw Date: Fri Apr 27 14:29:32 2012 New Revision: 186909 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186909 Log: Add new option, -Wliteral-suffix. This option, which is

[Bug rtl-optimization/53141] [4.8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/bmi2-mulx32-[12]a.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53141 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel 2012-04-27 14:32:23 UTC --- That's because reload now will try with swapped operands before going to the next alternative. So now the first alternative will be used instead of the second. This matches the beha

[Bug rtl-optimization/53141] [4.8 Regression] gcc.target/i386/bmi2-mulx32-[12]a.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53141 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel 2012-04-27 14:47:15 UTC --- Created attachment 27252 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27252 Patch proposal This patch should bring back the old behavior.

[Bug libitm/53008] abort in _ITM_getTMCloneSafe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53008 Patrick Marlier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||patrick.marlier at gmail

[Bug other/53143] New: [4.8 Regression] ' in c_tree_printer, at c-objc-common.c:136

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53143 Bug #: 53143 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ' in c_tree_printer, at c-objc-common.c:136 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug go/52358] math FAILs on Solaris 8 and 9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52358 --- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-27 16:32:50 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Fri Apr 27 16:32:42 2012 New Revision: 186913 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186913 Log: PR go/52358 math: Work around bug in Sol

[Bug go/52358] math FAILs on Solaris 8 and 9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52358 --- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-27 16:33:14 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Fri Apr 27 16:33:01 2012 New Revision: 186914 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186914 Log: PR go/52358 math: Work around bug in Sol

[Bug go/52358] math FAILs on Solaris 8 and 9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52358 --- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-27 16:38:37 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Fri Apr 27 16:38:31 2012 New Revision: 186916 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186916 Log: PR go/52358 configure, runtime: Provide

[Bug go/52358] math FAILs on Solaris 8 and 9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52358 --- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-27 16:38:19 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Fri Apr 27 16:38:11 2012 New Revision: 186915 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186915 Log: PR go/52358 configure, runtime: Provide

[Bug go/52360] time and net/http FAIL on Solaris 8 and 9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52360 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/53144] New: [4.8 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/vector-compare-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53144 Bug #: 53144 Summary: [4.8 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/vector-compare-1.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug go/52583] Several new go testsuite failues on Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED --- Comment #22 from Ian Lan

[Bug go/52358] math FAILs on Solaris 8 and 9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52358 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52538] Extend C++11 UDLs to be compatible with inttypes.h macros

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52538 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey Yasskin 2012-04-27 17:47:30 UTC --- Is this ok for gcc-4_7-branch too? The other bug reports Jonathan mentioned won't be helped by a fix that skips 4.7.

[Bug debug/53145] New: [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/pch/save-temps-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53145 Bug #: 53145 Summary: [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/pch/save-temps-1.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug middle-end/53142] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr52283.c (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53142 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2012-04-27 18:52:44 UTC --- Breakpoint 1, c_tree_printer (pp=0x8001002055b8, text=0x83fffdff1208, spec=0x8001001c0dc9 "T", precision=0, wide=0 '\000', set_locus=0 '\000', hash=0 '\000') at

[Bug middle-end/53142] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr52283.c (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53142 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2012-04-27 18:56:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Oops, ignore last comment. It was for different PR.

[Bug other/53143] [4.8 Regression] ' in c_tree_printer, at c-objc-common.c:136

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53143 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2012-04-27 19:06:48 UTC --- Seems to be caused by the following decl: Breakpoint 1, c_tree_printer (pp=0x8001002055b8, text=0x83fffdff1208, spec=0x8001001c0dc9 "T", precision=0, wide=0 '\000'

[Bug other/53143] [4.8 Regression] ' in c_tree_printer, at c-objc-common.c:136

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53143 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug other/53143] [4.8 Regression] ' in c_tree_printer, at c-objc-common.c:136

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53143 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-04-27 19:24:24 UTC --- On 4/27/2012 3:18 PM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Can you try with the latest revision? I think I fixed this already. Ok, I'll give it a try.

