http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu 2012-04-19 20:15:55
UTC ---
Created attachment 27197
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27197
A patch
I got
[hjl@gnu-6 pr53037]$ cat x.i
typedef unsigned long long __u64
__attribute__((aligned(4),wa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27197|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
--- Comment #14 from H. Peter Anvin 2012-04-19 20:24:25
UTC ---
Are the last two warnings in bits (as opposed to bytes)? It looks a little
confusing...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu 2012-04-19 20:41:47
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Are the last two warnings in bits (as opposed to bytes)? It looks a little
> confusing...
It is fixed by the updated patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu 2012-04-19 21:06:49
UTC ---
Created attachment 27199
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27199
A smaller patch
There is no point to support
struct foo
{
int i1;
long long i2 __attribute__((align
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51314
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2012-04-19
21:19:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 27200
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27200
patch
s.cc: In function 'void f(U ...)':
s.cc:3:18: error: 'sizeof...' argument must be surrounded by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53051
Bug #: 53051
Summary: I/O: Support reading floating-point numbers which use
"Q" for the exponent
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53046
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53039
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Krügler
2012-04-20 06:48:39 UTC ---
I'm pretty sure that this is not related with , but instead with
some interaction between the header and std::is_convertible. The
following variant still demonstrates the problem (I
101 - 110 of 110 matches
Mail list logo