http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52992
Bug #: 52992
Summary: Incorrect sprintf format in fixincludes/fixincl.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52973
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52871
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52976
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-04-15
10:42:36 UTC ---
> Patch bootstraps and passes regressions; ...
And also the polyhedron tests. Thanks.
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: dcb...@hotmail.com
I just tried to analyse the source code of gcc-4.8 trunk
dated 20120415 with the latest cppcheck-1.54.
It said
[libgomp/config/linux/lock.c:178]: (warning) Using size of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52994
Bug #: 52994
Summary: internal compiler error: in gfc_trans_assignment_1, at
fortran/trans-expr.c:6881
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52994
--- Comment #1 from Sylwester Arabas 2012-04-15
11:40:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 27159
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27159
Fortran source file with minimal example to reproduce the descibed behaviour
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51082
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-15 11:47:55 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Sun Apr 15 11:47:49 2012
New Revision: 186465
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186465
Log:
2012-04-15 Janus Weil
PR fortran/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51082
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50673
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig 2012-04-15
11:52:49 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Apr 15 11:52:44 2012
New Revision: 186466
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186466
Log:
2012-04-15 Thomas Koenig
PR libfortran/3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #18 from Thomas Koenig 2012-04-15
11:55:25 UTC ---
Test case from comment #16 has been fixed.
Is there anything else to do?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52995
Bug #: 52995
Summary: Change in the handling of templates and visibility
attributes
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50673
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig 2012-04-15
11:52:49 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Apr 15 11:52:44 2012
New Revision: 186466
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186466
Log:
2012-04-15 Thomas Koenig
PR libfortran/38
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52995
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.7.0
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wake
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52995
--- Comment #2 from Rafael Avila de Espindola 2012-04-15 12:28:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/changes.html
> "The ELF symbol visibility of a template instantiation is now properly
> constrained by the visibility o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52702
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-04-15
13:43:51 UTC ---
Daniel I'm adding this.
By the way, is "is_nothrow_destructible" doable just now or needs compiler
support? Are you willing to give it a try, in case? (or, if necessary, I can do
the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52702
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler
2012-04-15 14:05:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Daniel I'm adding this.
>
> By the way, is "is_nothrow_destructible" doable just now or needs compiler
> support? Are you willing to give it a try, in case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #19 from Jerry DeLisle 2012-04-15
14:17:43 UTC ---
I think this can be closed. Thanks Thomas! The last patch is simple enough to
consider a backport.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52702
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-04-15
14:30:19 UTC ---
Ah, I see, I didn't know about that DR.
Then, sure, whenever you like it would be great if you could contribute
is_nothrow_destructible too: should not be much more controversial than
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52528
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-04-15
14:55:13 UTC ---
This patch has now been applied to trunk aka 4.8 and to the 4.6 branch, but not
to the 4.7 branch. Is the exclusion of 4.7 intentional?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52996
Bug #: 52996
Summary: ice in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1567
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52974
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-15
15:31:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 27160
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27160
patch
This patch implements the shortening in line-map.c. It seems more general fix
than touch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52974
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52996
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47762
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-04-15
16:35:41 UTC ---
AFAICT the failures have disappeared on powerpc-apple-darwin9 between revisions
186224 and 186440.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52702
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39728
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52818
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2012-04-15
17:07:34 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Apr 15 17:07:30 2012
New Revision: 186468
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186468
Log:
PR c++/52818
* c-format.c (CPLUSPLUS_STD_VE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52706
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2012-04-15
17:07:43 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Apr 15 17:07:39 2012
New Revision: 186469
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186469
Log:
PR c++/52706
* mangle.c (write_type): nullp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52818
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19377
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52706
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47762
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-04-15
17:08:27 UTC ---
See if, by chance, libstdc++/52604 did the "miracle". I would like that ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52454
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52824
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fat.lobyte9 at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52707
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2012-04-15
17:15:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 27161
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27161
partial patch
This patch fixes the bug, but breaks several other tests in the testsuite,
because man
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52707
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|jason at gcc dot g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19377
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-15
17:17:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> You should write to Jason directly, as he is probably the only person in the
> world that understands the C++ FE well enough to answer this.
>
> (And am I t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52997
Bug #: 52997
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-intconst-1.c
(internal compiler error)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19377
--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-15
17:41:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > You should write to Jason directly, as he is probably the only person in the
> > world that understands the C++ FE well en
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52702
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2012-04-15
17:48:21 UTC ---
Scratch the std::is_trivially_default_constructible bit, sorry.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19377
--- Comment #8 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-15 18:24:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > (In reply to comment #5)
> > > You should write to Jason directly, as he is probably the only person in
> > > the
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52974
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-15
18:32:49 UTC ---
That was fast :)
I've only tested it lightly but it looks great, thank you very much.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52994
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52994
--- Comment #3 from Sylwester Arabas 2012-04-15
19:28:22 UTC ---
> pointer-valued (and dimensionful) type-bound procedure. Phew.
> Thanks for the nice test case :)
That's what I've got trying to reimplement quite verbosely a piece of C++ code
i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52994
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-15 19:32:22 UTC ---
Just out of curiosity: Are you aware of any compiler which swallows this?
Here is a slightly reduced test case, which gives the same ICE:
module adv
implicit none
type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52994
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-15 19:37:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> That's what I've got trying to reimplement quite verbosely a piece of C++ code
> in Fortran :)
That seems like a rare intention. There are certainl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52994
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-15 19:40:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Here is a slightly reduced test case, which gives the same ICE:
Note #1: When commenting out the 'ICE' line, compilation goes through and
running t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52994
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-15 19:43:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Here is a slightly reduced test case, which gives the same ICE:
Note #2: When changing "class(adv_t)" into "type(adv_t)", one gets:
a%left_halo(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51266
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-15 19:55:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (A PR might already exist for this thread.)
Well, there is PR 45290 and PR 50410 comment 9, which are at least related.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51266
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-15 20:03:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> > (A PR might already exist for this thread.)
>
> Well, there is PR 45290 and PR 50410 comment 9, which are at least related.
And moreover there i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52998
Bug #: 52998
Summary: caret and -ftrack-macro-expansion don't mix well
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52465
--- Comment #8 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-15 20:22:47 UTC ---
Author: fabien
Date: Sun Apr 15 20:22:44 2012
New Revision: 186473
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186473
Log:
2012-04-15 Fabien Chêne
PR c++/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52994
--- Comment #8 from Sylwester Arabas 2012-04-15
20:23:18 UTC ---
> Just out of curiosity: Are you aware of any compiler which swallows this?
No. I've just tried it with PGI (pgf95) but it chokes on "contains" "within a
derived type definition".
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52465
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52998
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52998
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-15
20:37:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I think with and without macro expansion, the error should be given at 13:3,
> and unwind from outermost to innermost. Innermost to outermost makes sen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52994
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-15 20:41:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > Just out of curiosity: Are you aware of any compiler which swallows this?
>
> No. I've just tried it with PGI (pgf95) but it chokes on "contains"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52999
Bug #: 52999
Summary: [4.7, 4.8 Regression] ICE, segmentation fault in
c_tree_printer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52702
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-15 23:35:33 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Apr 15 23:35:27 2012
New Revision: 186474
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186474
Log:
2012-04-15 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53000
Bug #: 53000
Summary: Trinary operator does not behave as standardized
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52292
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52380
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47220
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45873
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35722
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sausage at tehsausage dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
Bug #: 53001
Summary: -Wfloat-conversion should be available to warn about
floating point errors
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52292
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2012-04-16
03:18:13 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Apr 16 03:18:06 2012
New Revision: 186479
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186479
Log:
PR c++/52292
PR c++/52380
* pt.c (coerc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47220
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2012-04-16
03:18:22 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Apr 16 03:18:17 2012
New Revision: 186480
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186480
Log:
PR c++/47220
* pt.c (coerce_template_parame
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52380
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2012-04-16
03:18:13 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Apr 16 03:18:06 2012
New Revision: 186479
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186479
Log:
PR c++/52292
PR c++/52380
* pt.c (coerc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52292
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2012-04-16
03:40:38 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Apr 16 03:40:34 2012
New Revision: 186481
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186481
Log:
PR c++/52292
PR c++/52380
* pt.c (coerc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52380
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2012-04-16
03:40:38 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Apr 16 03:40:34 2012
New Revision: 186481
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186481
Log:
PR c++/52292
PR c++/52380
* pt.c (coerc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52292
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47220
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52380
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53002
Bug #: 53002
Summary: Request new specs string token for multilib_os_dir
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24976
Bernie Innocenti changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-11-21 22:27:09 |2012-04-16 22:27:09
CC
Hi, Dear investors.
T_RK_P.OB had a short break since Friday but the hard-hitting news release
is is going to be out first thing on Monday, this means that the deal is
about to get blasted! Put T_RK_P.OB on your watch-list and get more shares
right after the news-release is released! This deal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53003
Bug #: 53003
Summary: Internal compiler error on short testcase
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
80 matches
Mail list logo
