http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52883
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496
--- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou 2012-04-09
08:04:40 UTC ---
> However, recog.c contains in various places checks that will *accept* -during
> reload- a pseudo in places where a memory constraint is required; exactly
> because such pseudos will
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52883
--- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak 2012-04-09 08:07:47
UTC ---
Created attachment 27116
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27116
Untested patch
Patch in testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52908
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52717
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-04-09
08:53:33 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Apr 9 08:53:27 2012
New Revision: 186237
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186237
Log:
PR target/52717
* config/sparc/sparc.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52717
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou 2012-04-09
08:53:54 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Apr 9 08:53:49 2012
New Revision: 186239
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186239
Log:
PR target/52717
* config/sparc/sparc.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52717
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou 2012-04-09
08:54:07 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Apr 9 08:54:03 2012
New Revision: 186240
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186240
Log:
PR target/52717
* config/sparc/sparc.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52717
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou 2012-04-09
08:53:40 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Apr 9 08:53:37 2012
New Revision: 186238
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186238
Log:
PR target/52717
* config/sparc/sparc.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52717
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52883
--- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-09 09:57:18 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Apr 9 09:57:13 2012
New Revision: 186243
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186243
Log:
PR target/52883
* config/i386/predi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52883
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49258
--- Comment #6 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2012-04-09 11:14:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Yes,but why we can't remove the function notused() form vtable, since this
> > function will never used.
>
> How
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52908
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2012-04-09 11:48:05
UTC ---
Created attachment 27117
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27117
Proposed patch
There are indeed two problems with XOP patterns:
a) duplication of *sse4_1_mulv2siv2di
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911
Bug #: 52911
Summary: gcc 4.7.0 (ppc32 e500mc) when compile a c file, after
a lot of time, gcc failed and internal compiler error
occurs.
Classification: Unclassified
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52909
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52679
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52622
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --with-libelf=/usr/local --enable-lto
--prefix=/home/regehr/z/compiler-install/gcc-r186233-install
--program-prefix=r186233- --enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20120409 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50439
--- Comment #10 from William J. Schmidt
2012-04-09 16:03:27 UTC ---
FWIW, my original compile did eventually complete (after 31.5 hours)...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985
--- Comment #27 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-04-09 16:04:46 UTC ---
"manu at gcc dot gnu.org" a écrit:
> Dodji, are you planning to propose to enable -ftrack-macro-expansion
> by default in GCC 4.8?
Wow, what a timing!
I am working on
lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --with-libelf=/usr/local --enable-lto
--prefix=/home/regehr/z/compiler-install/gcc-r186233-install
--program-prefix=r186233- --enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20120409 (experimental) (GCC)
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --with-libelf=/usr/local --enable-lto
--prefix=/home/regehr/z/compiler-install/gcc-r186233-install
--program-prefix=r186233- --enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20120409 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985
--- Comment #28 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-04-09 16:19:15 UTC ---
"manu at gcc dot gnu.org" a écrit:
> Of course, it needs some fine-tuning to avoid repetitions, but this is
> a problem with the locations given by the macro expansion u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52913
John Regehr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52881
--- Comment #1 from John Regehr 2012-04-09 16:18:46
UTC ---
*** Bug 52913 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52915
Bug #: 52915
Summary: [C++11] Deleted default-constructor of anonymous
unions not honored
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496
--- Comment #20 from Leif Leonhardy 2012-04-09
16:42:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> It is time to do something as GCC 4.7 is quite hampered by this on IA-64.
Indeed. Besides MPIR (hence presumably also GMP) and NTL, also MPFR, GMP-ECM,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52916
Bug #: 52916
Summary: [4.8 Regression] 481.wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to
build
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52607
--- Comment #27 from Marc Glisse 2012-04-09
16:50:47 UTC ---
Notes to self (or other):
- Intel's SDE makes it possible to test without appropriate hardware;
- for V4DF shuffles, there seems to be a very simple generic solution that
performs two v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52722
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2012-04-09
18:57:49 UTC ---
This seems to be another manifestation of the alias partitioning issues. I am
testing a fix.
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52883
--- Comment #12 from Uros Bizjak 2012-04-09 18:59:50
UTC ---
*** Bug 52914 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52914
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52916
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52476
--- Comment #6 from François Dumont 2012-04-09
19:12:23 UTC ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Mon Apr 9 19:12:18 2012
New Revision: 186249
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186249
Log:
2012-04-09 François Dumont
PR libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49258
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-09
19:40:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> and i test a c++ file,it will remove the unused funcitons "notused":
But that is not the same as there is no vtable for hello.
Try:
#include
class hello
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52917
Bug #: 52917
Summary: explicitly stated return type in std::mem_fn cannot be
compiled
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
build\gcc\gcc\xgcc.exe
Target: x86_64-w64-mingw32
Configured with: ../../gcc/configure --target=x86_64-w64-mingw32
--enable-targets=all --with-sysroot=/c/mingw64-devel --prefix=/c/mi
ngw64-devel
Thread model: win32
gcc version 4.8.0 20120409 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-sh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52918
B. Scott Michel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52918
--- Comment #1 from B. Scott Michel 2012-04-09
20:31:53 UTC ---
Patch to check bb->loop_father is relatively obvious, but not clear that the
patch would do the right thing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52476
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52917
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52917
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-09
21:35:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Or you can do
>
> auto y = std::mem_fn((int& (X::*)())&X::get );
Or
auto y = std::mem_fn (&X::get );
Which should also work with either libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52919
Bug #: 52919
Summary: shift expansion mishandles SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED on
partial integer modes
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52919
--- Comment #1 from Peter A. Bigot 2012-04-09 22:30:20
UTC ---
Created attachment 27119
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27119
Replace GET_MODE_BITSIZE with GET_MODE_PRECISION where necessary
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52856
--- Comment #1 from Peter A. Bigot 2012-04-09 22:31:59
UTC ---
Created attachment 27120
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27120
Replace GET_MODE_BITSIZE with GET_MODE_PRECISION where necessary
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51765
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2012-04-09
23:39:16 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Apr 9 23:39:11 2012
New Revision: 186252
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186252
Log:
PR lto/52722
PR lto/51765
PR lto/52634
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52634
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2012-04-09
23:39:15 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Apr 9 23:39:11 2012
New Revision: 186252
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186252
Log:
PR lto/52722
PR lto/51765
PR lto/52634
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52722
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2012-04-09
23:39:15 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Apr 9 23:39:11 2012
New Revision: 186252
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186252
Log:
PR lto/52722
PR lto/51765
PR lto/52634
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52920
Bug #: 52920
Summary: function call optimized away with
ftree-loop-distribute-patterns
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52777
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-04-10 00:51:35 UTC ---
On 29-Mar-12, at 2:26 PM, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52777
>
> --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-03-29
> 18:26:06 UT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52777
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-10
00:56:37 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Apr 10 00:56:27 2012
New Revision: 186257
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186257
Log:
Remove SIO and GNU_LD from config/pa/pa.opt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52921
Bug #: 52921
Summary: Memory errors when compiled with -fstrict-overflow
flag
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52922
Bug #: 52922
Summary: failed to build gcc 4.7 on SL6.1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52922
--- Comment #1 from scott at smedleyfamily dot net 2012-04-10 05:41:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 27122
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27122
config.log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52922
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
57 matches
Mail list logo
