[Bug libstdc++/47052] make: *** [configure-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 1 Cross compile GCC for Alpha Architecture

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47052 --- Comment #4 from John Marino 2012-04-07 07:20:00 UTC --- Adding "--disable-sjlj-exceptions" to the configure options will get one past this error on the android/arm target.

[Bug java/49258] -ffunction-sections and --gc-sectinons have no effect at gcj

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49258 licheng.1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker --- Comment #2 from lich

[Bug c/52897] New: gcc 4.7.0 generates worse code than gcc 3.4.6 for m68000

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52897 Bug #: 52897 Summary: gcc 4.7.0 generates worse code than gcc 3.4.6 for m68000 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/52897] gcc 4.7.0 generates worse code than gcc 3.4.6 for m68000

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52897 --- Comment #1 from fdarkangel at gmail dot com 2012-04-07 08:36:41 UTC --- Created attachment 27110 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27110 C code demonstrating the problem + assembly output of gcc3 and gcc4

[Bug java/49258] -ffunction-sections and --gc-sectinons have no effect at gcj

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49258 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug java/49258] -ffunction-sections and --gc-sectinons have no effect at gcj

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49258 licheng.1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|WAITING Resolution|INVAL

[Bug c/52897] gcc 4.7.0 generates worse code than gcc 3.4.6 for m68000

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52897 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #2

[Bug target/52898] New: SH Target: Inefficient comparison of DImode and immediate constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52898 Bug #: 52898 Summary: SH Target: Inefficient comparison of DImode and immediate constant Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug java/49258] -ffunction-sections and --gc-sectinons have no effect at gcj

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49258 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal

[Bug c++/24985] caret diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug c++/52892] Function pointer loses constexpr qualification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52892 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler 2012-04-07 13:15:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) [..] > Based on my reading of the standard, this should be allowed behavior, and > works as expected with clang 3.1 (152539). I agree that this should work,

[Bug preprocessor/52899] New: tabstop has no effect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52899 Bug #: 52899 Summary: tabstop has no effect Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug c++/52900] New: Compile source using Boost header with -static -flto -std=c++11 breaks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52900 Bug #: 52900 Summary: Compile source using Boost header with -static -flto -std=c++11 breaks Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIR

[Bug libstdc++/52764] Including after fails to define limit macros

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52764 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-04-07 16:06:46 UTC --- My previous suggestion stands of having the compiler predefine __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS and __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS, whether for C++11 or generally for C++, to make all exi

[Bug c/52769] Unspecified designated initializer might not set to zero in some cases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52769 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-04-07 16:10:37 UTC --- We should at least add the execution test from this bug report (appropriately adapted) to the testsuite.

[Bug c++/52901] New: invalid rvalue reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52901 Bug #: 52901 Summary: invalid rvalue reference Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug fortran/52893] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Moving functions out of implied DO loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52893 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig 2012-04-07 16:38:19 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Apr 7 16:38:11 2012 New Revision: 186213 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186213 Log: 2012-04-07 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/52893

[Bug c++/52902] New: Pointer to member rejected in constant expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52902 Bug #: 52902 Summary: Pointer to member rejected in constant expression Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug java/49258] -ffunction-sections and --gc-sectinons have no effect at gcj

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49258 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52900] Compile source using Boost header with -static -flto -std=c++11 breaks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52900 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-07 18:14:17 UTC --- What version of binutils are you using (supply ld --version output)? This might have been be a binutils which is fixed already. Also try -fno-use-linker-plugin.

[Bug middle-end/52894] [4.5,4.6,4.7,4.8 Regression] Stage1 bootstrap fails with gcc-4.6.3: Infinite loop in pointer_set_insert

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52894 --- Comment #5 from John David Anglin 2012-04-07 19:09:56 UTC --- Created attachment 27112 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27112 Patch

[Bug c++/52900] Compile source using Boost header with -static -flto -std=c++11 breaks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52900 --- Comment #2 from gccBugs at haatschii dot de 2012-04-07 19:21:46 UTC --- ld --version gives: GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.22 I tried -fno-use-linker-plugin as well as -fwhole-program. No difference.

[Bug fortran/52893] [4.7 Regression] Moving functions out of implied DO loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52893 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.1 Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regress

[Bug fortran/52668] [4.7 Regression] Incorrect unused warning for USE associating variable in common block

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52668 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2012-04-07 19:58:49 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Apr 7 19:58:43 2012 New Revision: 186214 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186214 Log: 2012-04-07 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/52668

[Bug fortran/52668] [4.7 Regression] Incorrect unused warning for USE associating variable in common block

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52668 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/52893] [4.7 Regression] Moving functions out of implied DO loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52893 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig 2012-04-07 20:27:10 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Apr 7 20:27:02 2012 New Revision: 186215 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186215 Log: 2012-04-07 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/52893

[Bug fortran/52893] [4.7 Regression] Moving functions out of implied DO loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52893 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/47901] -Wall should not imply -Wformat-zero-length by default

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47901 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joseph at codesourcery dot

[Bug other/52777] [4.8 Regression] ./options.h:3546:0: error: "MASK_SIO" redefined [-Werror]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52777 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-04-07 23:59:57 UTC --- On 29-Mar-12, at 2:26 PM, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > We don't need SIO and GNU_LD in pa.opt any more. Please > try this. I had come to the same conclusion. You

[Bug target/25111] [m68k] bset is not used for A = 1 << (B & 31) on ColdFire

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25111 fdarkangel at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fdarkangel at gmail dot com

[Bug c/52903] New: cppopts.texi, invoke.texi @itemx without @item

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52903 Bug #: 52903 Summary: cppopts.texi, invoke.texi @itemx without @item Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

Configure fails

../gcc-4.7.0/configure --with-ppl=/usr/local --with-cloog=/usr/local/ --enable-cloog-backend=isl --with-tune-64=corei7-avx --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto fails when using cloog 0.17. cloog 0.16.2 works well. -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis z