[Bug go/52586] libgo fails to build for mips*64-linux-gnu (reference to undefined name 'SYS_GETDENTS64')

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52586 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-20 07:48:52 UTC --- Fails still as of today: /home/apinski/src/gcc-fsf/local/gcc/libgo/go/syscall/libcall_linux.go:206:26: error: reference to undefined name 'SYS_GETDENTS64' r1, _, errno := Syscall(SYS

[Bug go/52586] libgo fails to build for mips*64-linux-gnu (reference to undefined name 'SYS_GETDENTS64')

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52586 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-20 07:52:10 UTC --- SYS_getdents64 does not exist for either N32 or N64 with the version of glibc I have.

[Bug target/43533] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap fails with GNU as and ld 2.20

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43533 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/46776] gogo-tree.cc uses TRAMPOLINE_ALIGNMENT and TRAMPOLINE_SIZE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46776 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libfortran/53051] I/O: Support reading floating-point numbers which use "Q" for the exponent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53051 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/53052] New: [C++11] is_explicitly_convertible still part of header

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53052 Bug #: 53052 Summary: [C++11] is_explicitly_convertible still part of header Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug libstdc++/53052] [C++11] is_explicitly_convertible still part of header

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53052 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53039] [4.7/4.8 Regression] including breaks std::is_convertible with template-pack expansion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53039 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|hjl.tools at gmail dot com | --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2012-

[Bug c++/53050] ssa_forward_propagate_and_combine: segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53050 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/53053] New: code-gen (missing loop-termination test) bug introduced between April 18 and April 19th

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53053 Bug #: 53053 Summary: code-gen (missing loop-termination test) bug introduced between April 18 and April 19th Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/53049] expand/TER unappropriate moving unspec volatile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53049 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-20 09:20:44 UTC --- It's not easy to restrict movement in this case (and no other tree transform would bother). Consider sinking and void test2 (unsigned val, bool flag) { val = 65535U / val; __

[Bug middle-end/53046] [4.8 Regression] New libstdc++ test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53046 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/53048] [4.8 Regression] 256.bzip2 in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53048 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/53045] Missing loop termination

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53045 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/53047] [4.8 Regression] 482.sphinx3 in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53047 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/53045] Missing loop termination

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53045 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-20 09:24:06 UTC --- Btw, see how I fixed 2012-04-18 Richard Guenther * gcc.target/x86_64/abi/test_passing_unions.c: Avoid undefined array access. * gcc.target/x86_64/abi/te

[Bug c/53053] code-gen (missing loop-termination test) bug introduced between April 18 and April 19th

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53053 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/53040] nested functions may trash floating point registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53040 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra 2012-04-20 09:33:23 UTC --- Author: amodra Date: Fri Apr 20 09:33:19 2012 New Revision: 186616 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186616 Log: PR target/53040 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6

[Bug libstdc++/53052] [C++11] is_explicitly_convertible still part of header

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53052 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-20 09:39:25 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Apr 20 09:39:17 2012 New Revision: 186617 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186617 Log: 2012-04-20 Paolo Carlini PR libs

[Bug libstdc++/53052] [C++11] is_explicitly_convertible still part of header

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53052 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-20 09:39:41 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Apr 20 09:39:29 2012 New Revision: 186618 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186618 Log: 2012-04-20 Paolo Carlini PR libs

[Bug libstdc++/53052] [C++11] is_explicitly_convertible still part of header

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53052 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53050] ssa_forward_propagate_and_combine: segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53050 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-20 10:17:54 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Apr 20 10:17:46 2012 New Revision: 186620 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186620 Log: 2012-04-20 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug bootstrap/53054] New: [4.8 Regression] bootstrap failure on x86-64 after rev 186609

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53054 Bug #: 53054 Summary: [4.8 Regression] bootstrap failure on x86-64 after rev 186609 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/53050] ssa_forward_propagate_and_combine: segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53050 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/53054] [4.8 Regression] bootstrap failure on x86-64 after rev 186609

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53054 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53039] [4.7/4.8 Regression] including breaks std::is_convertible with template-pack expansion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53039 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2012-04-20 10:27:11 UTC --- Eh, this is *not* a library issue: #include #if 1 template class tuple { template...>::value>::type> tuple(_UElements&&...); }; #else template class tup

[Bug c/53053] code-gen (missing loop-termination test) bug introduced between April 18 and April 19th

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53053 --- Comment #2 from jim at meyering dot net 2012-04-20 10:28:35 UTC --- when I add printf ("%u\n", i); before the end of the loop, it prints values up to about 128K before segfaulting.

