[Bug fortran/40973] Mark PRIVATE module functions as STATIC to faciliate optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40973 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-04-08 07:15:12 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sun Apr 8 07:15:01 2012 New Revision: 186223 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186223 Log: 2012-04-08 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/52

[Bug fortran/52751] private module variable are not exported as local

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52751 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-04-08 07:15:12 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sun Apr 8 07:15:01 2012 New Revision: 186223 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186223 Log: 2012-04-08 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/52

[Bug rtl-optimization/48496] [4.7/4.8 Regression] 'asm' operand requires impossible reload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496 --- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou 2012-04-08 07:42:36 UTC --- Reload maintainers, do you have objections to removing the problematic block of code as suggested by Vlad in comment #4? If so, please propose something else.

[Bug fortran/40973] Mark PRIVATE module functions as STATIC to faciliate optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40973 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/52751] private module variable are not exported as local

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52751 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/52724] Internal read with character(kind=4) data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52724 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2012-04-08 08:55:42 UTC --- Yes, my original test case was bogus. Slightly reduced test case: program main implicit none integer :: i character(len=100,kind=4) :: buffer buffer = 4_"123" read(buffer,*

[Bug c/52904] New: -Wstrict-overflow false alarm with bounded loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52904 Bug #: 52904 Summary: -Wstrict-overflow false alarm with bounded loop Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c/52904] -Wstrict-overflow false alarm with bounded loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52904 --- Comment #1 from eggert at gnu dot org 2012-04-08 08:59:43 UTC --- Created attachment 27114 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27114 gcc -v output, for test case

[Bug c/52904] -Wstrict-overflow false alarm with bounded loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52904 eggert at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27113|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/52630] [4.7 regression] ICE when compiling ppl-0.12 testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52630 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou

[Bug tree-optimization/52904] -Wstrict-overflow false alarm with bounded loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52904 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Component|c

[Bug c++/44786] -fcatch-undefined-behavior: Turn on runtime code generation to check for undefined behavior

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44786 Ivan Sorokin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vanyacpp at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 f

[Bug java/42143] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcj creates "dummy" variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42143 Roumen Petrov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugtrack at roumenpetrov

[Bug target/52883] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1464

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52883 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Component|rtl-optimization

[Bug c++/52901] invalid rvalue reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52901 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug libstdc++/16612] empty basic_strings can't live in shared memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16612 --- Comment #35 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-08 13:59:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #34) > For what it's worth, it appears as if I was just bitten by this issue in a > slightly different context. You haven't given enough detail to know if it's

[Bug c++/44786] -fcatch-undefined-behavior: Turn on runtime code generation to check for undefined behavior

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44786 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-08 14:06:31 UTC --- Indeed. I think it's meant to be useful for catching some of the problems that valgrind identifies, and valgrind has even more performance overhead. That said, although I haven't u

[Bug c++/52901] invalid rvalue reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52901 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/52867] Compilation of gcc-4.4.7 with gcc-4.2.4 fails on arm platform

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52867 --- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw 2012-04-08 14:38:23 UTC --- If the problem is with your installed compiler, there are a number of ways in which you might work around the problem: - Build stage1 with optimization enabled: STAGE1_CFLAGS - Buil

[Bug bootstrap/52867] Compilation of gcc-4.4.7 with gcc-4.2.4 fails on arm platform

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52867 --- Comment #5 from Szűcs, Gábor 2012-04-08 15:12:53 UTC --- Thanks a lot! For the records: I managed to proceed with compilation till stage3 where I had to disable compare as per install docs. Afterwards, cc1 seems to have some flaw because it

[Bug c++/52901] invalid rvalue reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52901 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marc.glisse at normalesup

[Bug c++/52905] New: [C++0x] ice on invalid brace-enclosed initializer of vector of enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52905 Bug #: 52905 Summary: [C++0x] ice on invalid brace-enclosed initializer of vector of enums Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/52905] [C++0x] ice on invalid brace-enclosed initializer of vector of enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52905 --- Comment #1 from Dirk Moermans 2012-04-08 16:17:40 UTC --- I compile with g++ -std=c++0x

[Bug rtl-optimization/48496] [4.7/4.8 Regression] 'asm' operand requires impossible reload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496 --- Comment #18 from Ulrich Weigand 2012-04-08 17:32:23 UTC --- According to Vlad's comment #4, the validity check fails because a reload insn contains a spilled pseudo that will later be replaced by a MEM. However, recog.c contains in various p

[Bug c++/52905] [C++0x] ice on invalid brace-enclosed initializer of vector of enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52905 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Status|

[Bug c++/52901] invalid rvalue reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52901 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wak

[Bug c++/52901] invalid rvalue reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52901 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-08 18:09:06 UTC --- See also PR 51066 and PR 51270 and PR 38958 for similar RFEs for better diagnostics about creating dangling references

[Bug c++/49974] missing warning for indirectly returning reference to local/temporary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49974 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-08 18:15:04 UTC --- As pointed out in PR 52901 comment 3, this missing warning is likely to bite people misusing std::move like so: X&& f() { X x; return std::move(x); }

[Bug c++/52906] New: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in check_tag_decl (decl.c:4230) with "__attribute__ ((__deprecated__));" alone

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52906 Bug #: 52906 Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in check_tag_decl (decl.c:4230) with "__attribute__ ((__deprecated__));" alone Classification: Unclassified Produ

[Bug middle-end/44786] -fcatch-undefined-behavior: Turn on runtime code generation to check for undefined behavior

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44786 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-08 18:57:51 UTC --- > # Subscripting where the static type of one operand is variable which is decayed from an array type and the other operand is greater than the size of the array or less than zero.

[Bug tree-optimization/52907] New: Underflowing floating point expressions wrongly folded to zero

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52907 Bug #: 52907 Summary: Underflowing floating point expressions wrongly folded to zero Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/52908] New: xop-mul-1:f9 miscompiled on bulldozer (-mxop)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52908 Bug #: 52908 Summary: xop-mul-1:f9 miscompiled on bulldozer (-mxop) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug fortran/52909] New: Procedure pointers not private to modules

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52909 Bug #: 52909 Summary: Procedure pointers not private to modules Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug target/52910] New: xop-mul-1:f13 miscompiled on bulldozer (-mxop)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52910 Bug #: 52910 Summary: xop-mul-1:f13 miscompiled on bulldozer (-mxop) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug fortran/52909] [F03] Procedure pointers not private to modules

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52909 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|