http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52816
Bug #: 52816
Summary: Access to private members inside decltype in the
signature of a member template causes access control
error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
--- Comment #15 from Venkataramanan
2012-04-01 07:55:24 UTC ---
Hi Uros,
I had a look at reload pass.
I have an RTL sequence that look like this.
(insn 32 31 33 2 (set (subreg:V4SF (reg:V2DF 284) 0) <== psuedo reguster
(unspec:V4SF [
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
Bug #: 52817
Summary: g++ do not call a method with same name on some
platforms(see small example source attached)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52813
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
7 or newer (confirmed segfault also with today's
4.8.0 20120401).
However, using the stock gcc, (aka gcc-4.7.0-1.fc17.x86_64),
there is no problem.
Using valgrind the problem does not arise.
Same story when using gdb directly, so below I let
it generate a core file and ran gdb on that.
It sug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52818
Bug #: 52818
Summary: printf format %lf is erroneously rejected by C++11
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
--- Comment #26 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-01
11:24:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> Personally, I don't believe Gaby is open to other solutions outside the
> full-fledged "caret diagnostics" context, thus for the time being at least
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52818
--- Comment #1 from Kerrek SB 2012-04-01
12:09:34 UTC ---
Correction: The warnings do NOT appear (correctly so) for C99 and C11.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52819
Bug #: 52819
Summary: ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl
minimal' structure, have 'nop_expr' in decl_linkage,
at cp/tree.c:3136
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-01
12:37:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> void Wsafile::readdata(int NumFiles, va_list args) {
> long * RWop;
> printf("readdata 2 called \n");
> RWop = va_arg(args,long *);
> p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-01
12:43:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > void Wsafile::readdata(int NumFiles, va_list args) {
> > long * RWop;
> > printf("readdata 2 called \n");
> > R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-01
12:46:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Stop using unsafe casts between incompatible types.
That is the least of the worries here.
The real issue is how is va_list implemented on some target. Th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
--- Comment #27 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-01
12:55:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> because if you want nice diagnostics, why don't just use
> Clang?
Because G++ gives much better diagnostics for template argument deduction
failures, so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52820
Bug #: 52820
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in create_preheader, at
cfgloopmanip.c:1363
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
--- Comment #5 from bernd_afa 2012-04-01 13:22:22
UTC ---
Created attachment 27057
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27057
preproc file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
--- Comment #28 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-01
13:23:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> (In reply to comment #26)
> > because if you want nice diagnostics, why don't just use
> > Clang?
>
> Because G++ gives much better diagnostics for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
--- Comment #6 from bernd_afa 2012-04-01 13:26:40
UTC ---
>Not a bug. An ellipses conversion sequence is worse than a standard conversion
>sequence, thus readdata(int,void*) is preferred over readdata(int,...) when the
>actual arguments are (int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-01
13:33:25 UTC ---
>there is a C++ game called dunelegacy which work on other GCC architecture ok
Yes so the ABI for the 68k says va_list is a void* which is a valid choice as
far as the C++ standard is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9050
Johannes Schaub changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schaub.johannes at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9050
--- Comment #14 from Johannes Schaub
2012-04-01 14:14:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Jason, does http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1435
> not render the explicit specialization ill-formed for C++11TC1? It only all
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
--- Comment #8 from bernd_afa 2012-04-01 14:16:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> >there is a C++ game called dunelegacy which work on other GCC architecture ok
>
> Yes so the ABI for the 68k says va_list is a void* which is a valid choice as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-01
14:31:37 UTC ---
> maybe change va_list to mainstraim behavior in the amigaos or AROS compiler
> build let more C++ programs get working without changes.
You cannot change va_list without changing the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52810
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|classpath
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52813
Josh Haberman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52820
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-04-01 16:04:29 UTC ---
Most likely a dup of PR52808.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52808
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52817
--- Comment #10 from bernd_afa 2012-04-01 16:12:28
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> You cannot change va_list without changing the ABI and that is not going to
> fly
anywhere.