[Bug c/53053] code-gen (missing loop-termination test) bug introduced between April 18 and April 19th

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53053 --- Comment #3 from jim at meyering dot net 2012-04-20 10:43:28 UTC --- Created attachment 27201 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27201 preprocessed source PS, gcc was built via this: CC=/usr/bin/gcc ./configure --prefix=$prefix

[Bug c/53053] code-gen (missing loop-termination test) bug introduced between April 18 and April 19th

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53053 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug c/53053] code-gen (missing loop-termination test) bug introduced between April 18 and April 19th

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53053 --- Comment #5 from jim at meyering dot net 2012-04-20 11:23:21 UTC --- Oh! I'm not used to seeing this sort of transformation (invalid code -> effectively-skipped loop-termination test), but it certainly makes sense, given an invalid input. Than

[Bug c/53053] code-gen (missing loop-termination test) bug introduced between April 18 and April 19th

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53053 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/53021] [4.8 Regression] bootstrap failure on Linux/ia32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53021 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-04-20 12:20:07 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Apr 20 12:19:51 2012 New Revision: 186623 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186623 Log: PR bootstrap/53021 * alias.h (UNIQUE_BASE_V

[Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-20 12:29:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > However, it yields a segfault at runtime (-fdump-tree-original shows that > 'test2' is used in both calls). Related to this, it also shows that t

[Bug c++/53039] [4.7/4.8 Regression] including breaks std::is_convertible with template-pack expansion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53039 --- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini 2012-04-20 12:37:33 UTC --- So, the below is my final pure C++ testcase: if 1 is changed to 0 the code compiles; likewise if 1 and 0 are swapped. Thus, it seems there is something wrong in global front-end data

[Bug rtl-optimization/44214] Compiler does not optimize vector divide with -freciprocal-math (or -ffast-math)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44214 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|una

[Bug c++/33925] gcc -Waddress lost some useful warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33925 --- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-20 12:57:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > ... That's not an argument against improving the warning though. GCC's uses > occur in system headers so warnings are suppressed, and could be worked

[Bug tree-optimization/52891] [4.8 Regression] ICE in adjust_bool_pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52891 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/52008] [C++0x] ICE when adding partial specialization for variadic-templated structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52008 Michal Malecki changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c++/53055] New: ICE in cp_build_indirect_ref, at cp/typeck.c:2836

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 Bug #: 53055 Summary: ICE in cp_build_indirect_ref, at cp/typeck.c:2836 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/53055] ICE in cp_build_indirect_ref, at cp/typeck.c:2836

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-20 14:08:31 UTC --- Created attachment 27204 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27204 unincluded testcase 4.4 rejects it: part-combine-iterator.cc: In member function 'virtual void P

[Bug rtl-optimization/44214] Compiler does not optimize vector divide with -freciprocal-math (or -ffast-math)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44214 --- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt 2012-04-20 14:19:23 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Fri Apr 20 14:19:13 2012 New Revision: 186625 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186625 Log: gcc: 2012-04-20 Bill Schmidt PR rt

[Bug rtl-optimization/44214] Compiler does not optimize vector divide with -freciprocal-math (or -ffast-math)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44214 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53055] ICE in cp_build_indirect_ref, at cp/typeck.c:2836

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marc.glisse at normalesup

[Bug c++/53055] ICE in cp_build_indirect_ref, at cp/typeck.c:2836

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 --- Comment #3 from Launchpad 2012-04-20 14:44:50 UTC --- David Kastrup added the following comment to Launchpad bug report 984577: Just for the record: the source code triggering the error is invalid C++. It is just that an internal compiler e

[Bug target/43249] unsigned int arg with no prototype gets full 64-bit reg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43249 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug lto/42534] ICE with -flto when using __attribute__((__aligned__(X)))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42534 --- Comment #3 from William J. Schmidt 2012-04-20 14:53:43 UTC --- No longer reproduces in 4.8.

[Bug bootstrap/53042] [4.8 Regression] AIX bootstrap: cgraph symbol table error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53042 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2012-04-20 14:59:20 UTC --- I am testing my variant of patch on x86_64-linux and intend to commit it if it passes.