[Bug c/53146] New: switch statement compiling wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53146 Bug #: 53146 Summary: switch statement compiling wrong code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/53146] switch statement compiling wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53146 --- Comment #1 from Erik Thiele 2012-04-27 19:54:00 UTC --- Created attachment 27254 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27254 source code to demonstrate problem

[Bug target/53146] switch statement compiling wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53146 --- Comment #2 from Erik Thiele 2012-04-27 19:55:49 UTC --- run the shell script to compile the source and transfer it to an atmega8 attached to a stk500 programmer. if you read the sourcecode you see, it should end in an endless loop. instead

[Bug target/53146] switch statement compiling wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53146 --- Comment #3 from Erik Thiele 2012-04-27 20:01:04 UTC --- Created attachment 27255 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27255 collection of output files created by shellscript to show invalid code.

[Bug target/52999] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE, segmentation fault in c_tree_printer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52999 --- Comment #11 from John David Anglin 2012-04-27 20:41:22 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Fri Apr 27 20:41:16 2012 New Revision: 186919 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186919 Log: PR target/52999 * config/pa/pa.c (pa

[Bug middle-end/53147] New: [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc apparently miscompiles clang-3.1(or trunk)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53147 Bug #: 53147 Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc apparently miscompiles clang-3.1(or trunk) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/53147] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc apparently miscompiles clang-3.1(or trunk)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53147 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-04-27 21:17:11 UTC --- BTW the original clang bug can be found here: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11926 And this is a RedHat bug report of the same issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu

[Bug middle-end/53147] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc apparently miscompiles clang-3.1(or trunk)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53147 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-27 21:24:33 UTC --- According to the redhat bug, it is a bug in clang with respect of strict-aliasing.

[Bug middle-end/53147] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc apparently miscompiles clang-3.1(or trunk)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53147 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-04-27 21:27:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > According to the redhat bug, it is a bug in clang with respect of > strict-aliasing. No. That was a red herring. clang explicitly uses -fno-strict-ali

[Bug libfortran/53148] New: [gcc/gfortran-4.7.0 Regression] Incorrect intrinsic function parsing on labeled statements when compiled w/optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53148 Bug #: 53148 Summary: [gcc/gfortran-4.7.0 Regression] Incorrect intrinsic function parsing on labeled statements when compiled w/optimization Classification: Unclassified

[Bug testsuite/53028] add dg-pedantic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53028 --- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-28 00:02:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > also don't test that the warning goes away with -w. We don't test the warning > turns into an error with -Werror. Don't we? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/g

[Bug target/53146] switch statement compiling wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53146 Erik Thiele changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/40989] -Werror= and #pragma diagnostics do not work with group flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40989 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||53063 --- Comment #7 from Manuel Ló

[Bug c/53072] automatically set Init() only if option was not set in some other way

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53072 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-28 00:17:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > > It may be possible - you'd need to avoid implicit setting marking the > implied option as "set" - and I don't think delaying processing of Init()

[Bug middle-end/53144] [4.8 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/vector-compare-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53144 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug regression/53130] [4.8 Regression]: gcc.dg/20011021-1.c, gcc.dg/m-un-2.c, gcc.dg/missing-field-init-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53130 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-04-28 00:32:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > FIXED. No; gcc.dg/20011021-1.c didn't actually pass after your changes, there's a missing warning. I'll clone this PR, as it's supposedly a separate i

[Bug regression/53149] New: [4.8 Regression]: gcc.dg/20011021-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53149 Bug #: 53149 Summary: [4.8 Regression]: gcc.dg/20011021-1.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity

[Bug regression/53149] [4.8 Regression]: gcc.dg/20011021-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53149 --- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-28 01:28:13 UTC --- Doh, I was testing a revision before my commit. Anyway, the testcase just needs adjusting. I will do that as soon as an up-to-date version finishes bootstrapping.

[Bug tree-optimization/38785] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] huge performance regression on EEMBC bitmnp01

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38785 --- Comment #30 from Maxim Kuvyrkov 2012-04-28 01:56:59 UTC --- Author: mkuvyrkov Date: Sat Apr 28 01:56:54 2012 New Revision: 186928 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186928 Log: PR tree-optimization/38785 * common.o

[Bug tree-optimization/38785] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] huge performance regression on EEMBC bitmnp01

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38785 Maxim Kuvyrkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|