>
> You just need to take better into account what va_list can be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52808
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-04-01 16:14:15 UTC ---
*** Bug 52820 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52820
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52821
Bug #: 52821
Summary: [4.8 Regression] 191.fma3d in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to
build with LTO
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52805
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe 2012-04-01 17:28:47
UTC ---
I suspect you might have altered the priority of class discovery methods
inadvertently.
e.g. AFAICT, although darwin defines JCR_SECTION_NAME, there is no crt
machinery to deal with it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52818
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52822
Bug #: 52822
Summary: [C++11] stable_partition destroys sequence due to
inappropriate self-move-assignment
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52813
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2012-04-01 18:58:27
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I don't expect the compiler to analyze the asm string. I expect the compiler
> to respect my clobber list.
>
> I told GCC that I would clobber %rsp. Any oth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52813
--- Comment #4 from Josh Haberman 2012-04-01
19:23:14 UTC ---
I understand that GCC may not be able to save/restore %rsp like it does other
registers. But if that's the case, GCC should throw an error if the user puts
%rsp in the clobber list, i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marc.glisse at normalesup
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52823
Bug #: 52823
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/renaming5.adb
scan-tree-dump-times optimized "goto" 2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52822
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey Yasskin 2012-04-01
20:41:43 UTC ---
Running the 4.6 testsuite with -std=c++0x as the default was unsuccessful, in
that it found only one error in an execution test, which was already known, and
didn't find the stable_p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52822
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52824
Bug #: 52824
Summary: [C++11] expanding variadic template arguments into
non-variadic template
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52822
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-04-01
21:50:42 UTC ---
Lately, in 4.6 too, in the occasion of a similar issue, we also added a check
for self-move assignment to __gnu_test::rvalstruct. Evidently, the small
testcases we have got already do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52591
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-01
22:04:59 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Sun Apr 1 22:04:54 2012
New Revision: 186057
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186057
Log:
PR libstdc++/52591
* include/bits/stl_vec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52822
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-04-01
22:09:45 UTC ---
PS: then shall we just do the assignment only when __result1 != __first, or
algorithmically we can do better? In case we can also imagine having the
trivial fix for 4.6 and maybe even
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52591
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-01
22:12:29 UTC ---
fixed on the trunk so far
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52805
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-04-01
22:30:33 UTC ---
Nice working patch! Though I doubt it'll work for linux;-) (both i686 and
x86_64).
=== libjava Summary for unix/-m64 ===
# of expected passes2574
===
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52823
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52797
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52825
Bug #: 52825
Summary: incorrect message for "incompatible pointer type" with
typedeffed structs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52826
Bug #: 52826
Summary: Implement core/1170
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
--- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-02 00:13:35 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Apr 2 00:13:30 2012
New Revision: 186058
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186058
Log:
/cp
2012-04-01 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52827
Bug #: 52827
Summary: -mx32 is not recognized
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52827
Jan Engelhardt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Sev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52827
Jan Engelhardt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-mx32 is not recognized |Document requirements for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52827
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52822
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey Yasskin 2012-04-02
02:15:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 27058
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27058
Fix by skipping past true-predicate values
Here's an algorithmic fix that passes check-c++. As a s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52828
Bug #: 52828
Summary: powerpc -m32 -Os writes register saves below stack
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52829
Bug #: 52829
Summary: gcc releases up to 4.6.2 triggers ICE when compiling
Gambit Scheme at -O2 on ppc64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52829
--- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim
2012-04-02 04:10:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 27060
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27060
Preprocessed source file that triggers ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
--- Comment #30 from Jason Merrill 2012-04-02
05:16:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> The caret is not a solution to this problem, because what Gabriel wants is to
> not reconstruct expressions ONLY when the caret is shown, but he has said i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9050
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill 2012-
62 matches
Mail list logo