[Bug bootstrap/53042] [4.8 Regression] AIX bootstrap: cgraph symbol table error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53042 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2012-04-20 15:18:45 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Fri Apr 20 15:18:39 2012 New Revision: 186627 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186627 Log: PR target/53042 * decl2.c (maybe_emit_vtabl

[Bug bootstrap/53042] [4.8 Regression] AIX bootstrap: cgraph symbol table error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53042 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53055] ICE in cp_build_indirect_ref, at cp/typeck.c:2836

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Status|UN

[Bug c++/52008] [C++0x] ICE when adding partial specialization for variadic-templated structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52008 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|SUSPENDED --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carli

[Bug tree-optimization/53045] Missing loop termination

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53045 --- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2012-04-20 16:13:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Btw, see how I fixed > > 2012-04-18 Richard Guenther > > * gcc.target/x86_64/abi/test_passing_unions.c: Avoid undefined > array access. >

[Bug middle-end/52997] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-intconst-1.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52997 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-04-20 17:18:05 UTC --- On 4/19/2012 10:21 AM, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Does this fix it? Yes. Thanks, Dave

[Bug target/51178] FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/builtin5.C scan-assembler _ZSt5atanhd

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51178 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm-none-eabi, |arm-none-eabi |arm-l

[Bug target/53056] New: bad code generated for ARM NEON with vector types in structs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53056 Bug #: 53056 Summary: bad code generated for ARM NEON with vector types in structs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/52878] [4.8 regression] bootstrap failure: "MASK_LONG_DOUBLE_128" redefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52878 --- Comment #15 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-04-20 20:15:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > Created attachment 27192 [details] > A patch > > Please try this patch. With this patch I'm able to bootstrap gcc-4.8-20120415 on sparc64-linux.

[Bug target/53056] bad code generated for ARM NEON with vector types in structs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53056 --- Comment #1 from D W 2012-04-20 20:16:35 UTC --- Also tested arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.8.0-svn186501. Same results.

[Bug target/53056] bad code generated for ARM NEON with vector types in structs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53056 --- Comment #2 from D W 2012-04-20 20:20:46 UTC --- Typo: add2 should be: vi16 add2(A a, A b) { vi16* av = &a.v; vi16* bv = &b.v; return *av + *bv; }

[Bug tree-optimization/52272] [4.7/4.8 regression] Performance regresswion of 410.bwaves on x86.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52272 --- Comment #12 from Michael Meissner 2012-04-20 23:15:56 UTC --- Created attachment 27205 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27205 ivtops dump from subversion id 183933 (before regression)

[Bug tree-optimization/52272] [4.7/4.8 regression] Performance regresswion of 410.bwaves on x86.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52272 --- Comment #13 from Michael Meissner 2012-04-20 23:16:24 UTC --- I'm attaching the ivopts dump from 4 runs: 1) Subversion id 183933, the revision before the change; 2) Subversion id 183934, the revision that slowed down bwaves; 3) Subversion id

[Bug tree-optimization/52272] [4.7/4.8 regression] Performance regresswion of 410.bwaves on x86.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52272 --- Comment #14 from Michael Meissner 2012-04-20 23:19:52 UTC --- Created attachment 27207 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27207 ivtops dump from subversion id 183934 (after regression)

[Bug tree-optimization/52272] [4.7/4.8 regression] Performance regresswion of 410.bwaves on x86.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52272 --- Comment #15 from Michael Meissner 2012-04-20 23:21:14 UTC --- Created attachment 27208 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27208 ivtops dump from subversion id 186630 (top of tree on April 20th, 2012)

[Bug tree-optimization/52272] [4.7/4.8 regression] Performance regresswion of 410.bwaves on x86.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52272 --- Comment #16 from Michael Meissner 2012-04-20 23:22:54 UTC --- Created attachment 27209 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27209 ivtops dump from subversion id 186630 + experimental patch from Igor Zamyatin

[Bug tree-optimization/50480] 10% performance regression on Spec2006 410.bwaves

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50480 --- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner 2012-04-20 23:17:44 UTC --- Created attachment 27206 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27206 ivtops dump from subversion id 183934 (after regression)

[Bug c++/52008] [C++0x] ICE when adding partial specialization for variadic-templated structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52008 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2012-04-21 01:46:29 UTC --- If you rewrite the test so that the two versions are both partial specializations: template struct tuple_sliced; template struct tuple_sliced { typedef typename tuple_sliced::t